search for: perofrmance

Hi, I have detected a very low performance with cp command or any write with CIFS mount (Netapp Storage), <15mb/s. Read performance is similar Local disk perofrmance is correct >100mb/s fstab entry is : //netapp/resource$/folder /mnt/test cifs username=u,password=p,domain=dom,iocharset=utf8,uid=1001,gid=1000,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,auto Server is SLES 12 SP3 with latest updates and samba samba-client-32bit-4.6.13+git.72.2a684235f41-3.21.3.x86_64 cif...

...D for login shell and home directory winbind nss info = rfc2307 allow trusted domains = yes template shell = /bin/false winbind refresh tickets = yes winbind use default domain = true winbind offline logon = false # to be removed in PROD for perofrmance reasons winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes log level = 1 passdb:5 winbind:5 auth:6 syslog = 9 syslog only = yes #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [PTA_test] path = /srv/PTA_test writable =...

...amba.org>: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 08:22:41PM +0200, Trenta sis via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have detected a very low performance with cp command or any write >> with CIFS mount (Netapp Storage), <15mb/s. Read performance is similar >> >> Local disk perofrmance is correct >100mb/s >> >> fstab entry is : >> //netapp/resource$/folder /mnt/test cifs >> username=u,password=p,domain=dom,iocharset=utf8,uid=1001,gid=1000,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,auto >> >> Server is SLES 12 SP3 with latest updates and samba >> s...

...winbind nss info = rfc2307 > allow trusted domains = yes > > template shell = /bin/false > winbind refresh tickets = yes > winbind use default domain = true > winbind offline logon = false > > # to be removed in PROD for perofrmance reasons > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > > log level = 1 passdb:5 winbind:5 auth:6 > syslog = 9 > syslog only = yes > > #============================ Share Definitions > ============================== >...

I am starting to see a few issues with OCFS and 9.2.0.3 RAC on redHat Linux AS 2.1. Wondering if there is anyone out there experiencing similar issues... a few pointers to the issues.. 1. OCFS read/write performance is way lower than a read/write to a raw device.. i can give you some comparison numbers.. 2. Writes to shared disk with ocfs would get locked up by one server.. it doesnt have to

I am starting to see a few issues with OCFS and 9.2.0.3 RAC on redHat Linux AS 2.1. Wondering if there is anyone out there experiencing similar issues... a few pointers to the issues.. 1. OCFS read/write performance is way lower than a read/write to a raw device.. i can give you some comparison numbers.. 2. Writes to shared disk with ocfs would get locked up by one server.. it doesnt have to

Hi Daniel, On April 11, 2017 at 6:22:34 PM, Daniel Berlin (dberlin at dberlin.org) wrote: > Note: This is a generic problem with any situation where noalias exists but > the pointers are proven equal :) Yes. > TBAA, for example, has the same generic issue, we just drop the tbaa > metadata and declare it okay, even though it would have been UB at the > source level. Yes.  I

Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: 1 DUP I=190 Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Ok, so I ran fsck manually (even with -y), but yet it refuses to clear/fix whatever to the questions posed as fsck runs. What does this all mean? Thanks, -Clint -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner,