Hi, I have detected a very low performance with cp command or any write with CIFS mount (Netapp Storage), <15mb/s. Read performance is similar Local disk perofrmance is correct >100mb/s fstab entry is : //netapp/resource$/folder /mnt/test cifs username=u,password=p,domain=dom,iocharset=utf8,uid=1001,gid=1000,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,auto Server is SLES 12 SP3 with latest updates and samba samba-client-32bit-4.6.13+git.72.2a684235f41-3.21.3.x86_64 cifs-utils-6.5-9.3.2.x86_64 Any suggestion? Thanks
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 08:22:41PM +0200, Trenta sis via samba wrote:> Hi, > > I have detected a very low performance with cp command or any write > with CIFS mount (Netapp Storage), <15mb/s. Read performance is similar > > Local disk perofrmance is correct >100mb/s > > fstab entry is : > //netapp/resource$/folder /mnt/test cifs > username=u,password=p,domain=dom,iocharset=utf8,uid=1001,gid=1000,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,auto > > Server is SLES 12 SP3 with latest updates and samba > samba-client-32bit-4.6.13+git.72.2a684235f41-3.21.3.x86_64 > cifs-utils-6.5-9.3.2.x86_64 > > Any suggestion?If you're running against NetApp storage, the Samba server is irrelevent (not being used). Have you tried using smbclient to test read/write performance to the NetApp ? If that is also slow then you have 2 different clients with the same problem. Time to look closely at the server...
Hi, How can I test with smbclient? any example? Thanks 2018-06-15 20:25 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>:> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 08:22:41PM +0200, Trenta sis via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have detected a very low performance with cp command or any write >> with CIFS mount (Netapp Storage), <15mb/s. Read performance is similar >> >> Local disk perofrmance is correct >100mb/s >> >> fstab entry is : >> //netapp/resource$/folder /mnt/test cifs >> username=u,password=p,domain=dom,iocharset=utf8,uid=1001,gid=1000,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,auto >> >> Server is SLES 12 SP3 with latest updates and samba >> samba-client-32bit-4.6.13+git.72.2a684235f41-3.21.3.x86_64 >> cifs-utils-6.5-9.3.2.x86_64 >> >> Any suggestion? > > If you're running against NetApp storage, the Samba server > is irrelevent (not being used). Have you tried using > smbclient to test read/write performance to the NetApp ? > If that is also slow then you have 2 different clients > with the same problem. Time to look closely at the server...
Maybe Matching Threads
- Slow write performance CIFS mount
- server not using utf8-mode with Synology client
- Cannot mount Windows 7 share with CIFS Error 112 Host is down
- incomplete smbmount smbfs Win98SE iso8859-1 translation in kernel 2.4.18
- [PATCH] smbfs: smbfs do not honor uid, gid, file_mode and dir_mode supplied by user mount