search for: primary

Now, TOSHARG-VFS.xml translate to Japanese finished(3.4.0 base). And some bug found. <indexterm><primary>UID</primary></indexterm> <indexterm><primary>GID</primary></indexterm> <indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm> <indexterm><primary>idmap uid</primary></indexterm> <indexterm><primary>idmap gid&...

Hi guys - I'd really like to straighten the fiollowing errors out. Any ideas? Feb 2 09:01:58 primary smbd[8041]: [2006/02/02 09:01:58, 0] smbd/connection.c:register_message_flags(220) Feb 2 09:01:58 primary smbd[8041]: register_message_flags: tdb_fetch failed Feb 2 09:02:41 primary smbd[8467]: [2006/02/02 09:02:41, 0] smbd/connection.c:register_message_flags(220) Feb 2 09:02:41 primary smbd[8...

...account that has <constant>root</constant> privileges on the Samba server) must be entered here; the operation will fail if an ordinary user account is given. ---> Can user who have SeMachineAccountPrivilege rights join machine ? <para> <indexterm><primary>ADS</primary></indexterm> <indexterm><primary>SRV records</primary></indexterm> <indexterm><primary>DNS zon</primary></indexterm> ---zone? <indexterm><primary>KDC</primary></indexterm> &l...

...Michael ;zapata.conf switchtype=national context=incoming_eli_pri_1 signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channel => 1-11 bchan=1-11 dchan=24 ;zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-11 dchan=24 Jun 29 07:09:07 NOTICE[3094]: chan_zap.c:7394 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 29 07:09:07 NOTICE[3094]: chan_zap.c:7394 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 29 07:09:07 NOTICE[3094]: chan_zap.c:7394 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 29 07:09:07 NOTICE[3094]: chan_...

...ngoma A101D-X card talking to a Sasktel PRI (Megalink) circuit and having some trouble getting it to handshake. Thanks for any help or suggestions to diagnose this problem. The problem is that Asterisk has trouble bringing up the link. I see the following lines every couple of minutes: == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up h87*CLI> pri show spans PRI span 1/0: Provisioned, Up, Ac...

Hi, if you use the UNIX attributes the primary group is ignored if you use winbind and the primary group of the AD attributes is used. So every user has the "Domain Users" group as primary group. I also read that you are not supposed to change the AD primary group to another than "Domain Users". Is there a way to set the...

...nterrupt problem? If so, how can I check? The specs of the machine are, Dual Xeon 2.80Ghz (both single core but w/HT) 4GB memory. Running asterisk 1.4.26.3 (32-bit) with libpri-1.4.7 and zaptel-1.4.12.9 Thanks. -- James Please CC me on responses. [Mar 22 09:45:00] VERBOSE[8887] logger.c: == Primary D-Channel on span 2 down [Mar 22 09:45:00] WARNING[8887] chan_dahdi.c: No D-channels available! Using Primary channel 48 as D-channel anyway! [Mar 22 09:45:00] VERBOSE[8887] logger.c: == Primary D-Channel on span 2 up [Mar 22 09:59:23] VERBOSE[8886] logger.c: == Primary D-Channel on span 1 dow...

...ount: g4400$ Creating account: INFI2292-80$ Creating account: PAP-E06EFL2FLCA$ Creating account: G830-78$ Creating account: COL190GPCTAB-62$ Creating account: PERIA30-63$ Creating account: ROM010IA30-71$ Creating account: DEK480IA30-73$ Group members of Domain Admins: charliebrown,faxserver,joeblow(primary),vbe(primary),snoopy(primary),epo,xerox, Group members of Domain Users: PRIMARY$(primary),CONSDEV $(primary),marshah(primary),marshab(primary),johnp(primary) . . . <snip> rajg(primary),FIEGATEWAY450-5$(primary),MAC120I2652-8 $(primary),FISGE2000D-2$(primary),DISGE2000D-1$(primary),ADA440GPCTA...

There is a line in my message that was incorrect. It should state the following: The users with "(primary)" attached to their name are being deleted. As you can see, the Domain Admins group no longer includes joeblow, snoopy or vbe. My Enviornment: NT 4.0 PDC Debian (Sarge) Samba 3.0.7-2 Openldap 2.1.30-3 Windows 98,2000 and XP clients ----- Forwarded by Alex Brown/Compsrv/pap on 11/23/2004 03...

Commit "f4bd542bca drm/fb-helper: Scale back depth to supported maximum" uncovered a bug in the cirrus driver. It must create its own primary plane, using the correct format list, depending on the bpp module parameter, so it is consistent with mode_config->preferred_depth. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_mode.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 66 i...

...l_cc_c_9.1.042/bin/icc -c99 -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c rsync.c -o rsync.o icc: Command line remark: option '-W' not supported proto.h(224): remark #310: old-style parameter list (anachronism) void setup_iconv(); ^ rsync.c(33): remark #1419: external declaration in primary source file extern int verbose; ^ rsync.c(34): remark #1419: external declaration in primary source file extern int dry_run; ^ rsync.c(35): remark #1419: external declaration in primary source file extern int preserve_perms; ^ rsync.c(36): remark #141...

Solaris 8, Samba 3.0.1, Winbind with LDAP backend and security = ads. This may or may not be a problem, depending on what is "expected behaviour". We came across a user that was defined both locally and in AD. Their local primary group, call it "localgrp", was not the same as their global primary group, call it "globalgrp". One important note is that by using an LDAP browser, we can see that the user is not explicitly a Member Of globalgrp (ie: there is no "member" entry for the user in globalg...

...ile * base: it.centos.contactlab.it * centosplus: mirror.crazynetwork.it * extras: mirror.crazynetwork.it * rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de * updates: mirror.crazynetwork.it http://it.centos.contactlab.it/6.2/os/i386/repodata/48da39a2e80a927a88946a36c63414964312e64f85c7b32c3ce553d2969f46d6-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404" Trying other mirror. http://mirror.crazynetwork.it/centos/6.2/os/i386/repodata/48da39a2e80a927a88946a36c63414964312e64f85c7b32c3ce553d2969f46d6-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The reque...

Hi, I am getting this message on the * console on my first pri span. Pri show span show it is down, and I can't make any calls from the span. Apr 27 07:40:23 NOTICE[23988]: chan_zap.c:8202 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Apr 27 07:40:23 NOTICE[23988]: chan_zap.c:8202 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Apr 27 07:40:23 NOTICE[23988]: chan_zap.c:8202 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Apr 27 07:40:24 NOTICE[23988]: chan...

...hout having changed anything on the asterisk server for at least 2 months, i noticed "clicking sounds" at external calls over the PRI. Asterisk constantly throws the following messages: ... [May 31 14:03:37] NOTICE[4163]: chan_dahdi.c:9078 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 [May 31 14:03:37] NOTICE[4163]: chan_dahdi.c:9078 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 [May 31 14:03:37] NOTICE[4163]: chan_dahdi.c:9078 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 [May 31 14:03:37] NOTICE[...

...; > > On 2018?06?12? 19:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> >>> On 2018?06?05? 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> I don't think this is sufficient. >>>> >>>> If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest >>>> without >>>> support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get >>>> confused. >>>> >>>> I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the >>...

...; > > On 2018?06?12? 19:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> >>> On 2018?06?05? 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> I don't think this is sufficient. >>>> >>>> If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest >>>> without >>>> support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get >>>> confused. >>>> >>>> I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the >>...

I have upgraded Samba in my environment from 4.5.10 to 4.6.3 and experienced issue with primary group for domain guest user: With Samba 4.5.10 primary group for DEV2+guest was "DEV2+domain guests": root at root:~# id DEV2+guest uid=66037(DEV2+guest) gid=66050(DEV2+domain guests) groups=66050(DEV2+domain guests) With Samba 4.6.3 primary group for DEV2+guest is "DEV2+domain u...

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?06?05? 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I don't think this is sufficient. > > > > If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without > > support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get > > confused. > > > > I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the > > backup feature bit. > > I think we w...

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?06?05? 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I don't think this is sufficient. > > > > If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without > > support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get > > confused. > > > > I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the > > backup feature bit. > > I think we w...