Le 17/03/2015 10:43, Rowland Penny a ?crit :> Hi, you could do what a lot of people do, run the DC in a VM. > > Rowland >Not really an option : :-) total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 496 470 25 0 58 82 That's why I'm targetting the chroot
On 2015-03-17 10:52, S?bastien Le Ray wrote:> > > Le 17/03/2015 10:43, Rowland Penny a ?crit : >> Hi, you could do what a lot of people do, run the DC in a VM. >> >> Rowland >> > > Not really an option : :-) > total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 496 470 25 0 58 82 > > That's why I'm targetting the chrootYou won't be able to run a usable file server *and* DC on this little resources anyway. That's barely enough to run either? What are you trying to build? -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en, / Best Regards, Sven Schwedas Systemadministrator TAO Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45 | A - 8020 Graz Mail/XMPP: sven.schwedas at tao.at | +43 (0)680 301 7167 software.tao.at -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 648 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150317/9796e775/attachment.pgp>
Le 17/03/2015 11:06, Sven Schwedas a ?crit :> Not really an option : :-) > total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 496 470 25 0 58 82 > > That's why I'm targetting the chroot > You won't be able to run a usable file server *and* DC on this little > resources anyway. That's barely enough to run either? >I'm sucessfully running a fileserver on it, just wanting to avoid issues in case of network link outage. DC overhead shouldn't be that huge since it is only used uppon session opening (we can upgrade memory though)