samba - Jan 2004 - Samba 3 and Windows 2000 (SP4) Terminal Server

Hello,

at this time we're using s. 2.2.8a (running on SuSE-Linux StandardServer 8 -
Kernel 2.4.21) as fileserver for our terminal server environment. We ran
into the 128 connections per client limitation and had to modify the
MAX_CONNECTIONS-parameter in smbd/conn.c. Now we're planning the migration
from s.
2.2.8a to s. 3.0.1. Is the modification in smbd/conn.c still necessary, when
using
s. 3.0.1 in a Windows 2000 (SP4) terminal server environment?

Thanks Thorsten.

-- 
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse f?r Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung f?r MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net

On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:40:00AM +0100, Thorsten Leiser
wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> at this time we're using s. 2.2.8a (running on SuSE-Linux
StandardServer 8 -
> Kernel 2.4.21) as fileserver for our terminal server environment. We ran
> into the 128 connections per client limitation and had to modify the
> MAX_CONNECTIONS-parameter in smbd/conn.c. Now we're planning the
migration from s.
> 2.2.8a to s. 3.0.1. Is the modification in smbd/conn.c still necessary,
when using
> s. 3.0.1 in a Windows 2000 (SP4) terminal server environment?
This issue has been fixed, but I'm not sure if it made 3.0.1 (I can't
see it in the changelog).

Andrew Bartlett

> > limitation and had to modify the MAX_CONNECTIONS-parameter in 
> > smbd/conn.c. Now we're planning the migration from s. 2.2.8a to s.
> > 3.0.1. Is the modification in smbd/conn.c still necessary, 
> when using 
> > s. 3.0.1 in a Windows 2000 (SP4) terminal server environment?
> 
> This issue has been fixed, but I'm not sure if it made 3.0.1 
> (I can't see it in the changelog).
> Andrew Bartlett
You can find a patch at: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=716

Jeremy Allison claims the patch is applied, but the source code in
smbd/conn.c for samba.latest (3.0.1) has not been changed.

Regards
Per Kjetil Grotnes