search for: verifying

...e part of the IR verifier that I don't like is it verifies module-level data in doFinalization. If we have two verifier passes in a single module pass manager, doFinalization of the two passes will run on the same module data after all passes. I followed the same model for debug info verifier: verifying debug info reachable from a function in runOnFunction and verifying module level debug info in doFinalization. But it can be time consuming (see email discussion in "Debug Info Slowing Things Down?!"), since each function can reach a lot of debug info MDNodes, some of them are shared betw...

...ike is it verifies module-level >> data in doFinalization. If we have two verifier passes in a single module >> pass manager, doFinalization of the two passes will run on the same module >> data after all passes. >> >> I followed the same model for debug info verifier: verifying debug info >> reachable from a function in runOnFunction and verifying module level debug >> info in doFinalization. But it can be time consuming (see email discussion >> in "Debug Info Slowing Things Down?!"), since each function can reach a lot >> of debug info M...

...r that I don't like is it verifies module-level > data in doFinalization. If we have two verifier passes in a single module > pass manager, doFinalization of the two passes will run on the same module > data after all passes. > > I followed the same model for debug info verifier: verifying debug info > reachable from a function in runOnFunction and verifying module level debug > info in doFinalization. But it can be time consuming (see email discussion > in "Debug Info Slowing Things Down?!"), since each function can reach a lot > of debug info MDNodes, some of...

...owing errors: # samba-tool drs showrepl SPNEGO(gssapi_krb5) creating NEG_TOKEN_INIT failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER is usually associated with DNS update issues. 2. I had to update "objectGUID CNAME Record" as defined here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record 3. querying the domain name in the DNS shows up only the old DC # host biuro.gpm-vindexus.pl biuro.gpm-vindexus.pl has address 192.168.0.251 biuro.gpm-vindexus.pl has address 192.168.1.251 (it has 2 addresses in 2 subnets) and it should show 192.168.0.252 (qdc, the se...

Hi, Is there any easy way to run the verifier between each pass in opt if I do e.g. opt -O3 foo.ll -o foo.opt.ll ? If I add -verify after -O3 I get one invocation of the verifier first in the FunctionPass manager and then get two (!) runs of the verifier after all other passes are run. Then I saw the flag -verify-each which sounds promising, the help text says - Verify after each

Further to my previous email, I now have some answers. The culprit is the IR verifier. 1. opt -time-passes does not report time spent in the IR verifier. If I add -disable-verify, opt's run time drops from 71 seconds to 37 seconds. 2. -disable-verify doesn't disable all verification runs. The IR verifier is run 3 times: once prior to any optimization work, once between running the

yes, I tried working with samba wiki and quad-verifying what is recommended to be checked. OK, I'll try to join using 18.04. the samba_dnsupdate tool does not have the --use-samba-tool option in ubuntu 16.04 2018-04-25 22:47 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:32:10 +0200 > Jakub Kul...

Hello all, I came across the code of Verifier, and see that it doesn't modify the IR at all. Why it is not considered as an analysis pass? Actually, this will have impact on debugify-each and print-before/after-all: we are not supposed to print/debugify Verifier pass, but since Verifier is declared as a transformation (well, a non-analysis) pass, we actually do print/debugify it. Thanks for

...> SPNEGO(gssapi_krb5) creating NEG_TOKEN_INIT failed: > NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER > > NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER is usually associated with DNS update > issues. > > 2. I had to update "objectGUID CNAME Record" as defined here > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record Yes, but you shouldn't have to do this with 4.7.6, it has code to create those records during the join > > 3. querying the domain name in the DNS shows up only the old DC > # host biuro.gpm-vindexus.pl > biuro.gpm-vindexus.pl has address 192.168.0.251...

Hi llvm, 1) The lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp in 2.7 implements Verifier::VerifyType, which is empty in 2.6. I noticed that it does not check all types, for example, UnionTyID, OpaqueTyID, LabelTyID, MetadataTyID and etc are ignored in the 'default' branch. Does it mean we dont need to check them? Another question is: How much does Verifier.cpp check statically? Can I take it as a type checker

On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:35 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jun 25, 2013, at 9:15 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> Any suggestion on how to move this

Hello, Is there anyway to disable the module verifier pass (in llvm-ld and llc)? I got an error as " Instruction does not dominate all uses!". Obviously, there must be something wrong. The module verifier simply aborts `llvm-ld` instead of generating bytecode. If somehow I can disable the module verifier, then I can use llc to produce LLVM assembly code for my program. This will help

Hi, I hope someone can help me with the following problem. I followed the following guides to setup samba as an additional active directory server to my windows server with bind9 dns: https://www.tecmint.com/join-additio...r-replication/<https://www.tecmint.com/join-additional-ubuntu-dc-to-samba4-ad-dc-failover-replication/>

Hi Anton, I ran llc with -verify-coalescing. There were no error messages. Then I added code in MipsPassConfig::addPreEmitPass() to prevent machine verifier from running post delay -slot-filler, and ran llc again. Again, there were no error messages. This is the list of passes run after post-RA scheduling. machine verifier is run twice after post RA scheduler (and CriticalAntiDepBreaker) is run.

Zheng Wang wrote: > Hello, > > Is there anyway to disable the module verifier pass (in llvm-ld and llc)? > > I got an error as " Instruction does not dominate all uses!". > Obviously, there must be something wrong. The module verifier simply > aborts `llvm-ld` instead of generating bytecode. If somehow I can > disable the module verifier, then I can use llc to

...sync When created this way, rsync running on an intel Core2Duo based Mac will not preserve creation date/time. I've tested this with backupbouncer 0.1.3: ------------------ rsync3-maclemon-beta ------------------ This copier produced log output in: /Volumes/Dst/81-rsync3-maclemon-beta/log Verifying: basic-permissions ... ok (Critical) Verifying: timestamps ... ok (Critical) Verifying: symlinks ... ok (Critical) Verifying: symlink-ownership ... ok Verifying: hardlinks ... ok (Important) Verifying: resource-forks ... Sub-test: on fil...

John Criswell wrote: > Zheng Wang wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there anyway to disable the module verifier pass (in llvm-ld and llc)? >> >> I got an error as " Instruction does not dominate all uses!". >> Obviously, there must be something wrong. The module verifier simply >> aborts `llvm-ld` instead of generating bytecode. If somehow I can

...--modify-window=1 > /Volumes/Src/ /Volumes/FAT32/DST > sudo rsync -vaNHAXx --fileflags --force-change --modify-window=1 > /Volumes/FAT32/DST/ /Volumes/Dst/ > > and then compared the results with > sudo bbouncer verify /Volumes/Src /Volumes/Dst > > Here are the results: > Verifying: basic-permissions ... FAIL (Critical) > Verifying: timestamps ... stat: ./some-file: stat: No such > file or directory > FAIL (Critical) > Verifying: symlinks ... ok (Critical) > Verifying: symlink-ownership ... FAIL > Verifying: hardlinks ....

Hi, how can I use Rails ActionController::Verification#verify :params when the hash key is in a hash? E.g.: params[:form][:textfield] and I want to verify that :textfield is a key in params[:form] Thanks Markus

Hi All, I have spent couple of days trying to work-out this problem with not luck. I am working on a Linux Fedora 14. I ssh from the server to the client using teh IP with no problem. Client: # puppetd --server puppet --waitforcert 60 --test --verbose info: Creating a new SSL key for bar03 warning: peer certificate won''t be verified in this SSL session warning: peer certificate