Hello, I am currently using Samba 2.2.3a on a Sequent box running DYNIX/ptx v4.0. We are serving up approximatly 4.5 terrabytes of data from a Hitachi Data Systems storage array connected to our server by fiber channel. Many of our users are on Citrix which connects to our SAMBA server via a Gigabit Ethernet connection. There are still others that are connecting directly from their PCs which are connected to 10/100 ethernet which then goes to a FDDI backbone which the Samba server is on directly. In the last six months, we've a significant upgrade in which we have gone from about 20% of our users being Win2k and 80% on Win9x to 90% Win2k and 10% Win9x. In the last week we have noticed some serious performance degredations. We found ourselves in a position at one point where the box was made unusable because we reached the maximum number of UDP Protocol Control Blocks that the OS was configured to handle. We have since quadrupled the number and have not had the server itself become unusable but we are still haveing slow downs reported by users. We also turned off oplocks which seems to have helped the sitution this morning but we are back where we started this afternoon. I am looking for some tuning suggestions that might be able to help this. I am currently looking at Appendix B from using Samba for information on Performance Tuning. I understand that this book was written for the 2.0 series of Samba but I'm assuming that it is still pertenant. Are there any additional suggestions? Additionally, from looking in netstat, we have noticed that there are a large number of TCP sockets in a "CLOSE_WAIT" state. There are also a large number of UDP sockets open but they are only listening on the loopback interface. Is this normal? Thank you all very much for your help and I would appreciate any help or comments. Chris Donovan Lanier Worldwide # Samba config file created using SWAT # Names and IPs changed :) # Global parameters [global] workgroup = LANIER netbios name = SAMBA server string = SAMBA interfaces = 192.168.127.52/24 127.0.0.1/0 192.168.120.34/24 192.168.115.11/24 # netbios aliases = SAMBA7 bind interfaces only = No security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = NT1 NT2 password level = 9 use mmap = no log file = /d/samba/logs/log.%m include = /d/samba/cfg/pernode/smb.conf.%m name resolve order = wins host bcast lmhosts # shared mem size = 4194304 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=24576 SO_RCVBUF=24576 max xmit = 65535 oplocks = no load printers = no domain master = no local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 10 dns proxy = No wins server = 192.168.129.38 message command = /usr/bin/mailx -s 'message from %f on %m' nt ss < %s ; rm %s admin users = u1, u2, mcaffee read only = No create mask = 0770 force create mode = 070 security mask = 0707 directory mask = 02770 force directory mode = 02770 directory security mask = 0707 #hosts allow = ALL map hidden = Yes map archive = No postexec = /bin/true root preexec = /bin/true root postexec = /bin/true dos filetimes = Yes follow symlinks = Yes wide links = Yes exec = touch %H/.lastlogin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Donovan, Chris wrote:> Additionally, from looking in netstat, we have noticed that there are a > large number of TCP sockets in a "CLOSE_WAIT" state. There are also a > large number of UDP sockets open but they are only listening on the > loopback interface. Is this normal?The UDP sockets are normal. smbd uses those for oplock breaks.> use mmap = noIs mmap broken on DYNIX? cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE+KEReIR7qMdg1EfYRAhlmAJ4735V0PfzG2WBBUMw+raM0t9baQgCfU96+ v/1EA9LaMKUbJ7sJcP3yD9s=V4YT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Possibly Parallel Threads
- No subject
- RE: How do I get the @#$$% job name to show instead of smbprn.yad a.yada?
- How do I get the @#$$% job name to show instead of smbprn.yada.ya da?
- 2.0.7: inherit permissions = yes breaks setting read-only on files
- How do I get the @#$$% job name to show instead of smbprn.xxxxxx. xxxxxx?