Background: I have a Windows 2000 Data Center Server (4 way 4GB Mem) running as a CIFS client to a Sun E5500 (the samba server with similar memory CPU etc). The Sun E5500 is running LSCI's "ASM" software which manages a StorageTek powderhorn tape library. There is ample 622 ATM bandwidth between the two servers for samba traffic. The ASM software is an HSM product it archives our images (65K to 50 MB files) to tape - then ASM leaves a stub file in the directory for retrieval. This directory is shared out via Samba. To retrieve the file from tape all the user or client application has to do is open (read) the file and wait. ASM then restores the original file overtop the stub file. There can be up to a 2 minute delay between beginning to read the file and actually getting data passed back Our client application on the Windows 2000 is written to do just that, and has been working fine using NFS on an NT server. Running the same NFS configuration on the new version of WIndows blue screens Microsoft's Data Center. Question: Is anyone using samba with LSCI's HSM application in this way? The Samba Setup: workgroup, protocol=NT1, security=share, guest=root, hosts allow=ip address of client. Everything seems to work properly until I start ramping up the image transfers. The samba log files are void of any errors. The three visible problems I am having: 1. File browser response time on the Windows is intermittent. Sometimes when we open up the "My Computer" icon the samba mounts take up to 1 minute to show up. I went though the Samba "Troubleshooting Techniques" - everything checked out. Pings (even large packets) are < 10ms. 2. The client application occasionally says that there is not enough free disk space to archive a new file, although there is.. I think this could be a side effect of item #1. In the old NFS implementation we had to set the "File Cache Timeout", "Attribute Cache Timeout" and "RPC Timeout" to large numbers. Anything like this in Samba? 3. Also the client application occasionally reports that it cannot open an image file. Only about 2% are failing, if you try the same file a second time it works fine - the data's been restored and already sitting on disk. Could Samba be having an issue with files that take longer than the average time to retrieve? Thank You in advance for any help you can offer. Jess Carruthers Project Manager Information Services William Beaumont Hospital Phone 248-597-2655 Fax 248-597-2490