Displaying 20 results from an estimated 89 matches for "24kbps".
Did you mean:
64kbps
2004 Aug 06
1
bitrate for slow modems
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, John Griffiths wrote:
> ok so 24kbps for 56k modems...
>
> can i go any lower and get the 28 k modems? (still a lot of them about) or will 24 be good enough fo that?
As others have said, 16kbps should do the trick. Keep in mind though that
the quality of the sound will also depend on the sampling rate. MP3 will
handle some hi...
2004 Aug 06
3
bitrate for slow modems
...ng, for 28.8 I would go 16kbps and be
really safe...
Lithium
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Griffiths" <john@capmon.com>
To: <icecast@xiph.org>
Cc: <icecast@xiph.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:12 PM
Subject: [icecast] bitrate for slow modems
> ok so 24kbps for 56k modems...
>
> can i go any lower and get the 28 k modems? (still a lot of them about) or
will 24 be good enough fo that?
>
> At 04:57 PM 4/4/2001 -0700, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> >> >
> >> > the bitrate on the mp3's is 128 (great for listening off the HD)...
2004 Aug 06
6
what I'd like to do
> >
> > the bitrate on the mp3's is 128 (great for listening off the HD)
> >
> > whats a good bitrate to encode for streaming audio?
>
> I think this might be the problem 128kbps isn't going to work over a modem.
>
> I think 24kbps is probably the pratical limit for 56k modems. 56k modems might
> be able to get a 32kbps stream but only under optimal conditions.
I believe he said the outgoing stream was two 128k ISDN lines, which
from my ISDN memory I remember as actually having a 112k throughput (the
other channel being u...
2005 Sep 07
2
AACPlus Shoutcast v1.90
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:56:06PM -0500, Jay Krivanek wrote:
> Yea, don't get me wrong, ogg is definitely an awesome format but aacplus v2
> is currently the leader in high fidelity quality at low bitrates. 24kbps
> aacplus even kicks ass in my view.
Is that 24kbps AACPLUS a full 44.1kHz stereo signal with frequencies
preserved up to at least 15kHz? (Just curious, not criticising.)
As a datapoint, Vorbis aotuv b4 gives acceptable quality with q=-1.001
44.1kHz stereo at approximately 44kbps.
--
Paul...
2001 Sep 10
1
modem quality stream for Peter....
I've set up a 24kbps/MONO Ogg stream which is doing the same metadata
updates that Lithium's stream is doing...it can be used to test this nasty
winamp (and other clients) crashing thing that has popped up of late....
hopefully, 24kbps is low enough for modem listeners (especially ones who
happen to have writte...
2002 Nov 26
1
Low bitrates
Hi,
I want to encode audio at very low bitrates.
however, vorbis_encode_init() does not allow me to set bitrates below 32kbps. How can i
set 24kbps?
Thanks,
Flo
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubs...
2005 Dec 30
0
streaming to dialup users gives low quality audio
...sed lame to encode the tracks to mp3 and used it's
> standard preset while doing it. In my ices.conf file for the dialup stream i
> originally had a samplerate of 22050, two chanels, and a bitrate of 24.
This is going to sound pretty horrible, since MP3 can't really do 22.05kHz
at 24kbps stereo.
> I
> changed the bitrate up to 56, which resulted in a noticeable audio increase
> in quality but the buffering was unacceptable. If anyone has settings that
> work i would be interested in hearing about them.
You're not going to be able to send 56kbps over a modem, as...
2005 Dec 30
7
streaming to dialup users gives low quality audio
Hello,
I've got two streams, one for broadband, one for dialup. Well, having
had occation to use a dialup connection recently i checked the dialup
stream. Although it was streaming what the broadband stream was, the audio
quality was audibly worse. It didn't buffer, but it didn't sound as clear as
the broadband stream. I used lame to encode the tracks to mp3 and used it's
2004 Aug 06
1
memory, processor, bandwidth
...base requirements. Don't set the listener count higher than you need,
> it just screws things up.
I seem to remember having read 32 kB for each icecast client, but maybe
I'm wrong
>
> * Enough bandwidth to run the server. If you want to broadcast to 100
> listeners at 24kbps, you'll need about 24kbps*100 = 2,400kbps = 2.4Mbps
> of bandwidth. That's about 2 T1 lines worth of bandwidth. Trying to
> push 100 128kbps listeners down your 768kbps cable modem isn't going
> to work :)
Why would this one be different ?
hth.
Jerome Alet - Medicine...
2004 Aug 06
0
bitrate for slow modems
ok so 24kbps for 56k modems...
can i go any lower and get the 28 k modems? (still a lot of them about) or will 24 be good enough fo that?
At 04:57 PM 4/4/2001 -0700, Jack Moffitt wrote:
>> >
>> > the bitrate on the mp3's is 128 (great for listening off the HD)
>> >
>> &g...
2004 Aug 06
0
bitrate for slow modems
...on
;) scnr
uno
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Griffiths" <john@capmon.com>
> To: <icecast@xiph.org>
> Cc: <icecast@xiph.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:12 PM
> Subject: [icecast] bitrate for slow modems
>
>
> > ok so 24kbps for 56k modems...
> >
> > can i go any lower and get the 28 k modems? (still a lot of them about) or
> will 24 be good enough fo that?
> >
> > At 04:57 PM 4/4/2001 -0700, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > the bitrate on the mp3's is 1...
2004 Aug 06
0
Updating show titles (was Re: a new directory service)
...ny way to overcome this, either
using icecast 1 or 2.
I'm involved in a project called ACB radio interactive
(http://interactive.acbradio.org) which consists of a number of DJ's from
all over the world taking it in turn to use a common server. We currently
broadcast using live365
at 16 or 24kbps in either mono or stereo, depending on the broadcaster's
resources and preferences. However, we're looking to change to a model
where we'd have 2 servers, one accepting connections at any rate (including
broadband rates) and passing that off to a live365 server, whilst at the
same time...
2005 Sep 07
0
AACPlus Shoutcast v1.90
Yes it is 44.1kHz. However SBR is not the original, everything higher then
22.05kHz is recreated. Also Parametric Stereo recreates the Stereo
experience. The actual audio data is simply a 24kbps AAC stream at 22050
mono. Also it is by no means perfect. The highs do have an artificial feel
to them and a little echo. For what it is though most people don't really
get annoyed by it and are quite pleased with the feel of it.
-----Original Message-----
From: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [ma...
2001 Nov 04
3
how many streams can icecast handle ?
hi everyone
For my diploma work on streaming music, I'm looking into
cost of handling a large amount of users.
Somehow I couldnt find some experience on the net about
how many concurrent streams a single box could handle
using icecast (without encoding, just the streaming
of pre-encoded mp3-files).
Does anybody have some experience that I could include
as a reference point ?
Thanks !
2004 Aug 06
2
a new directory service
Xavier Montero wrote:
> Hello. About your idea, I think that it is important for a radio
> to "check" multiple styles.
>
> I'm planning to cast a couple or 3 of stations that are _not_
> monographic and will be "sports" from x to y hours, "pop" from
> y to z hours, "talk" from z to p hours and so on.
I think Xavier has pointed out the
2005 Sep 06
5
AACPlus Shoutcast v1.90
I'm am currently using autuvb4 at q-2 mono 44100. This produces roughly
28 to 34kb/s. It's ok but I've heard AACPlus at 32kb/s stereo and it's
definately better, unfortunately.
Regards,
Ross.
>> I'm hoping that Monty and others can improve Vorbis to start
>> competing
>> with AAC+ at low bitrates. Monty said he had some ideas but I wonder
>> if
2004 Aug 06
8
disappointed with group
Hi all,
must say I have found the help in this group very disapointing. Have
mail numerous times for help with some (in hindsight) simple problems.
yet no one (ok 1 person) has attempted to aid me.
If this group was ONLY filled with novices and users I could accept this
but I have seen members of the development team , and others who have
insight into the workings of icecast comment on other
2004 Aug 06
2
what I'd like to do
ok... topology.
486 with 10BaseT card hooking into 10/100 hub hooking into 10/100 switch hooking into cisco router combining two 128KbpsISDN lines into a consolidated 256kbps line.
listening on my desktop machine is fine, also 10baseT into the same hub as the server.
the bitrate on the mp3's is 128 (great for listening off the HD)
whats a good bitrate to encode for streaming audio?
At
2004 Aug 06
0
how many streams can icecast handle ?
...s very little in the way of resources. Your outgoing
bandwidth will almost certainly be the limiting factor. Just divide your
available bandwidth by the bitrate of your stream (& lop off about 5% of
that number for overhead & a safety margin) .
Example: a T1 line = 1.54 mbps = 1540 kbps / 24kbps (stream bitrate) = 64
streams
So a T-1 line can support 64 24kbps streams (in theory). In practice, about
60
-bg
> hi everyone
>
> For my diploma work on streaming music, I'm looking into
> cost of handling a large amount of users.
>
> Somehow I couldnt find some experience...
2004 Aug 06
0
memory, processor, bandwidth
...egabytes of RAM), plus whatever your
operating system needs for overhead, plus 1.5MB for the server's
base requirements. Don't set the listener count higher than you need,
it just screws things up.
* Enough bandwidth to run the server. If you want to broadcast to 100
listeners at 24kbps, you'll need about 24kbps*100 = 2,400kbps = 2.4Mbps
of bandwidth. That's about 2 T1 lines worth of bandwidth. Trying to
push 100 128kbps listeners down your 768kbps cable modem isn't going
to work :)
<p>Is it the same rules for Icecast??
Thank you in advance.
--
CHRIST...