jancio_wodnik@wp.pl
2006-Sep-29 09:40 UTC
[Samba] samba in centos 4.4: samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9 versus the latest from sernet samba3-3.0.23c-30
Hi people. I use centos on many my servers and they are running samba which comes with centos: samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9 From samba-3.0.10 to 3.0.23c many thnigs in code had change. Many bug fixes etc., code rewrote (for example oplock in later version of samba than 3.0.10). RedHat people don't have made a full of backports to their samba, only security things. So I have question, what do you think samba people, should i switch to the latest samba from sernet (for example) or still use samba, wchich comes with my centos. What are + and - ? Best regards, Irens
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
2006-Sep-29 13:43 UTC
[Samba] samba in centos 4.4: samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9 versus the latest from sernet samba3-3.0.23c-30
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/29/2006 06:34 AM, jancio_wodnik@wp.pl escreveu:> Hi people. > > I use centos on many my servers and they are running samba which comes > with centos: samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9 > > From samba-3.0.10 to 3.0.23c many thnigs in code had change. Many bug > fixes etc., code rewrote (for example oplock in later version of samba > than 3.0.10). RedHat people don't have made a full of backports to their > samba, only security things. > > So I have question, what do you think samba people, should i switch to > the latest samba from sernet (for example) or still use samba, wchich > comes with my centos. What are + and - ?It is a very personal decision. Running the last version has advantages and disandvantages and it is not only about Samba, in any software. You will have features and the support of the upstream developers on the last changes, but you will also face the "fresh shiny bugs". AFAIK, Samba provides rpm binary packages that you could use, there is also Fedora packages. Depending on the size of your network and time to take care of that, compiling each new version of Samba could become a pain. If 3.0.10 is working for you and you have the security updates and you don't need the new features, I would say that you should stay with it (be aware that the upgrade path will be harder and harded as your actual running versions is getting too far from upstream).> Best regards, > IrensKind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <felipe@paranacidade.org.br> Coordenadoria de Tecnologia da Informa??o (CTI) - SEDU/PARANACIDADE http://www.paranacidade.org.br/ Phone: (+55 41 3350 3300) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHSLdCj65ZxU4gPQRArxSAKCLjeZhnCVRYFc2Tid3SKM0QzwcHQCeJc/3 wub4z/BE7Up9DHUh/ICXjeA=qYAP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----