Guinness2702
2006-Dec-03 15:27 UTC
[Samba] Samba permissions error and other odd behaviour (RFH)
Hi, can anybody help me with the following please:- I've have just migrated to a new server (old FC5, new FC6). I have migrated my samba config from the old box. As far as I can see, the config is correct (I hardly changed anything), but samba logs a "/mnt/share" permission denied error when I try to connect. When I changed the path of the share to "/tmp/share" it worked. The permissions/ownership of the directories are all identical, and yet it works with one and not the other. The other strange behaviour I noticed is that although I could copy a file from the client to the tmp share, the client could not see any of the files I manually added (on the server) to the share. Even if I rebooted both client and server (and indeed connected from a different client), only the file I had copied to the share from a client was visible. I renamed the file on the server, and the client picked up this change. (/mnt/share) is just a different ext3 partition mount point, and my non-root user can access it on the server so I don't believe there is a problem with the mount parameters - default). Has anybody seen this behaviour before, or can anybody give me a pointer as to what I might need to do to get it working? Thanks, Steve -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Samba-permissions-error-and-other-odd-behaviour-%28RFH%29-tf2742961.html#a7653186 Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Guinness2702
2006-Dec-03 15:27 UTC
[Samba] Samba permissions error and other odd behaviour (RFH)
Guinness2702 wrote:> > Hi, can anybody help me with the following please:- > > I've have just migrated to a new server (old FC5, new FC6). I have > migrated my samba config from the old box. > > [snip] >Well after lots of experimenting, and more googling, I got it sussed, and thought I'd pass on the info in case it ever helps anyone else. It turns out that Fedora Core 6 has something called SELinux. Now I don't know much about it exactly, but it seems from my testing/debugging that this adds some extra kernel level security into the system. Disabling this allowed me to access my samba shares (hint: you could probably change it's settings rather than the big switch off, but I figure this sort of thing is going to come and bite me again in the future, so off it goes). -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Samba-permissions-error-and-other-odd-behaviour-%28RFH%29-tf2742961.html#a7658048 Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
- [LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
- [LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
- [LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
- [LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt