AFAIR, security = server is somewhat frowned upon as compared to security
= ads or domain. I'd check the docs, though, especially for that param.
I'm sure it will be more than obvious.
---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | novosirj@umdnj.edu - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, David Reta wrote:
> We are currently running a Windows 2003 Domain with Active Directory in
Native Mode. I will be implementing a new Unix File Server that I would like
accessabli via Windows. It has been some time since I've played with Samba
and I know there are new features incorporated that allow interaction with newer
windows domains. Before I get started should I be using security = server or
security = ads?
>
> Thanks,
> David
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>