samba - Mar 2004 - * script parameter and BDC

When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any *script
paramater in smb.conf?


--beast

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 23:36, Beast wrote:
> When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any
*script paramater in smb.conf?
If you can keep the scripts identical between PDC and BDC, this will
avoid supprises.

BDCs will not normally be asked to make changes, but if asked, Samba
BDCs will happily try.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet@pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet@samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet@hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040302/61361e4e/attachment.bin

* Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> nulis:
> On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 23:36, Beast wrote:
> > When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any
*script paramater in smb.conf?
> 
> If you can keep the scripts identical between PDC and BDC, this will
> avoid supprises.
> 
> BDCs will not normally be asked to make changes, but if asked, Samba
> BDCs will happily try.
> 
Is there any (not normal) cases where BDC is asked to make any changes?

Thanks.


--beast