samba - Mar 2015 - Domain controller in a chroot

Le 17/03/2015 10:43, Rowland Penny a ?crit :
> Hi, you could do what a lot of people do, run the DC in a VM.
>
> Rowland
>
Not really an option : :-)
              total       used       free     shared    buffers cached
Mem:           496        470         25          0 58         82

That's why I'm targetting the chroot

On 2015-03-17 10:52, S?bastien Le Ray wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 17/03/2015 10:43, Rowland Penny a ?crit :
>> Hi, you could do what a lot of people do, run the DC in a VM.
>>
>> Rowland
>>
> 
> Not really an option : :-)
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers cached
> Mem:           496        470         25          0 58         82
> 
> That's why I'm targetting the chroot
You won't be able to run a usable file server *and* DC on this little
resources anyway. That's barely enough to run either?

What are you trying to build?

-- 
Mit freundlichen Gr??en, / Best Regards,
Sven Schwedas
Systemadministrator
TAO Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45 | A - 8020 Graz
Mail/XMPP: sven.schwedas at tao.at | +43 (0)680 301 7167
http://software.tao.at

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 648 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150317/9796e775/attachment.pgp>

Le 17/03/2015 11:06, Sven Schwedas a ?crit :
> Not really an option : :-)
>               total       used       free     shared    buffers cached
> Mem:           496        470         25          0 58         82
>
> That's why I'm targetting the chroot
> You won't be able to run a usable file server *and* DC on this little
> resources anyway. That's barely enough to run either?
>
I'm sucessfully running a fileserver on it, just wanting to avoid issues 
in case of network link outage.
DC overhead shouldn't be that huge since it is only used uppon session 
opening (we can upgrade memory though)