Hello, 1: I've read, that primary-group of a user must be a windows-group? Is that true? 2. Why is there no group named 'Power Users' in Samba? (Actually there is only 'Domain Users' with insufficiant permissions on a win-box) matze
Matthias Spork wrote:> 2. > Why is there no group named 'Power Users' in Samba? (Actually there is > only 'Domain Users' with insufficiant permissions on a win-box)The groups that samba enumerates correlate to the user groups that are in a Windows Domain. There is no Domain\Power Users group, that group only exists on each individual machine. -- Paul Gienger Office: 701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254 Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.com mailto:pgienger@ae-solutions.com
"Matthias Spork" <hallo@matthiasspork.de> wrote in message news:4076E81B.9010005@matthiasspork.de...> 1: > I've read, that primary-group of a user must be a windows-group? > Is that true?Where did you read that? Do you mean the primary unix group of a user must be a group that is mapped to a windows group? Every once in a while my samba server logs complain that a user's primary group is not a windows group, but there is no indication of what it is or how to change it. On redhat machines, by default each user's primary unix group is a group with the same name as the user. Should these all be changed to something else?