Installing and probing samba-3.0.10 stable like fileserver (and 3.0.11stable too), we?ve registered impossibility to login us into a PDC samba using the "user@domain" format. The validation was successfully using "user_domain" format. The PDC samba (version 2.2.12) is running over a Freebsd 4.10-RELEASE-p5.... Have anyone some news related? Greetings.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Romeo wrote: | Installing and probing samba-3.0.10 stable like fileserver | (and 3.0.11stable too), we?ve registered impossibility | to login us into a PDC samba using the "user@domain" | format. The validation was successfully using | "user_domain" format. The PDC samba (version 2.2.12) | is running over a Freebsd 4.10-RELEASE-p5.... | Have anyone some news related? | Greetings. Samba acts as an NT4 DC , not an AD DC. cheers, jerry ====================================================================Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCB9DUIR7qMdg1EfYRAk1lAJ0WludOkx5nuyHXOMJviL/eM14RNwCcCTjn ZwoWETsacCr3p+dx0EfudAk=Dtd6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Nevertheless with a file server samba-3.0.7, drawback is not present. Greetings, Daniel. "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Daniel Romeo wrote: > | Installing and probing samba-3.0.10 stable like fileserver > | (and 3.0.11stable too), we?ve registered impossibility > | to login us into a PDC samba using the "user@domain" > | format. The validation was successfully using > | "user_domain" format. The PDC samba (version 2.2.12) > | is running over a Freebsd 4.10-RELEASE-p5.... > | Have anyone some news related? > | Greetings. > > Samba acts as an NT4 DC , not an AD DC. > > cheers, jerry > ====================================================================> Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org > GnuPG Key ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc > "I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCB9DUIR7qMdg1EfYRAk1lAJ0WludOkx5nuyHXOMJviL/eM14RNwCcCTjn > ZwoWETsacCr3p+dx0EfudAk> =Dtd6 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Romeo wrote: | Nevertheless with a file server samba-3.0.7, drawback | is not present. Greetings, Daniel. File Server vs. PDC are different things. You cannot logon to a Samba Domain using username@domain syntax from a Windows client. cheers, jerry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCB9fOIR7qMdg1EfYRAo2kAKDHvSZoF9s3uv4oG3r9U5T5LiKV+ACg8zUX vSDy60kRKJfjpBfkCvIRDNY=dpq7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
We did it and we do it translating @ to _ in /usr/local/samba/private/username.map (user_domain = user@domain) in the PDCserver (Linux and BSD) and Fileservers (microsoft and unix?s family), but the question is other: Until samba-3.0.7 it?s possible. Anything have changed. "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Daniel Romeo wrote: > > | Nevertheless with a file server samba-3.0.7, drawback > | is not present. Greetings, Daniel. > > File Server vs. PDC are different things. > You cannot logon to a Samba Domain using > username@domain syntax from a Windows client. > > cheers, jerry > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCB9fOIR7qMdg1EfYRAo2kAKDHvSZoF9s3uv4oG3r9U5T5LiKV+ACg8zUX > vSDy60kRKJfjpBfkCvIRDNY> =dpq7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----