search for: nt1

Second request ... Thank you in advance ... - Mike Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 2:16 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host name to IP address for SMB2 but not NT1 We are having issues with smbclient 4.0.7 not working to clusters, because it's resolving the host name ( 'default service = dev3k1.my.domain.com' in smb.conf file ) to an IP address using SMB2, but does not do it if is uses NT1( our desired behavior ). Is there a way to turn off reso...

...? -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:38 AM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host name to IP address for SMB2 but not NT1 On 20/04/15 15:19, Tompkins, Michael wrote: > Second request ... > > Thank you in advance ... > - Mike > > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 2:16 PM > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host name to IP address for SMB2 but not NT1 > &gt...

Hi all, I have just been reading an article on the asterisk-doc site about ISDN X-Over cables. The article mentioned the converting of an NT1 to make this possible, has anybody got the information required to modify a BT NT1? Or any information on the BT NT1. Thanks in advance. Regards Dave

Hello, My DC smb.conf currently has the following set server max protocol = NT1 server min protocol = CORE client max protocol = NT1 client min protocol = CORE Is it safe to change both the client and server max to = SMB3? What about on member servers? Should I be concerned with anything breaking? I'm using Windows 7 clients to authenticate against...

...e dot files = yes printing = BSD max protocol = SMB2 min protocol = SMB2 [projects] path = /W/Projects browseable = yes public = yes guest ok = yes read only = no force user = user force group = user The speed is fine with this configuration, around 100Mbyte/s. If I change protocol to NT1, the speed drops to around 50Mbyte/s. This is from man page: NT1: Current up to date version of the protocol. Used by Windows NT. Known as CIFS. SMB2: Re-implementation of the SMB protocol. Used by Windows Vista and newer. The Samba implementation of SMB2 is currently marked experimental! Why...

I would like to know how to view a samba server on a different subnet than the client workstation resides. For example, I have a Samba 1.9.18p3 server in subnet 'a' and a NT 4.0 client in subnet 'b'. The Samba server does not show up when the NT client double-clicks on the Network Neighborhood. However, if the client does a Find:computer it will find the server, and shares can be

Given an existing NT4 Samba 4 DC, a recently upgraded Win10 machine can no longer access NETLOGON to authenticate to the network. This lead to the research revealing that my Samba4 PDC SMB.CONF must be changed to limit MAX PROTOCOL = NT1 to avoid negotiating a version of SMB2 from Win10 that Samba4 can't resolve. Doing this broke authentication via other resources that no longer support NT1, so am I correct in inferring that the only option at this point to get Win10 domain logins with a later version of SMB (greater than NT1...

Hello We have a problem with our Windows 10 Clients. Installed on a SLES12 Server is samba v4.4 I can bind the clients to the domain without any problem. Afterwards I want to login in the domain, I get the error, no logonserver available I can change in the smb conf max protocol to NT1 -> now it is possible to login with user xxx in the domain We don't want to use our samba server with the NT1 setting, so I will delete this setting Now it is still possible to login with user xxx , but if I want to login with another user, I get the same error message no logonserver ava...

...and it has >> been working well. We are running a NT4-style Samba PDC for our domain >> controller. This server is running the CentOS packages for Samba 4.2.10-6 >> as a domain member. My issue is that I have one Windows 7 workstation that >> will only auto-negotiate to the NT1 protocol. If I run smbstatus, all of >> my >> other workstations use SMB2_10, as expected. >> >> Has anyone seen this before? Is there a log file I can look at to >> determine >> what is going wrong in the protocol negotiation? >> >> Thanks! >>...

...and added it to my domain last week and it has been working well. We are running a NT4-style Samba PDC for our domain controller. This server is running the CentOS packages for Samba 4.2.10-6 as a domain member. My issue is that I have one Windows 7 workstation that will only auto-negotiate to the NT1 protocol. If I run smbstatus, all of my other workstations use SMB2_10, as expected. Has anyone seen this before? Is there a log file I can look at to determine what is going wrong in the protocol negotiation? Thanks! --Bill

Good catch. I had set server max protocol to NT1 after upgrading from samba 3.x to 4.x . Some windows clients had problems with SMB2 and file shares (tho this should not really be an issue with the domain controllers.) I have now set the dc's to server max protocol = SMB2 server min protocol = NT1 and the client...

...e them here.? Trying everything I can but can't make it change. Help is very much appreciated. testparm -s Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Loaded services file OK. Weak crypto is allowed Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE # Global parameters [global] ??????? client max protocol = NT1 ??????? client min protocol = NT1 ??????? log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m ??????? logging = file ??????? map to guest = Bad User ??????? max log size = 1000 ??????? name resolve order = wins host bcast ??????? obey pam restrictions = Yes ??????? pam password change = Yes ??????? panic act...

Setting my domain controllers to use SMB2 breaks windows domain authentication for Windows clients. I don't know why. The clients in question are Windows 7 and Windows 2008 R2. Once I set the domain controllers and problem member server to server max protocol = NT1 server min protocol = NT1 client max protocol = NT1 client min protocol = NT1 the domain join problem went away. I don't know what would happen if I had the member servers use server max protocol = SMB2 server min protocol = NT1 Presumably that...

Hello, I currently run samba with server min protocol = NT1 but I need to move towards server min protocol = SMB2 is there any way I can detect which clients still use the older protocol versions? I would like to estimate the impact of the change before i do close NT1/SMB1. Thank and kind regards, Heiner Billich

...? On my DC I have these issues with my group policy files. I'm hopeful using smb 2.0 will fix this problem. Thanks. On 3/4/2015 3:55 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: > I have several Samba 3.6.24 domain controllers/file servers . > > > Server1 - Solaris 10, Samba 3.6.24, max protocol NT1. This is > the main file server. > Server2 - Solaris 10, Samba 3.6.24, max protocol SMB2. 2ndary file > server, not as heavily used as as server1. > Server3 - Solaris 11, Samba 3.6.24, max protocol SMB2 . This was > set up to replace Server 1. > > > I also have a...

...inal Message----- > From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:38 AM > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host name to IP address for SMB2 but not NT1 > > On 20/04/15 15:19, Tompkins, Michael wrote: >> Second request ... >> >> Thank you in advance ... >> - Mike >> >> >> >> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 2:16 PM >> To: samba at lists.samba.org >> Subject: smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host...

...ing a NT4-style Samba PDC for > our domain > controller. This server is running the CentOS packages for > Samba 4.2.10-6 > as a domain member. My issue is that I have one Windows 7 > workstation that > will only auto-negotiate to the NT1 protocol. If I run > smbstatus, all of my > other workstations use SMB2_10, as expected. > > Has anyone seen this before? Is there a log file I can look at > to determine > what is going wrong in the protocol negotiation? > > T...

Hi everybody, I have an euro-isdn bri line with it's own NT1. I connect to the NT1 my * box using a cologne chip pci card ( I run bri-stuff RC4a) and another pc ( a linux box used as proxy, firewall etc.). All seems to work fine, but when I'm surfing the internet during a telephone call ( in such situations both boxes are connected and both NT1 b-...

A coworker and I have been doing some performance tuning with Samba 20b4 under Linux 2.0.36 (RedHat 5.2 distribution) on a 100-T network. The protocol is NT1. Two settings are tweaked in particular, "read raw" and "write raw". When both are yes, reading a large file results in 6M/s, but writing is only 2M/s, which is far below writing to an NT server (6M/s). If any of "read raw" or "write raw" is off, the result...

Hi, I'm running Samba 3.0.14a on Debian Sarge, The Samba server is member of a windows2000 Domain, named NT1 Problem that I have is that, when setting up the rights on a directory, and checking the option to change the rights on the subdirectories and files, after a while the rights are no more here, and I have to set them new... Hope somebody can help me... [global] unix charset = LOCALE workgroup =...