-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Would it not be possible to make the archive bit map to a Posix extended ACL instead of to the execute bit? - -Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBWDuj2dxAfYNwANIRAvmnAJ4r1Q/2X7YyPKgGWbnnB3pv6WKDjwCgn+Vd 8USnnc35+uAa2GxUmejlDBc=Bu48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 09:11:15AM -0700, Tom Dickson wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Would it not be possible to make the archive bit map to a Posix extended > ACL instead of to the execute bit?Yes, we already do this in fact... Jeremy.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Dickson [mailto:tdickson@inostor.com]> Would it not be possible to make the archive bit map to a > Posix extended ACL instead of to the execute bit?If I remember right, there's support in Samba 3 for it to be stored in an extended user attribute (EA) instead of in the permissions. This is probably the cleanest way to do it, since it's not a permission per se.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What version begins to do this? Does it change what map archive = yes does in the smb.conf? - -Tom Jeremy Allison wrote: | On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 09:11:15AM -0700, Tom Dickson wrote: | |>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |>Hash: SHA1 |> |>Would it not be possible to make the archive bit map to a Posix extended |>ACL instead of to the execute bit? | | | Yes, we already do this in fact... | | Jeremy. | | . | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBWE2k2dxAfYNwANIRArGrAJ9Tk2cg78Ssd3D46X2sep9YKNdoMQCfasFZ nNme1ZQJdy5q6tWtd5Qbjik=BAc7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----