Hello!
I have one directiry, that contains about 4000 some other directory.
When we update our system to kernel 2.6.11 and samba 3.0.20, listing
this directory take more time and smbd process use 40-70% CPU. What
can we do to reduce CPU load? Previos system: kernel 24.29 and samba
2.0, cpu load by one smbd proccess has no more 10%.
our config:
[global]
security = share
debug timestamp = yes
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
syslog=0
load printers = No
unix extensions = no
os level = 255
announce version = 5.4
domain logons = no
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
local master = Yes
protocol = NT1
wins proxy = yes
oplocks = False
lock dir = /var/lock/samba
guest account = ftp
invalid users = root secoff
unix charset = KOI8-R
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
#test perfomance
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_RCVBUF=65536
IPTOS_LOWDELAY
use sendfile = no
lock spin time = 15
lock spin count = 100
--
Best regards,
Ilya mailto:ilya@3ka.mipt.ru
Ilya Sapunov schrieb:>Hello! >I have one directiry, that contains about 4000 some other directory. >When we update our system to kernel 2.6.11 and samba 3.0.20, listing >this directory take more time and smbd process use 40-70% CPU. What >can we do to reduce CPU load? Previos system: kernel 24.29 and samba >2.0, cpu load by one smbd proccess has no more 10%. > > >our config: >[global] > security = share > debug timestamp = yes > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > syslog=0 > load printers = No > unix extensions = no > os level = 255 > announce version = 5.4 > domain logons = no > preferred master = Yes > domain master = Yes > local master = Yes > protocol = NT1 > wins proxy = yes > oplocks = False > lock dir = /var/lock/samba > guest account = ftp > invalid users = root secoff > unix charset = KOI8-R > encrypt passwords = yes > smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd >#test perfomance > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_RCVBUF=65536 IPTOS_LOWDELAY > use sendfile = no > lock spin time = 15 > lock spin count = 100 > > > >Hi, use only lower or upper case feature in samba, this should give you the wanted speed, look at smb faqs for this Regards