MargoAndTodd
2009-Apr-06 20:45 UTC
[Samba] Is it permissible to file bugs on old versions?
Hi All, I am using CentOS 5.3 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 clone). CentOS and RHEL being what they are, they always use old stuff to maintain enterprise stability. $rpm -qa \*samba\* samba-common-3.0.33-3.7.el5 system-config-samba-1.2.41-3.el5 samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5 samba-client-3.0.33-3.7.el5 Is it permissible to file bugs on these old version, seeing as Samba is up to 3.3.3? (And, no, I can not upgrade until CentOS puts it in YUM.) Many thanks, -T
Matthias Grimm
2009-Apr-07 15:55 UTC
[Samba] Is it permissible to file bugs on old versions?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 06.04.2009 22:45, schrieb MargoAndTodd:> Hi All, > > I am using CentOS 5.3 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 clone). > CentOS and RHEL being what they are, they always use old > stuff to maintain enterprise stability.> Is it permissible to file bugs on these old version, > seeing as Samba is up to 3.3.3? (And, no, I can > not upgrade until CentOS puts it in YUM.)I would file a bug against CentOS' packages... For the 5.x-version it will stay in 3.0.x, I think the next shift to 3.2/3.3 will be in CentOS6.. But why not use sernet's packages? I'm using them on 5 servers myself w/o problems. Cheers Matthias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAknbd08ACgkQf3LySRiTg2wGUQCeInEzGLNrFEuQcXjEqI2LEFbR aD4AoIVwHmAwzrOk9oRd3knP5aJ4KKV5 =Ig45 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----