On 06/03/15 17:05, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:> Am 06.03.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> From 'samba-tool testparm -v' : >>> >>> server max protocol = NT1 >>> >>> BUT 'man smb.conf' says this : >>> >>> Default: server max protocol = SMB3 >>> >>> OK, one of these is wrong, but which ??? > If you run 4.1 or later, then SMB3 is the default. > > > > Am 06.03.2015 um 16:30 schrieb James: >> Using Wireshark I see the protocol used as SMB2. Using a Windows >> workstation I tested by navigating to files and folders on my member >> server or to my sysvol folder on a DC. > Win7 doesn't speak SMB3. > > SMB 2.0 was introduced by Vista/2008 > SMB 2.1 by Win7/2008R2 > SMB 2.2 aka 3.0 by Win8/2012 > SMB 3.02 by 8.1/2012R2 > > > Regards, > MarcOK, so I sorted my problem, it was the old 'testparm -v' and 'samba-tool testparm -v' giving different results problem, the man page is correct. Sorry for the noise :-) Rowland
OK. Now I'm really confused. I was not aware of two 'testparm' commands. Running 'testparm -v' shows correct default values. So whats the difference? On 3/6/2015 12:20 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:> On 06/03/15 17:05, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >> Am 06.03.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>> From 'samba-tool testparm -v' : >>>> >>>> server max protocol = NT1 >>>> >>>> BUT 'man smb.conf' says this : >>>> >>>> Default: server max protocol = SMB3 >>>> >>>> OK, one of these is wrong, but which ??? >> If you run 4.1 or later, then SMB3 is the default. >> >> >> >> Am 06.03.2015 um 16:30 schrieb James: >>> Using Wireshark I see the protocol used as SMB2. Using a Windows >>> workstation I tested by navigating to files and folders on my member >>> server or to my sysvol folder on a DC. >> Win7 doesn't speak SMB3. >> >> SMB 2.0 was introduced by Vista/2008 >> SMB 2.1 by Win7/2008R2 >> SMB 2.2 aka 3.0 by Win8/2012 >> SMB 3.02 by 8.1/2012R2 >> >> >> Regards, >> Marc > > OK, so I sorted my problem, it was the old 'testparm -v' and > 'samba-tool testparm -v' giving different results problem, the man > page is correct. > > Sorry for the noise :-) > > Rowland-- -James
I have to add noise: Provisioning a DC with sernet 4.1.x called NT1 as max default with me. Am 6. M?rz 2015 18:28:55 MEZ, schrieb James <lingpanda101 at gmail.com>:>OK. Now I'm really confused. I was not aware of two 'testparm' >commands. >Running 'testparm -v' shows correct default values. So whats the >difference? > > >On 3/6/2015 12:20 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 06/03/15 17:05, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>> Am 06.03.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>>> From 'samba-tool testparm -v' : >>>>> >>>>> server max protocol = NT1 >>>>> >>>>> BUT 'man smb.conf' says this : >>>>> >>>>> Default: server max protocol = SMB3 >>>>> >>>>> OK, one of these is wrong, but which ??? >>> If you run 4.1 or later, then SMB3 is the default. >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 06.03.2015 um 16:30 schrieb James: >>>> Using Wireshark I see the protocol used as SMB2. Using a Windows >>>> workstation I tested by navigating to files and folders on my >member >>>> server or to my sysvol folder on a DC. >>> Win7 doesn't speak SMB3. >>> >>> SMB 2.0 was introduced by Vista/2008 >>> SMB 2.1 by Win7/2008R2 >>> SMB 2.2 aka 3.0 by Win8/2012 >>> SMB 3.02 by 8.1/2012R2 >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Marc >> >> OK, so I sorted my problem, it was the old 'testparm -v' and >> 'samba-tool testparm -v' giving different results problem, the man >> page is correct. >> >> Sorry for the noise :-) >> >> Rowland > >-- >-James > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hallo, James, Du meintest am 06.03.15:> OK. Now I'm really confused. I was not aware of two 'testparm' > commands. Running 'testparm -v' shows correct default values. So > whats the difference?testparm -s shows what is defined in "smb.conf" testparm -sv shows what ist actually used (including the default values). Viele Gruesse! Helmut