Kalnichevski, Oleg
2004-Aug-12 13:35 UTC
[Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers?
Good ${time of the day} I have just been wondering if anyone would know if Samba is compatible with the CIFS implementation of the Network Appliance DataONTAP filers? http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/ontap.html I have so far unable to connect to any shared folder on the NetApp filer that require authentication. An attempt to access or list shared resources on the NetApp filer fails with the following error message. session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE I am running Fedora Core 2 * kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 * samba client 3.0.3-5 NetApp F85 filer running NetApp Release 6.3.2 Did anyone have better luck getting Samba to work with NetApp filers? Any pointers would be really appreciated Oleg PS: I'll happily produce the debug trace if that could help pinpoint the problem *************************************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system. ***************************************************************************************************
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:> > Good ${time of the day} > > I have just been wondering if anyone would know if Samba is compatible with the CIFS implementation of the Network Appliance DataONTAP filers? > > http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/ontap.html > > I have so far unable to connect to any shared folder on the NetApp filer that require authentication. An attempt to access or list shared resources on the NetApp filer fails with the following error message. > > session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE > > I am running Fedora Core 2 > * kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 > * samba client 3.0.3-5 > > NetApp F85 filer running NetApp Release 6.3.2 > > Did anyone have better luck getting Samba to work with NetApp filers?Yes, can you send a debug level 10 trace please ? We're here in the CIFS interop lab along with NetApp, so now is a good time to do this. Jeremy.
Kalnichevski, Oleg
2004-Aug-13 12:25 UTC
[Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers?
Jeremy I really appreciate your response. Please find the debug trace below. Just a few notes: I upgraded the filer's operating system from release 6.3.2 to 6.4.4R1 prior to running the test. It did not make much of a difference but I did get a different error message this time around. I am going to upgrade to the NetApp's latest and greatest stable release (6.5.1R1) and post you on the results Let me know if there's anything I could help you with Cheers, Oleg ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO: Current debug levels: all: True/10 tdb: False/0 printdrivers: False/0 lanman: False/0 smb: False/0 rpc_parse: False/0 rpc_srv: False/0 rpc_cli: False/0 passdb: False/0 sam: False/0 auth: False/0 winbind: False/0 vfs: False/0 idmap: False/0 quota: False/0 lp_load: refreshing parameters Initialising global parameters params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf" Processing section "[global]" doing parameter workgroup = BEZRHLAB doing parameter server string = Samba Server doing parameter printcap name = /etc/printcap doing parameter load printers = yes doing parameter log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log doing parameter max log size = 50 doing parameter security = server doing parameter password server = 10.131.30.30 doing parameter socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 doing parameter dns proxy = no doing parameter idmap uid = 16777216-33554431 doing parameter idmap gid = 16777216-33554431 doing parameter template shell = /bin/false doing parameter winbind use default domain = no pm_process() returned Yes lp_servicenumber: couldn't find homes set_server_role: role = ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER Attempting to register new charset UCS-2LE Registered charset UCS-2LE Attempting to register new charset UTF8 Registered charset UTF8 Attempting to register new charset ASCII Registered charset ASCII Attempting to register new charset 646 Registered charset 646 Attempting to register new charset ISO-8859-1 Registered charset ISO-8859-1 Attempting to register new charset UCS2-HEX Registered charset UCS2-HEX Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE added interface ip=10.131.13.118 bcast=10.131.13.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Netbios name list:- my_netbios_names[0]="LOCALHOST" Client started (version 3.0.3-5). Connecting to 10.131.30.32 at port 445 socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 0 socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 0 socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 socket option SO_RCVBUF = 16384 socket option SO_SNDLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_RCVLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_SNDTIMEO = 0 socket option SO_RCVTIMEO = 0 session request ok write_socket(3,183) write_socket(3,183) wrote 183 got smb length of 174 size=174 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=152 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2749 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[ 0]= 8 (0x8) smb_vwv[ 1]=12803 (0x3203) smb_vwv[ 2]= 256 (0x100) smb_vwv[ 3]= 1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[ 4]= 129 (0x81) smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 6]= 256 (0x100) smb_vwv[ 7]=32000 (0x7D00) smb_vwv[ 8]=48129 (0xBC01) smb_vwv[ 9]=64850 (0xFD52) smb_vwv[10]= 211 (0xD3) smb_vwv[11]=61568 (0xF080) smb_vwv[12]= 2337 (0x921) smb_vwv[13]=11217 (0x2BD1) smb_vwv[14]=50305 (0xC481) smb_vwv[15]=34817 (0x8801) smb_vwv[16]= 255 (0xFF) smb_bcc=105 [000] 15 00 00 00 CF 7F 7F 5B 23 35 B5 10 A7 D6 14 3B .......[ #5.....; [010] 60 57 06 06 2B 06 01 05 05 02 A0 4D 30 4B A0 19 `W..+... ...M0K.. [020] 30 17 06 09 2A 86 48 82 F7 12 01 02 02 06 0A 2B 0...*.H. .......+ [030] 06 01 04 01 82 37 02 02 0A A3 2E 30 2C A0 2A 1B .....7.. ...0,.*. [040] 28 62 65 7A 72 68 66 70 30 31 24 40 42 45 5A 52 (bezrhfp 01$@BEZR [050] 48 4C 41 42 2E 44 45 56 2E 42 45 41 52 49 4E 47 HLAB.DEV .BEARING [060] 50 4F 49 4E 54 2E 43 4F 4D POINT.CO M size=174 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=152 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2749 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[ 0]= 8 (0x8) smb_vwv[ 1]=12803 (0x3203) smb_vwv[ 2]= 256 (0x100) smb_vwv[ 3]= 1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[ 4]= 129 (0x81) smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 6]= 256 (0x100) smb_vwv[ 7]=32000 (0x7D00) smb_vwv[ 8]=48129 (0xBC01) smb_vwv[ 9]=64850 (0xFD52) smb_vwv[10]= 211 (0xD3) smb_vwv[11]=61568 (0xF080) smb_vwv[12]= 2337 (0x921) smb_vwv[13]=11217 (0x2BD1) smb_vwv[14]=50305 (0xC481) smb_vwv[15]=34817 (0x8801) smb_vwv[16]= 255 (0xFF) smb_bcc=105 [000] 15 00 00 00 CF 7F 7F 5B 23 35 B5 10 A7 D6 14 3B .......[ #5.....; [010] 60 57 06 06 2B 06 01 05 05 02 A0 4D 30 4B A0 19 `W..+... ...M0K.. [020] 30 17 06 09 2A 86 48 82 F7 12 01 02 02 06 0A 2B 0...*.H. .......+ [030] 06 01 04 01 82 37 02 02 0A A3 2E 30 2C A0 2A 1B .....7.. ...0,.*. [040] 28 62 65 7A 72 68 66 70 30 31 24 40 42 45 5A 52 (bezrhfp 01$@BEZR [050] 48 4C 41 42 2E 44 45 56 2E 42 45 41 52 49 4E 47 HLAB.DEV .BEARING [060] 50 4F 49 4E 54 2E 43 4F 4D POINT.CO M Serverzone is -7200 Doing spnego session setup (blob length=105) got OID=1 2 840 48018 1 2 2 got OID=1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 got principal=bezrhfp01$@BEZRHLAB.DEV.BEARINGPOINT.COM write_socket(3,168) write_socket(3,168) wrote 168 got smb length of 666 size=666 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=22 smb_reh=0 smb_err=49152 smb_flg=152 smb_flg2=51207 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2749 smb_uid=2048 smb_mid=2 smt_wct=4 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 3]= 549 (0x225) smb_bcc=623 [000] A1 82 02 21 30 82 02 1D A0 03 0A 01 01 A1 0C 06 ...!0... ........ [010] 0A 2B 06 01 04 01 82 37 02 02 0A A2 82 01 01 04 .+.....7 ........ [020] 81 FE 4E 54 4C 4D 53 53 50 00 02 00 00 00 10 00 ..NTLMSS P....... [030] 10 00 30 00 00 00 05 02 89 00 4E 55 2C 79 5A CE ..0..... ..NU,y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b. [0D0] 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 66 00 70 00 30 00 31 00 e.z.r.h. f.p.0.1. [0E0] 2E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 6C 00 61 00 ..b.e.z. r.h.l.a. [0F0] 62 00 2E 00 64 00 65 00 76 00 2E 00 62 00 65 00 b...d.e. v...b.e. [100] 61 00 72 00 69 00 6E 00 67 00 70 00 6F 00 69 00 a.r.i.n. g.p.o.i. [110] 6E 00 74 00 2E 00 63 00 6F 00 6D 00 00 00 00 00 n.t...c. o.m..... [120] A3 82 01 01 04 81 FE 4E 54 4C 4D 53 53 50 00 02 .......N TLMSSP.. [130] 00 00 00 10 00 10 00 30 00 00 00 05 02 89 00 4E .......0 .......N [140] 55 2C 79 5A CE CF 1A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 BE U,yZ.... ........ [150] 00 BE 00 40 00 00 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 ...@...B .E.Z.R.H [160] 00 4C 00 41 00 42 00 02 00 10 00 42 00 45 00 5A .L.A.B.. ...B.E.Z [170] 00 52 00 48 00 4C 00 41 00 42 00 01 00 12 00 42 .R.H.L.A .B.....B [180] 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 46 00 50 00 30 00 31 .E.Z.R.H .F.P.0.1 [190] 00 04 00 3A 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 4C ...:.B.E .Z.R.H.L [1A0] 00 41 00 42 00 2E 00 44 00 45 00 56 00 2E 00 42 .A.B...D .E.V...B [1B0] 00 45 00 41 00 52 00 49 00 4E 00 47 00 50 00 4F .E.A.R.I .N.G.P.O [1C0] 00 49 00 4E 00 54 00 2E 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 03 .I.N.T.. .C.O.M.. [1D0] 00 4E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 66 00 70 .N.b.e.z .r.h.f.p [1E0] 00 30 00 31 00 2E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 .0.1...b .e.z.r.h [1F0] 00 6C 00 61 00 62 00 2E 00 64 00 65 00 76 00 2E .l.a.b.. .d.e.v.. size=666 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=22 smb_reh=0 smb_err=49152 smb_flg=152 smb_flg2=51207 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2749 smb_uid=2048 smb_mid=2 smt_wct=4 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 3]= 549 (0x225) smb_bcc=623 [000] A1 82 02 21 30 82 02 1D A0 03 0A 01 01 A1 0C 06 ...!0... ........ [010] 0A 2B 06 01 04 01 82 37 02 02 0A A2 82 01 01 04 .+.....7 ........ [020] 81 FE 4E 54 4C 4D 53 53 50 00 02 00 00 00 10 00 ..NTLMSS P....... [030] 10 00 30 00 00 00 05 02 89 00 4E 55 2C 79 5A CE ..0..... ..NU,y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b. [0D0] 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 66 00 70 00 30 00 31 00 e.z.r.h. f.p.0.1. [0E0] 2E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 6C 00 61 00 ..b.e.z. r.h.l.a. [0F0] 62 00 2E 00 64 00 65 00 76 00 2E 00 62 00 65 00 b...d.e. v...b.e. [100] 61 00 72 00 69 00 6E 00 67 00 70 00 6F 00 69 00 a.r.i.n. g.p.o.i. [110] 6E 00 74 00 2E 00 63 00 6F 00 6D 00 00 00 00 00 n.t...c. o.m..... [120] A3 82 01 01 04 81 FE 4E 54 4C 4D 53 53 50 00 02 .......N TLMSSP.. [130] 00 00 00 10 00 10 00 30 00 00 00 05 02 89 00 4E .......0 .......N [140] 55 2C 79 5A CE CF 1A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 BE U,yZ.... ........ [150] 00 BE 00 40 00 00 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 ...@...B .E.Z.R.H [160] 00 4C 00 41 00 42 00 02 00 10 00 42 00 45 00 5A .L.A.B.. ...B.E.Z [170] 00 52 00 48 00 4C 00 41 00 42 00 01 00 12 00 42 .R.H.L.A .B.....B [180] 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 46 00 50 00 30 00 31 .E.Z.R.H .F.P.0.1 [190] 00 04 00 3A 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 4C ...:.B.E .Z.R.H.L [1A0] 00 41 00 42 00 2E 00 44 00 45 00 56 00 2E 00 42 .A.B...D .E.V...B [1B0] 00 45 00 41 00 52 00 49 00 4E 00 47 00 50 00 4F .E.A.R.I .N.G.P.O [1C0] 00 49 00 4E 00 54 00 2E 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 03 .I.N.T.. .C.O.M.. [1D0] 00 4E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 00 66 00 70 .N.b.e.z .r.h.f.p [1E0] 00 30 00 31 00 2E 00 62 00 65 00 7A 00 72 00 68 .0.1...b .e.z.r.h [1F0] 00 6C 00 61 00 62 00 2E 00 64 00 65 00 76 00 2E .l.a.b.. .d.e.v.. Got challenge flags: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x00890205 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 NTLMSSP_CHAL_TARGET_INFO NTLMSSP: Set final flags: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x00080215 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 NTLMSSP challenge set by NTLM2 challenge is: [000] 26 4C 6B 86 3A AA E2 1C &Lk.:... NTLMSSP Sign/Seal - Initialising with flags: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x00080215 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 write_socket(3,252) write_socket(3,252) wrote 252 got smb length of 158 size=158 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=34823 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2749 smb_uid=2048 smb_mid=3 smt_wct=4 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 3]= 23 (0x17) smb_bcc=115 [000] A1 15 30 13 A0 03 0A 01 00 A1 0C 06 0A 2B 06 01 ..0..... .....+.. [010] 04 01 82 37 02 02 0A 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F ...7...W .i.n.d.o [020] 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 .w.s. .5 ...0...W [030] 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 .i.n.d.o .w.s. .2 [040] 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 .0.0.0. .L.A.N. [050] 00 4D 00 61 00 6E 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 .M.a.n.a .g.e.r.. [060] 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 4C 00 41 00 42 .B.E.Z.R .H.L.A.B [070] 00 00 00 ... size=158 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=34823 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2749 smb_uid=2048 smb_mid=3 smt_wct=4 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 3]= 23 (0x17) smb_bcc=115 [000] A1 15 30 13 A0 03 0A 01 00 A1 0C 06 0A 2B 06 01 ..0..... .....+.. [010] 04 01 82 37 02 02 0A 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F ...7...W .i.n.d.o [020] 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 .w.s. .5 ...0...W [030] 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 .i.n.d.o .w.s. .2 [040] 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 .0.0.0. .L.A.N. [050] 00 4D 00 61 00 6E 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 .M.a.n.a .g.e.r.. [060] 00 42 00 45 00 5A 00 52 00 48 00 4C 00 41 00 42 .B.E.Z.R .H.L.A.B [070] 00 00 00 ... spnego_parse_auth_response failed at 9 Failed to parse auth response SPNEGO login failed: Unexpected information received lang_tdb_init: /usr/lib/samba/en_US.UTF-8.msg: No such file or directory session setup failed: SUCCESS - 0 -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jra@samba.org] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:03 PM To: Kalnichevski, Oleg Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers? On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:> > Good ${time of the day} > > I have just been wondering if anyone would know if Samba is compatible with the CIFS implementation of the Network Appliance DataONTAP filers? > > http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/ontap.html > > I have so far unable to connect to any shared folder on the NetApp filer that require authentication. An attempt to access or list shared resources on the NetApp filer fails with the following error message. > > session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE > > I am running Fedora Core 2 > * kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 > * samba client 3.0.3-5 > > NetApp F85 filer running NetApp Release 6.3.2 > > Did anyone have better luck getting Samba to work with NetApp filers?Yes, can you send a debug level 10 trace please ? We're here in the CIFS interop lab along with NetApp, so now is a good time to do this. Jeremy. *************************************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system. ***************************************************************************************************
Kalnichevski, Oleg
2004-Aug-13 18:45 UTC
[Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers?
Jeremy, Would it be a big deal for you to find out the exact release version of the NetApp software you could successfully run smbclient against? Oleg -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jra@samba.org] Sent: Fri 8/13/2004 19:58 To: Kalnichevski, Oleg Cc: Jeremy Allison; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Compatibility with NetApp DataONTAP filers? On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:> > Jeremy > I really appreciate your response. Please find the debug trace below. > > Just a few notes: I upgraded the filer's operating system from release 6.3.2 to 6.4.4R1 prior to running the test. It did not make much of a difference but I did get a different error message this time around. I am going to upgrade to the NetApp's latest and greatest stable release (6.5.1R1) and post you on the resultsI did test here in the lab yesterday with the version NetApp had brought - I'm assuming it was the latest stable version - and had no problems connecting with smbclient. It looks like it might be a bug in their older implementations. Jeremy. *************************************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system. ***************************************************************************************************