On 15/09/2018 10:44 pm, Andrew Bartlett wrote:> On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 12:52 +1000, Reuben Farrelly via samba wrote:>> The system is a Gentoo Linux x86_64 kept very up to date. The server >> is >> a VM which has one interface that has 4 IPv4 and IPv6 addresses on >> it, >> as well as a second vNIC (currently used for backups only with no >> hosts >> on it right now). >> >> Can anyone please assist in getting to the bottom of what appears to >> be >> a nasty bug? I'm keen to work on getting to the root cause of this. > > Can you try reverting 3a383038ee7f74e5a9d2326a761b27950a14eb83? > > nmbd does not change much, and this is one of the few changes between > 4.8 and 4.9. > > I've attached such a revert (it probably won't go to list recipients) > for your testing. > > Thanks, > > Andrew Bartlett >Cool. That seems to have fixed things both in the scenario of "domain master = yes" set (my initial config) as well as the case of that parameter now not explicitly defined. In both cases Samba now starts up normally and uneventfully. Thanks, Reuben
On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 23:44 +1000, Reuben Farrelly via samba wrote:> > On 15/09/2018 10:44 pm, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 12:52 +1000, Reuben Farrelly via samba wrote: > > > > > > > > The system is a Gentoo Linux x86_64 kept very up to date. The > > > server > > > is > > > a VM which has one interface that has 4 IPv4 and IPv6 addresses > > > on > > > it, > > > as well as a second vNIC (currently used for backups only with no > > > hosts > > > on it right now). > > > > > > Can anyone please assist in getting to the bottom of what appears > > > to > > > be > > > a nasty bug? I'm keen to work on getting to the root cause of > > > this. > > Can you try reverting 3a383038ee7f74e5a9d2326a761b27950a14eb83? > > > > nmbd does not change much, and this is one of the few changes > > between > > 4.8 and 4.9. > > > > I've attached such a revert (it probably won't go to list > > recipients) > > for your testing. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > > Cool. That seems to have fixed things both in the scenario of > "domain > master = yes" set (my initial config) as well as the case of that > parameter now not explicitly defined. > > In both cases Samba now starts up normally and uneventfully.Can you please file a bug? I think we will have to patch this pretty urgently. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
On 15/09/2018 11:49 pm, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote:> On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 23:44 +1000, Reuben Farrelly via samba wrote: >> >> On 15/09/2018 10:44 pm, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 12:52 +1000, Reuben Farrelly via samba wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The system is a Gentoo Linux x86_64 kept very up to date. The >>>> server >>>> is >>>> a VM which has one interface that has 4 IPv4 and IPv6 addresses >>>> on >>>> it, >>>> as well as a second vNIC (currently used for backups only with no >>>> hosts >>>> on it right now). >>>> >>>> Can anyone please assist in getting to the bottom of what appears >>>> to >>>> be >>>> a nasty bug? I'm keen to work on getting to the root cause of >>>> this. >>> Can you try reverting 3a383038ee7f74e5a9d2326a761b27950a14eb83? >>> >>> nmbd does not change much, and this is one of the few changes >>> between >>> 4.8 and 4.9. >>> >>> I've attached such a revert (it probably won't go to list >>> recipients) >>> for your testing. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Andrew Bartlett >>> >> Cool. That seems to have fixed things both in the scenario of >> "domain >> master = yes" set (my initial config) as well as the case of that >> parameter now not explicitly defined. >> >> In both cases Samba now starts up normally and uneventfully. > > Can you please file a bug? > > I think we will have to patch this pretty urgently.No problem. Filed as https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Thanks, Reuben