I've looked through the archives and the only information I can find regarding Windows XP SP2 is RC2. Has anyone out there had ANY experience with XP SP2 Official and a Samba 3 domain? -- Bert Rapp North Trail RV Center p 239.693.8200 f 239.693.8115
> I've looked through the archives and the only information I can > find regarding > Windows XP SP2 is RC2. Has anyone out there had ANY experience > with XP SP2 > Official and a Samba 3 domain?Like what? I installed the final release version last night and have had no problems John
Bert Rapp wrote:> I've looked through the archives and the only information I can find regarding > Windows XP SP2 is RC2. Has anyone out there had ANY experience with XP SP2 > Official and a Samba 3 domain?Yes! All my workstations are WinXP SP2, and I'm runnig samba 3.0.5 as PDC and everything is fine. I had just disabled the NT sign on seal at the registry on each XP workstation. With the following reg script: http://www.em.pucrs.br/~filipi/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg Regards, -- Filipi Vianna Laborat?rio de Mec?nica Computacional (DEMM) Faculdade de Engenharia - PUC-RS telefone: (51) 3320-3500 ramal: 4053
> I had just disabled the NT sign on seal at the registry on each XP > workstation. With the following reg script: > http://www.em.pucrs.br/~filipi/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg >This should not have been necessary with samba 3. -- Paul Gienger Office: 701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.com mailto: pgienger@ae-solutions.com
Paul Gienger wrote:> >> I had just disabled the NT sign on seal at the registry on each XP >> workstation. With the following reg script: >> http://www.em.pucrs.br/~filipi/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg >> > This should not have been necessary with samba 3. >I was thinking the same... But I had tried without it and I could not add the machine to the domain. -- Filipi Vianna Laborat?rio de Mec?nica Computacional (DEMM) Faculdade de Engenharia - PUC-RS telefone: (51) 3320-3500 ramal: 4053
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bert Rapp wrote: | I've looked through the archives and the only information | I can find regarding Windows XP SP2 is RC2. Has anyone | out there had ANY experience with XP SP2 Official and a Samba | 3 domain? Looks like MS did not fix the print change notify bug. I would not recommend installing it if you Samba is is serving printers or unless you are running 3.0.6rc2. 3.0.6 final will be out later this week. cheers, jerry - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song"--Switchfoot (2003) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBGWhUIR7qMdg1EfYRAnJQAJ4qibLcmNnYs+oF8zxyNl/dBjmjdACaA+16 LsvyDzVj4oxvNRlqvc0Pzo0=6xvt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hallo Jerry,> | I've looked through the archives and the only information > | I can find regarding Windows XP SP2 is RC2. Has anyone > | out there had ANY experience with XP SP2 Official and a Samba > | 3 domain? > > Looks like MS did not fix the print change notify bug. > > I would not recommend installing it if you Samba is is serving > printers or unless you are running 3.0.6rc2. 3.0.6 final will > be out later this week.could you please advise, how to prevent Samba 2.2.10 from crashing with XP SP2? I know, that Samba 2.2.x is outdated but the 2.2 versions are much more stable than 3.x. Its a pitty - I don't have enough time to install a new 3.x version every week or month, because another memory leak or showstopping bug is fixed :( I think, there exists much more installations on production systems with the stable 2.2.x Samba outthere than with 3.x. If you could post the relevant code, I could patch 2.2.10 myself. Kindly regards der tom ____________________________________________________ Aufnehmen, abschicken, nah sein - So einfach ist WEB.DE Video-Mail: http://freemail.web.de/?mc=021200
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> | | Looks like MS did not fix the print change notify bug.
is this the bug, which you mean (think not, because this is the client
part, not the server)?:
test2 # tail -f /var/log/log.smbd
[2004/08/10 23:05:30, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(381)
make_connection: root logged in as admin user (root privileges)
[2004/08/10 23:10:53, 0] smbd/server.c:main(791)
smbd version 2.2.10 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2002
[2004/08/12 21:45:49, 0] smbd/server.c:main(791)
smbd version 2.2.10 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2002
[2004/08/12 21:49:43, 0]
rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_clie
nt(91)
connect_to_client: unable to connect to SMB server on machine R40.
Error was :
SUCCESS - 0.
> Here's a patch. Please test.
>
>
>
>
> cheers, jerry
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBGqB+IR7qMdg1EfYRAm52AJ41/Dq4SpBfH8i9RK0MrWRKxDENAQCeLDdw
> g5UutSpgD9NhV+683ow0Qv0 > =ux2J
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c
> ================================================================== >
--- source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c (revision 1741)
> +++ source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c (working copy)
> @@ -2830,6 +2830,12 @@
> info->data=NULL;
> info->count=0;
>
> + /* a bug in xp sp2 rc2 causes it to send a fnpcn request without
> + sending a ffpcn() request first */
> +
> + if ( !option )
> + return WERR_BADFID;
> +
> for (i=0; i<option->count; i++) {
> option_type=&(option->ctr.type[i]);
>
> @@ -2891,6 +2897,12 @@
> info->data=NULL;
> info->count=0;
>
> + /* a bug in xp sp2 rc2 causes it to send a fnpcn request without
> + sending a ffpcn() request first */
> +
> + if ( !option )
> + return WERR_BADFID;
> +
> get_printer_snum(p, hnd, &snum);
>
> for (i=0; i<option->count; i++) {
>
I will retest with the patch tonight. Thanks a lot :)
--
der tom
[fli4l-/eis-team]