samba news
2007-Jul-25 15:47 UTC
[Samba] Problems with oplocks (samba 3.0.24, Kernel 2.6.17)
Hi list! We migrated from FreeBSD 5.2 with Samba 3.0.22 to samba 3.0.24 on Linux, Kernel 2.6.17. Some users are running foxpro programms on XP and W2K and have problems now concerning locked files. The old FreeBSD server never had such poornesses. I couldn?t find a solution searching the web but I tried out this smb.conf options: kernel oplocks = yes fake oplocks = No locking = Yes oplocks = Yes veto oplock files = /*.DBF/*.dbf/*.MDX/*.mdx/*.NDX/*.ndx/ level2 oplocks = Yes oplock contention limit = 2 posix locking = Yes strict locking = Yes share modes = Yes Nothing helped. The questions now are: Is it possible to run samba on Linux with clients using dbf without this hassles? If so: How can I accomplish that? Or is the only/easier way to go back to FreeBSD? Hints and help would be much appreciated! Regards, Oliver
Beschorner Daniel
2007-Jul-26 12:54 UTC
[Samba] Problems with oplocks (samba 3.0.24, Kernel 2.6.17)
The Linux kernels 2.6.17 - 2.6.17.11 have a bug with kernel oplocks that hits Samba and shows your symptoms. A kernel update or "kernel oplocks = no" may solve it. Daniel
Helmut Hullen
2007-Aug-06 19:44 UTC
[Samba] Problems with oplocks (samba 3.0.24, Kernel 2.6.17)
Hallo, Beschorner, Du (Daniel.Beschorner) meintest am 26.07.07:> The Linux kernels 2.6.17 - 2.6.17.11 have a bug with kernel oplocks > that hits Samba and shows your symptoms. > A kernel update or "kernel oplocks = no" may solve it.Kernel update seems not to help - on a school in the neighbourhood my collegue had the "oplock" problems with Samba 3.0.22 and kernel 2.6.21.5. Tomorrow we will know wether "oplocks = no" does help. Viele Gruesse! Helmut