search for: 3.0.10

Hi List! I've got a problem building samba 3.0.10 on Solaria 9 box. Configuration is successful with ./configure --with-pam --with-syslog --with-ldapsam --with-automount But make gives the following output. alien> make Using FLAGS = -O -Iinclude -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.10/source/include -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.10/source/ubiqx -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.10/source/smbwrapper

Greetings, I've used samba for many years now on various platforms and its worked very well. I'm now trying to use 'virtual servers' to combine several smb servers on one machine and have been following the clear and simple instructions here: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch04_07.html (I've also cross-referenced these instructions with various posts to

We are using samba 3 on NetBSD with security=domain authenticating against Windows 2003. We have a username map of "root = administrator". In all previous versions of samba tested (2.2.x and 3.0.x), this means when we log on as administrator, we have root access and see the root share. With 3.0.10, we are continually prompted for a password. Log from 3.0.7 below: [2005/01/06 14:25:58,

idmapping changes from 3.0.10 to 3.4.2. Trying to transition from 3.0.10 to 3.4.2 with a minimal change to the system meaning it would be nice to only change the smb.conf file if possible. The new version doesn't seem to properly work. getent passwd only produces entries from /etc/passwd. Sometimes, getent passwd user will get results but usually they don't. Also, when winbindd (ves

Or maybe it was the upgrade from FC2 -> FC4.......... I recently was running a FC2 Samba PDC and OpenLDAP, using Samba-3.0.10. After I upgraded the server from FC2 to FC4 samba was broken and wouldn't load because it was complaining about a library file not existing. (libldap.so.2) I believe.. Sure enough it wasn't there. So I had to recompile Samba 3.0.10 again. Well the compile

Hello All, I have been trying all afternoon to rebuild the Samba RPM for my Fedora 3 with the MySQL passdb support and from what I can see it only needs the inclusion of "--with-expsam=mysql" in the SPEC file in addition to the regular ones. The problem is that no matter what version of Samba I try to rebuild, it always gice an error at the same place:

Hi people. I use centos on many my servers and they are running samba which comes with centos: samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9 From samba-3.0.10 to 3.0.23c many thnigs in code had change. Many bug fixes etc., code rewrote (for example oplock in later version of samba than 3.0.10). RedHat people don't have made a full of backports to their samba, only security things. So I have question, what do

Since I upgraded from RedHat 9.0b / Samba 2.2.8 to Samba 3.0.10 I have problems with the roaming profiles of my students. Although the log-files show no errors at all, several users reports me that they are loosing files. One time I saw the problem myself, when a user logged in and had not a single file in her 'Personal Files' after logging out and logging in on the same host the whole

I have just taken over a redhat system with Samba 3.0.0 configured with security = user, and domain logins enabled. I've included the smb.conf at the end of this message. I would like to upgrade to 3.0.10 for a numbers of reasons, one being security and one being that password changes don't work from workstation machines because of the Windows KB828741 patch. What I want to know, is if I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've uploaded a new draft of the printing patch for 3.0.10 to http://www.samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.10/ The only change is a small fix to fix the register_message_flags() error messages in the logs. After some thought, I think this might address the 'jobs failing to be removed from the queue list' bug. If people could test and let

I want to uninstall the default version of firefox, however there appears to be 2 of the same rpm's installed and its complaining.. I've been in Solaris land for the last 5 years and my rpm skills aren't the most current; how is this achieved? [root at canthus ~]# rpm -q -a firefox firefox-3.0.10-1.el5.centos firefox-3.0.10-1.el5.centos [root at canthus ~]# rpm -e

Dear List Members We are currently using samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2-x86_64 on RedHat AS 4. And it seems that we are suffering of the same problems reported here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-April/104335.html problems with the service pack 1 for windows 2003 [2005/04/25 02:06:33, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(993) api_pipe_bind_req: unknown auth type 1 requested.

Centos samba version is 3.0.10 which is the package that comes with the disto - is the only way to upgrade to the latest samba 3.0.24 is to recompile the samba source? I have tried "yum update samba" however it says 3.0.10 is the latest so i downloaded 3.0.24 and tried rpm -Uvh or yum localinstall but i get the following dependency errors to # yum install

I am having trouble connecting to a Centos 4.1 machine. I have the following installed: samba-common-3.0.10-1.4E samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2 samba-client-3.0.10-1.4E samba-swat-3.0.10-1.4E.2 Currently running: smbd nmbd winbind My smb.conf is as follows: # Global parameters [global] preferred master = No domain master = No wins support = Yes encrypt passwords = yes

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Problem Description ============== Open and close without saving EXCEL files causes time stamp updated Problem occurs on both samba versions 3.0.4 and 3.0.10 I am looking for a solution to this problem. I would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance Xuan

Building syslinux against gnu-efi 3.0.10 currently fails with: syslinux/efi/main.c:33:8: error: unknown type name ?jmp_buf? 33 | static jmp_buf load_error_buf; | ^~~~~~~ syslinux/efi/main.c: In function ?local_boot?: syslinux/efi/main.c:189:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ?longjmp? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 189 | longjmp(&load_error_buf, 1); |

Hi, I want to move from Samba 2.2.12 to 3.0.10. I downloade the 3.0.10 sources and compiled them (Solaris 8). Everything went fine. After the install, I tested the new 3.0.10 Samba with the old smb.conf from 2.2.12 (the docs say this should work). I could not log in anymore. I switched back to 2.2.12 and tried the 3.0.10 install on a Suse Linux 8.0 - with the same results. I used most parts from

Alex, I could not agree more with you. BTW, perhaps you already know, but just in case: If you want to see the patches applied to a package during its history, and you don't need to dig into the sources themselves, you can query the changelog for an rpm package without having to download sources: rpm -q --changelog package for example for my samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2 rpm -q --changelog samba *

1. Does anyone know what may be happening here? When I try to map a drive from a PC, I get the following error: "The account is not authorized to log in from this station.". I can map the drive just fine from my PC. Does anyone know what may be going on here? Any help would be greatly appreciated. 2. Also, whenever I use SWAT, it takes a long time for the information to be