-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I was running a netbench performance test against Samba 3.0.11, and the test has not been able to complete fully. The samba logs contain lines such as this: [2005/02/28 11:35:23, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(645) ~ slave16 (192.168.133.116) connect to service netbench initially as user BENCHLAB+slave16 (uid=10016, gid=10001) (pid 6599)[2005/02/28 11:41:14, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) ~ tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 86 ltype=0 (Resource deadlock avoided) [2005/02/28 11:45:48, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) ~ tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 41 ltype=0 (Resource deadlock avoided) [2005/02/28 11:51:15, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) ~ tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 86 ltype=0 (Resource deadlock avoided) Does this mean that we need to increase some parameter? Is there a known failure in this area, or could it be a misconfiguration of the clients? I'll be rerunning this test with more detailed logging as I try to track this issue down. Kernel 2.4.29 Samba 3.0.11 XFS filesystem -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCI4WP2dxAfYNwANIRAr2nAJ96qgoGOLviIphRYLL0N9nuUdIMuACfdPS5 qj8OJRdVwU+cxiQlGaRTDZU=cNWi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:56:47PM -0800, Tom Dickson wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I was running a netbench performance test against Samba 3.0.11, and the > test has > not been able to complete fully. > > The samba logs contain lines such as this: > > [2005/02/28 11:35:23, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(645) > ~ slave16 (192.168.133.116) connect to service netbench initially as user > BENCHLAB+slave16 (uid=10016, gid=10001) (pid 6599)[2005/02/28 11:41:14, 0] > tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) > ~ tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 86 ltype=0 > (Resource > deadlock avoided) > [2005/02/28 11:45:48, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) > ~ tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 41 ltype=0 > (Resource > deadlock avoided) > [2005/02/28 11:51:15, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) > ~ tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 86 ltype=0 > (Resource > deadlock avoided) > > Does this mean that we need to increase some parameter? Is there a known > failure > in this area, or could it be a misconfiguration of the clients? > > I'll be rerunning this test with more detailed logging as I try to track > this > issue down. > > Kernel 2.4.29 > Samba 3.0.11 > XFS filesystemNot a current known problem. As far as I know this should work. Jeremy.