On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 20:29 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> On 21/05/2019 20:15, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 17:44 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > There was some talk of this happening automatically, but this > > > seems > > > to > > > have not come to fruition yet. > > > > It has. See the bootstrap/ system in master. > > Okay, I will > > > > This hasn't been backported to Samba 4.10 however. > > Seeing as how lots of people have been having problems building > 4.10.x, > don't you think backporting it might just be a good idea ?I though it was such a good idea I already suggested it. It didn't get any traction at the time, but perhaps with your enthusiasm someone might do the work. Particularly since we got CentOS7 working in master. The task is essentially to cherry-pick all the changes under bootstrap/ and then adjust the package list to also include the py2 packages.> > The files in generated-dists are intended to be linkable from the > > wiki > > as the definitive list of packages for a developer install, which > > will > > always be a superset of packages needed in production. > > > > So for 4.11 onwards we can finally get rid of the mostly-but-not- > > entirely-accurate package lists in the wiki and replace with what > > we > > test with. > > I can see a problem already, whilst it is a good idea to always > build > the newest version of Samba, people are contrary, they will want to > build earlier versions. This will possibly mean that the wikipage > will > not list the python2 packages required to build Samba 4.10.x and > earlier.Between you and me I'm sure we can come up with a clear structure. Most likely a table of versions vs distributions with a link to each. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 07:43 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote:> > Between you and me I'm sure we can come up with a clear structure. > Most likely a table of versions vs distributions with a link to each.I made a start on this here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba#Verified_Package_Dependencies It includes a protected page (given the links) here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verified_Package_Dependencies I hope we will see bootstrap backported so we can fill out 4.10 in there, as that is causing most of the confusion, otherwise at least we will be set up for 4.11 when shipped. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
krb5-kdc needed in debian? Looks wrong to me.> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Andrew Bartlett via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 28 mei 2019 11:56 > Aan: Rowland penny; sambalist > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] official package lists: the future > > On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 07:43 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > > > Between you and me I'm sure we can come up with a clear structure. > > Most likely a table of versions vs distributions with a > link to each. > > I made a start on this here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required > _to_Build_Samba#Verified_Package_Dependencies > > It includes a protected page (given the links) here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verified_Package_Dependencies > > I hope we will see bootstrap backported so we can fill out 4.10 in > there, as that is causing most of the confusion, otherwise at least we > will be set up for 4.11 when shipped. > > Andrew Bartlett > -- > Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ > Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org > Samba Developer, Catalyst IT > http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > >
On 28/05/2019 10:55, Andrew Bartlett wrote:> On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 07:43 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> Between you and me I'm sure we can come up with a clear structure. >> Most likely a table of versions vs distributions with a link to each. > I made a start on this here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba#Verified_Package_DependenciesYes, I noticed ;-)> > It includes a protected page (given the links) here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verified_Package_Dependencies > > I hope we will see bootstrap backported so we can fill out 4.10 in > there, as that is causing most of the confusion, otherwise at least we > will be set up for 4.11 when shipped. > > Andrew BartlettThe only problem I foresee is that the people that read the wiki seem to be very good at missing hyperlinks ;-) Rowland
On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 12:02 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:> krb5-kdc needed in debian?For the MIT KDC build yes. As it says, this the full list needed for our CI, it will include more packages, but not less packages, than a production install will need. Improvements to the bootstrap system are welcome, perhaps finding a way to tag some packages as for CI only, while somehow still verifying the 'production' sub-list. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
Hai Andres,> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org] > Verzonden: dinsdag 28 mei 2019 12:05 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] official package lists: the future > > On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 12:02 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > > krb5-kdc needed in debian? > > For the MIT KDC build yes. > > As it says, this the full list needed for our CI, it will include more > packages, but not less packages, than a production install will need. > > Improvements to the bootstrap system are welcome, perhaps > finding a way > to tag some packages as for CI only, while somehow still verifying the > 'production' sub-list. > > Andrew Bartlett > --Yes, my thoughts are same. The output of the template.py shows. # This file is generated by 'bootstrap/template.py --render' So a small note here in the --render command could do that. In that CI build, are the needed setup for vfs_nfs4_xattr and spotlight also in there, because looks like im missing these. I really need to learn to work with CI soon.. Now, I can change it all on git but my current problem is time, like most.. I normaly can pretty much just do what i think is needed but due some new things in our network, my boss changed some schedules, and my complete planning for next 3 months is gone. :-( Im also missing SambaXP now.. :-(( aarg .. Greetz, Louis