When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any *script paramater in smb.conf? --beast
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 23:36, Beast wrote:> When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any *script paramater in smb.conf?If you can keep the scripts identical between PDC and BDC, this will avoid supprises. BDCs will not normally be asked to make changes, but if asked, Samba BDCs will happily try. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet@samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet@hawkerc.net samba.org build.samba.org hawkerc.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040302/61361e4e/attachment.bin
* Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> nulis:> On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 23:36, Beast wrote: > > When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any *script paramater in smb.conf? > > If you can keep the scripts identical between PDC and BDC, this will > avoid supprises. > > BDCs will not normally be asked to make changes, but if asked, Samba > BDCs will happily try. >Is there any (not normal) cases where BDC is asked to make any changes? Thanks. --beast
Possibly Parallel Threads
- smbpasswd trying to add instead of replace attribut
- Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: using a master ldap server and a slave ldap server for one samba
- PDC/BDC Domain Logins Samba 2.2.7
- Unable to change Windows password on Samba BDC
- secrets_fetch_trusted_domain_password