Hello again, I'm not attempting an install of Samba 3.0.4 from source. I want to specifically compile in ads and winbindd support. So, I already compiled and installed OpenLDAP 2.2.13. Now the configure script is hung on krb5 dependancy: checking for krb5.h... no configure: error: Active Directory cannot be supported without krb5.h So I downloaded and attempted compile of krb5 1.3.4, but I got this error: /root/stuff/krb5-1.3.4/src/appl/telnet/telnet/telnet.c:783: undefined reference to `tgetent' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Upon searching kerberos list archives, there was a complaint about this error and having to reinstall ncurses to satisfy this reference. http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-May/005452.html <http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-May/005452.html> However, when I compile ncurses 5.3, I get an error about g++ not being installed. This seems like an endless dependancy. Any tips on making samba configure script happy? --- <<...OLE_Obj...>> Shawn Poulson SAP America, IT/PSS (610) 661-5011 shawn.poulson@sap.com
Typo... "I'm now attempting..." doh -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+shawn.poulson=sap.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+shawn.poulson=sap.com@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Poulson, Shawn Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 11:47 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Compiling Samba 3.0.4, err w/ krb5 Hello again, I'm not attempting an install of Samba 3.0.4 from source. I want to specifically compile in ads and winbindd support. So, I already compiled and installed OpenLDAP 2.2.13. Now the configure script is hung on krb5 dependancy: checking for krb5.h... no configure: error: Active Directory cannot be supported without krb5.h So I downloaded and attempted compile of krb5 1.3.4, but I got this error: /root/stuff/krb5-1.3.4/src/appl/telnet/telnet/telnet.c:783: undefined reference to `tgetent' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Upon searching kerberos list archives, there was a complaint about this error and having to reinstall ncurses to satisfy this reference. http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-May/005452.html <http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-May/005452.html> However, when I compile ncurses 5.3, I get an error about g++ not being installed. This seems like an endless dependancy. Any tips on making samba configure script happy? --- <<...OLE_Obj...>> Shawn Poulson SAP America, IT/PSS (610) 661-5011 shawn.poulson@sap.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
SuSE United Linux 1.0 (aka SuSE 8.1 Enterprise) -----Original Message----- From: Tom Skeren [mailto:tms3@fskklaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:09 PM To: Poulson, Shawn Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Compiling Samba 3.0.4, err w/ krb5 What O.S.? Poulson, Shawn wrote:>Typo... "I'm now attempting..." doh > >-----Original Message----- >From: samba-bounces+shawn.poulson=sap.com@lists.samba.org >[mailto:samba-bounces+shawn.poulson=sap.com@lists.samba.org] On Behalf >Of Poulson, Shawn >Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 11:47 AM >To: samba@lists.samba.org >Subject: [Samba] Compiling Samba 3.0.4, err w/ krb5 > >Hello again, > >I'm not attempting an install of Samba 3.0.4 from source. I want to specifically compile in ads and winbindd support. So, I already compiled and installed OpenLDAP 2.2.13. > >Now the configure script is hung on krb5 dependancy: >checking for krb5.h... no >configure: error: Active Directory cannot be supported without krb5.h > >So I downloaded and attempted compile of krb5 1.3.4, but I got this error: >/root/stuff/krb5-1.3.4/src/appl/telnet/telnet/telnet.c:783: undefined reference to `tgetent' >collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > >Upon searching kerberos list archives, there was a complaint about this error and having to reinstall ncurses to satisfy this reference. http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-May/005452.html <http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-May/005452.html> However, when I compile ncurses 5.3, I get an error about g++ not being installed. > >This seems like an endless dependancy. Any tips on making samba configure script happy? > >--- > <<...OLE_Obj...>> >Shawn Poulson >SAP America, IT/PSS >(610) 661-5011 >shawn.poulson@sap.com > > > >
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 11:46, Poulson, Shawn wrote:> Hello again, > > I'm not attempting an install of Samba 3.0.4 from source. I want to > specifically compile in ads and winbindd support. So, I already > compiled and installed OpenLDAP 2.2.13.If you are not attempting to install samba from source, how are you going to get ads and winbindd support? What does OpenLDAP have to do with doing up samba for ads and winbind?> Now the configure script is hung on krb5 dependancy: > checking for krb5.h... no > configure: error: Active Directory cannot be supported without krb5.hThat is a sticker. you need to have version of krb5 installed, either MIT or HEIMDAL.> So I downloaded and attempted compile of krb5 1.3.4, but I got this > error: > /root/stuff/krb5-1.3.4/src/appl/telnet/telnet/telnet.c:783: undefined > reference to `tgetent' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > Upon searching kerberos list archives, there was a complaint about > this error and having to reinstall ncurses to satisfy this reference.Good on the D/L of MIT KRB5 1.3.4. Shucks, ncurses. well, you downloaded that.> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-May/005452.html > <http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-May/005452.html> > However, when I compile ncurses 5.3, I get an error about g++ not > being installed.Well, that is a biggy. you might have gcc installed (the C compiler) but not have the C++ compiler g++ installed. It happens to all of us.> This seems like an endless dependancy. Any tips on making samba > configure script happy?Yes, how long have been an admin of a *NIX machine? I can say I have had to deal with things like this for eons. If you do it often enough, you get good at it. I used to update whole Linux machine with touch RPM or any other package manager. Mainly they screwed up everything I needed left as is (config wise). So, I used Slackware. Now I use Debian Sid. Now, remember I said alot. But gave no real answer. You asked alot but gave us no clues how to help you. What *NIX are you using. Is it a Linux or *BSD? If it is Linux which distro is it? When you can tell us the answers, we can help. -- greg, greg@gregfolkert.net The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040721/131ca1f0/attachment.bin
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 07:46, Poulson, Shawn wrote:> I don't care for being patronized. I had a question, and I get this > condescending reply. Thanks, but no thanks.I wasn't patronizing you. It was not condescending. It was a polite reminder to ask good questions. You think it is a simple question you asked, it is not. I could have given you the standard tirade that people asking your kind of bad questions get on the mailing lists I am on that are technical in nature, but not Windows in nature. You see, many people that have been long using Unix, Linux or *BSD, understand how to ask good questions, yet it seems from my perspective and many others that people coming or 95% of the time being in a "Windows"[tm] world, ask questions that are not quite as complete. Therefore when dealing with a heavy technical group such as the samba mailing list, where traceback stacks are commonly referred to or the error logs say "Read the Bugs Appendix" others typically known what the heck they are talking about. Please, think about including details of the system(s) you are dealing with. Then and only then can someone with the knowledge you are *ASKING FOR* can make a proper response to your problem. Being snide and asking stupid questions are not garnering you any goodwill. Thank you my dear for really hitting this idea home for me, without your ability to dig deeper, the message would not have come across as well. Now, that we are past the pleasantries, What kind of a system are you running, is it Linux, *BSD or Commercial Unix? If so, What version and possibly which Distro are you using? Have you searched for a prebuilt Binary that may fit your needs? Please cut the pleasantries and just answer the questions. This is NOT SAP you are dealing with here, Deary. -- greg, greg@gregfolkert.net The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040722/fb6e7253/attachment.bin
I'd love to see the configure line for Hemdial. Thanks!
_____
From: Tom Skeren [mailto:tms3@fskklaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:49 AM
To: greg@gregfolkert.net
Cc: Poulson, Shawn; SambaUser List
Subject: Re: [Samba] Compiling Samba 3.0.4, err w/ krb5
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 07:46, Poulson, Shawn wrote:
I don't care for being patronized. I had a question, and I get this
condescending reply. Thanks, but no thanks.
I wasn't patronizing you. It was not condescending. It was a polite
reminder to ask good questions. You think it is a simple question you
asked, it is not.
I could have given you the standard tirade that people asking your kind
of bad questions get on the mailing lists I am on that are technical in
nature, but not Windows in nature.
You see, many people that have been long using Unix, Linux or *BSD,
understand how to ask good questions, yet it seems from my perspective
and many others that people coming or 95% of the time being in a
"Windows"[tm] world, ask questions that are not quite as complete.
Therefore when dealing with a heavy technical group such as the samba
mailing list, where traceback stacks are commonly referred to or the
error logs say "Read the Bugs Appendix" others typically known what
the
heck they are talking about.
Please, think about including details of the system(s) you are dealing
with. Then and only then can someone with the knowledge you are *ASKING
FOR* can make a proper response to your problem. Being snide and asking
stupid questions are not garnering you any goodwill.
Thank you my dear for really hitting this idea home for me, without your
ability to dig deeper, the message would not have come across as well.
Now, that we are past the pleasantries, What kind of a system are you
running, is it Linux, *BSD or Commercial Unix? If so, What version and
possibly which Distro are you using? Have you searched for a prebuilt
Binary that may fit your needs?
I asked for OS info yesterday too. Had a similar problem with Hemdial on
FreeBSD. Got a mile long configure line in a text file that works like a charm
on clean install....That means no attempt to install MIT krb5 ;-). Willing to
send it if it's a FreeB box.
Please cut the pleasantries and just answer the questions. This is NOT
SAP you are dealing with here, Deary.