Steve A
2006-Mar-31 18:50 UTC
[Samba] \\<server>\<share> is not accessible. The network path was not found.
I am running Samba 3.0.21b-2 on Fedora Core 5. I created a new Unix user called sa using useradd -G users -m sa, and added the smbuser using smbpasswd -a sa (and set the same password just in case). The password is also the same as my Windows password. When I try to access the shares on Samba from my XP-SP2 machine, I get the following error: "\\<server>\<share> is not accessible. You might nor have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. The network path was not found." Either Yes/No to the "encrypted passwords = " option, and also specifying the location of the Samba password file with the "smb passwd file = " option, makes no difference. The same configuration works on a seperate XP/Gentoo box. Can anyone help please? Thanks, Steve :) --- Here is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP [homes] comment = Home Directory for %S read only = No browseable = No [public] comment = Public access path = /export/public read only = No
Craig White
2006-Mar-31 20:25 UTC
[Samba] \\<server>\<share> is not accessible. The network path was not found.
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 19:45 +0100, Steve A wrote:> I am running Samba 3.0.21b-2 on Fedora Core 5. > > I created a new Unix user called sa using useradd -G users -m sa, and added > the smbuser using smbpasswd -a sa (and set the same password just in case). > The password is also the same as my Windows password. > > When I try to access the shares on Samba from my XP-SP2 machine, I get the > following error: > > "\\<server>\<share> is not accessible. You might nor have permission to use > this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out > if you have access permissions. The network path was not found." > > Either Yes/No to the "encrypted passwords = " option, and also specifying > the location of the Samba password file with the "smb passwd file = " > option, makes no difference. > > The same configuration works on a seperate XP/Gentoo box. Can anyone help > please?----- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux Craig
Steve A
2006-Mar-31 21:09 UTC
[Samba] Re: \\<server>\<share> is not accessible. The network pathwas not found.
"Craig White" <craigwhite@azapple.com> wrote in message news:1143836702.21658.99.camel@lin-workstation.azapple.com...> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinuxThank you so much Craig... I have disabled SELinux for now, it is too much to learn SELinux and Linux at the same time! Cheers, Steve :)