search for: accusator

On Thu, January 14, 2016 11:46 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Timo Sch??ler wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 01/14/2016 05:34 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Michael H wrote: >>>> Probably worth a read... >>>> >>>> http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.1p2 >>>>

before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate with me: Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone Duration: 930 seconds Lets vote for the answers: 0.7269 or 0.2929 ??? bye Ronald Wiplinger

On 29 October 2015 at 10:25, Jonas Maebe via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding the previously voiced concerns of incompatibilities between the > Apache and GPLv2 license, I'd like to add one more thing. > > I work on a, at this time mostly LLVM-unrelated [1], "GPLv2 or later" > licensed compiler: the Free Pascal Compiler. Some

Hello James, About the warning, I only accept it and try to create a new attribute/class. However, when I put all the parameters (name, OID, syntax...), the system accuses that the server is unable to proceed. Do you know if Samba's schema is closed, that cannot be modified? Lucas On 11/1/2016 11:18 AM, Lukz Ferris via samba wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I'm trying to

Daniel, nobody has accused you of reinventing the wheel. You give up too easily. If you want to develop a standard, it takes a lot of discussion and input - and it takes diplomacy. Attacking people and attacking the community will not be helpful. You have asked for feedback - feedback has been given. Now it's time to think and digest. I for one have been motivated by the topic of discussion,

On Fri, June 12, 2015 4:16 pm, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/12/2015 03:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote: >>> >>> On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote: >>>>> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>>>> But the

Greetings all, This has come up a few times, and I would like to resume the effort to establish an LLVM code of conduct. First and foremost, many thanks to Philip Reames who sat down with me several months ago and worked through a number of suggestions that I've tried to incorporate into an updated patch with the draft text: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741 I think his updates plus a few

The standard chisq.test() and fisher.test() functions, when applied to two distributions (to determine whether the same underlying distribution applies to both) requires one to pre-bin the distributions. Is there a library function (either built-in or in a package) that acts more like the ks.test() function, in that one can simply pass the two distributions and have it do the necessary binning as

Hi David/Galina, FYI, I found one big reason why self-hosting bots fail long after the offending commit is tested: dirty builds. In a dirty build (no make clean), when a file X is changed that breaks file Y, the bot will only accuse the failure when file Y is changed, too, so that stage1 with modified X will compile file Y, and break. At hindsight, it's obvious. But I hadn't connected

> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Fielding [mailto:paul@fielding.ca] > Frankly, I agree. If you don't like the question, feel it's > lame or dumb, > or don't like that someone hasn't done their research, then > delete the message. Well, sometimes that works. But I've been on a lot of lists where newbies who thought they were being ignored

I have subscribed to this list for about a month now. I am just a MarkDown user; new to it. Using it within *Ema Personal Wiki & Epistle* for Android. I am not trying to implement this cool little light language into an app I am developing; maybe someday. I signed up because I thought I might get some MarkDown use tips. *I have learned nothing from this list.* I have witnessed a lot of

This morning I placed a post on this mailing list as follows: In Windows Explorer, 'Network Drives' section, the Samba share I've set up is described as: share on 'Samba 3.0.14a-0.4-SUSE (Our_server_IP_Address)' (K:) Is there any way of configuring Samba to display something other than "Samba 3.0.14a-0.4-SUSE (Our_server_IP_Address)" as the Network Drive

On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>> But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing >>>> somebody's else code on your computer. >>> >>> your

On Nov 9, 2015, at 11:42 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: > Hi David/Galina, > > FYI, I found one big reason why self-hosting bots fail long after the > offending commit is tested: dirty builds. >

Hello! Output of command # 1 record dn: CN={31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=MYDOMAIN cn: {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} name: {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} Referral # ref: ldap: //interno.mastersonda.com.br/CN=Configuration,DC=MYDOMAIN Referral # ref: ldap: //interno.mastersonda.com.br/DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=MYDOMAIN Referral # ref: ldap:

Hi Galina, I have observed that some of my bots timeout for no apparent reason (no external load, no network mishaps, no issues), and when I go to check the buildslave process, I see that it has just being restarted. Do you know what could be causing this? Swap is untouched, plenty of disk left, CPUs a plenty. So, I'm contemplating the possibility that the master lost connectivity to it and

Hello everyone, I'm trying to create new attributes/classes in Samba AD using Windows RSAT tools, perhaps it always accuses that the server is unable to proceed. Now I even think if it is possible to create new attributes/classes in Samba. Someone can help me? Thanks, Lucas

After accusing someone of typing 'install.packages("weather")' instead of 'install.packages("webmaps")', I discovered that R-forge really is currently returning the wrong source tarball for packages after 'Repitools' in the alphabet. The data returned from available.package in install.packages goes out of sync at 'Repitools': RemoteREngine

Hi, I've downloaded and installed kernel-2.4.9 from rawhide in order to use ext3 support (I've also upgraded the necessary packages). I've used tune2fs to make the current ext2 partitions (incluind /) and changed fstab to reflect that. In order to test if everything is ok (this is a test machine) I've switched off with no shutdown. Except the / all other partitions accused

Fellows, Someone has probably asked about it before, but I've just joinned this list. I'm having some trouble with Windows XP clients. Here's what's happening: some clients join the Samba Domain normally but, after the required boot (always required - it's a Windows machine), the machine refuses to logon to the domains accusing that the PDC could not be found; another