search for: a102

...p200-009d24b0' wanrouter status: wanrouter status Devices currently active: wanpipe1 wanpipe2 wanpipe3 wanpipe4 wanpipe5 wanpipe6 wanpipe7 wanpipe8 Wanpipe Config: Device name | Protocol Map | Adapter | IRQ | Slot/IO | If's | CLK | Baud rate | wanpipe1 | N/A | A101/1D/A102/2D/4/4D/8| 17 | 4 | 1 | N/A | 0 | wanpipe2 | N/A | A101/1D/A102/2D/4/4D/8| 17 | 4 | 1 | N/A | 0 | wanpipe3 | N/A | A101/1D/A102/2D/4/4D/8| 17 | 4 | 1 | N/A | 0 | wanpipe4 | N/A | A101/1D/A102/2D/4/4D/8| 17 |...

Hi, after many issues we finally managed to make our system do outgoing calls with perfect quality. However I cannot detect *any* form of incoming call. when I use an outside phone to call the E1 connected to the sangoma a102, I instantly get a fast busy tone. My /etc/zaptel.conf is: loadzone=us defaultzone=us #Sangoma A102 port 1 [slot:1 bus:4 span: 1] span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 My /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf is: [trunkgroups] [channels] context=default usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=ye...

...678,2,Playback(Welcome) ... 12345678 = The DID number you are calling to reach E1 Idris -----Original Message----- From: Erick Perez [mailto:eaperezh at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 7:03 AM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.23 and Sangoma a102 no incoming calldetected Hi, after many issues we finally managed to make our system do outgoing calls with perfect quality. However I cannot detect *any* form of incoming call. when I use an outside phone to call the E1 connected to the sangoma a102, I instantly get a fast busy tone. My /etc/zap...

...mail: dzh@comx.dk -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af mattf Sendt: 09 May 2005 14:21 Til: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Emne: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Sangoma A102 cards testing FIXED Hello, Have you tried the wanpipe-beta8c-2.3.3.tgz release in the custom/2.3.3 dir on their FTP site? Also, have you contacted Sangoma for support? They are very responsive. I am using wanpipe-beta8a-2.3.3.tgz and it's been working great on my A104 for a week now. MATT--...

...pipe-beta8a-2.3.3.tgz and it's been working great on my A104 for a week now. MATT--- -----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Zhukovski [mailto:DZH@comx.dk] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 5:20 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: SV: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Sangoma A102 cards testing FIXED Ok, I have tested with almost all versions both in 2.3.2--*-stable and 2.3.3-*-beta - I am getting same messages: May 9 10:55:26 WARNING[3961]: chan_zap.c:1925 pri_find_dchan: No D-channels available! Using Primary on channel anyway 16! and same Down state pb01*CLI> p...

I've replaced 2XTE110 with an A102 with echo cancellation specifically to deal with echo problems. However, user feedback has indicated to me that on some calls (not a lot, but some) the call is unusable, with audio artifiacts, described by one user, as: "very bad phasing reverb & feedback (from my rock & roll days)&quo...

Hello, in our company we are trying to do this: Fax <--> Traditional PBX <--> Asterisk <--> PSTN In practice, we have put an Asterisk equipped with a Sangoma A102 (2 PRI ports) between our PBX (Siemens HiCom) and the PSTN in order to have a VoIP network along the traditional telephony network. The problem is with the fax. We just want to send and receive faxes from/to our fax machine connected to the Siemens (without needing any interaction with our VoIP ne...

Hi! I've went through the READMEs and could not answer this question: During installation, the Setup program asks: Would you like update/upgrade wanpipe drivers? (y/n) For a pure Asterisk TDM installation - is it required to patch the kernel or is this only when using the sangoma cards as WAN router? regards klaus

...________________________________ Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af Chris Mason (Lists) Sendt: 06 May 2005 14:10 Til: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Emne: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Sangoma A102 cards testing FIXED > I have got same problem with Sangoma A102 and didn't get how did you fix a problem? Can anybody explain? I have been working with Sangoma on a A101 installation and the fixes they came up with will be rolled into a new beta they are releasing in the next day...

Shortly, I'll be purchasing a Sangoma A102. I'm wondering if I should spring for the hardware echo cancellation circuit or not. Upon initial implementation, the 2 T1 Ports will be used as a passthrough as we slowly transition off of a legacy PBX. Eventually, we'll only be using one of the ports, and will be providing VoIP service...

...ent it and post it to the list if it works. thanks for the good eye. -----Original Message----- From: Michael L. Young [mailto:myoung@acsacc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:37 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Sangoma A102 w/ EC module gets intermittent echo/audio artifacts < Zaptel.conf: < loadzone = us < span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs < span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs < bchan=1-23 < dchan=24 < bchan=25-47 < dchan=48 Just a quick thought in looking at the settings above, it appears that you have set both spans...

...F_CLOCK = 1 zaptel.conf: span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs span=2,0,0,esf,b8zs -----Original Message----- From: Michael L. Young [mailto:myoung@acsacc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:37 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Sangoma A102 w/ EC module gets intermittent echo/audio artifacts < Zaptel.conf: < loadzone = us < span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs < span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs < bchan=1-23 < dchan=24 < bchan=25-47 < dchan=48 Just a quick thought in looking at the settings above, it appears that you have set both spans...

Any benefit on getting the PCI Express version? Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070222/62f79910/attachment.htm

Does anyone have any experience ith configureing the sangoma A102 card for testing using a e1 cross cable i've configured and installed the cards properly even the lights on the card are green which proves that my cross cable is properly built too. my problem is with asterisk which gives me these errors PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6)on Primary D-channel of sp...

Hello, I would like to convert an objects list such as objects() or ls() that outputs "a101" "a102" "a104" "a107" "a109" to read within a list statement as follows : list(a101,a102,a104,a107,a109) Thanks Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&gt...

Aha, it just happened to me, so now I can characterize the audio: It basically sounds like it's missing every other sample - fuzzy and distorted. Timing?

Thanks to help on this list and Sangoma's support we have incoming and outgoing calls passing through asterisk. However both incoming and outgoing calls are greeted by silence. I've noted our existing config below with our test extensions.conf. Help much appreciated Rory Zaptel ----------------------------------------------------------------------- loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk #Sangoma

I have a new Sangoma A102 and I'm trying to get it running in asterisk. A look through the dmesg log shows the card is detected and the various channels created. However, when I start asterisk I get the error below. Any ideas? My zapata.conf is below. Thanks, MD == Registered custom function SIPCHANINFO == Reg...

...come up. He finds out that this is an asterisk system and says that to get this working, I'm going to need to turn on "call-by-call" trunking. Have any of you heard of this? I certainly haven't. A quick google search doesn't turn up anything. Thoughts? This is a Sangoma A102 card, by the way. In this case, though, I don't think that's of any relevance. -Erik -- Erik Anderson http://andersonfam.org

...... A105 OK LIST completed Also, it turns out that some users have mail in "mail" and some in "Mail". So for now, with Dovecot, I've set: mail_location = mbox:~:INBOX=/var/mail/%u:INDEX=%h/Mail/imapd-indices But users with absolute paths are having issues: A102 LIST "/home/dp/mail/" "%" A102 OK List completed. Versus: A103 LIST "mail/" "%" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "mail/" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "mail/sent-mail-Jul-2006" * LIST (\No...