thr3ads.net - samba - [Samba] Help - Samba 2.2.3a + Solaris 8 7/01

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Russell Aspinwall

2002-Mar-06 04:31 UTC

[Samba] Help - Samba 2.2.3a + Solaris 8 7/01 - 64 bit binaries

Hi,

I have compiled Samba 2.2.3a on Solaris 8 7/01 to produce 64 bit
binaries and to use the 64 bit i/o functions.
The compiled code has been installed on two identical Sun Servers, the
key differences between the configurations is that one has the maximum
number of file descriptors set to 65000 (Solaris configured for 65356)
and has op locks disabled because it is being used with Clear Case.

Server One was added the NT Domain and is working normally.
Server Two was added to the NT Domain (its initial max. file descriptors
= 62000) and appeared to work normally. After upgrading to 65000 file
descriptions and restarting samba, the server became accessible
intermittently. When trying to access from a Windows NT 4.0 Workstation
(SrvPk 6) via browsing the Network Neighbour it generated a "<server>
not accessible. RPC call failed to execute".

The smbd and nmbd logs are included below

$ more log.nmbd 
[2002/03/05 14:36:34, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:(783)
  Netbios nameserver version 2.2.3a started.
  Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002
[2002/03/05 14:36:38, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:(237)
  find_response_record: response packet id 20752 received with no
matching record.
[2002/03/05 14:36:38, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:(237)
  find_response_record: response packet id 20753 received with no
matching record.
[2002/03/05 14:58:58, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:(63)
  Got SIGTERM: going down...
$ more log.smbd
[2002/03/05 14:36:34, 0] smbd/server.c:(698)
  smbd version 2.2.3a started.
  Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2002
$ 

$ more log.jeeves
[2002/03/05 13:59:17, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 49
[2002/03/05 13:59:17, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 4a
[2002/03/05 13:59:17, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 4b
[2002/03/05 13:59:17, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 4c
[2002/03/05 13:59:17, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 4d
[2002/03/05 13:59:17, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 4e
[2002/03/05 13:59:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 4f
[2002/03/05 13:59:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 50
[2002/03/05 13:59:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 51
[2002/03/05 13:59:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 52
[2002/03/05 13:59:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 53
[2002/03/05 13:59:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 54
[2002/03/05 13:59:42, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 55
[2002/03/05 13:59:42, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 56
[2002/03/05 13:59:42, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 57
[2002/03/05 13:59:42, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 58
[2002/03/05 13:59:42, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 59
[2002/03/05 13:59:42, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 5a
[2002/03/05 14:01:12, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 5b
[2002/03/05 14:01:12, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 5c
[2002/03/05 14:01:12, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 5d
[2002/03/05 14:01:12, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 5e
[2002/03/05 14:01:12, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 5f
[2002/03/05 14:01:12, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 60
[2002/03/05 14:02:09, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 61
[2002/03/05 14:02:09, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 62
[2002/03/05 14:02:09, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 63
[2002/03/05 14:02:09, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 64
[2002/03/05 14:02:09, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 65
[2002/03/05 14:02:09, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 66
[2002/03/05 14:04:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 67
[2002/03/05 14:04:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 68
[2002/03/05 14:04:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 69
[2002/03/05 14:04:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 6a
[2002/03/05 14:04:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 6b
[2002/03/05 14:04:22, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 6c
[2002/03/05 14:04:25, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 6d
[2002/03/05 14:04:25, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 6e
[2002/03/05 14:04:25, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 6f
[2002/03/05 14:04:25, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 70
[2002/03/05 14:04:25, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 71
[2002/03/05 14:04:25, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 72
[2002/03/05 14:04:29, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 73
[2002/03/05 14:04:29, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 74
[2002/03/05 14:04:29, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 75
[2002/03/05 14:04:29, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 76
[2002/03/05 14:04:29, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 77
[2002/03/05 14:04:29, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 78
[2002/03/05 14:06:57, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 79
[2002/03/05 14:06:57, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 7a
[2002/03/05 14:06:57, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 7b
[2002/03/05 14:15:31, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3a6
[2002/03/05 14:15:31, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3a7
[2002/03/05 14:15:31, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3a8
[2002/03/05 14:15:31, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3a9
[2002/03/05 14:15:31, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3aa
[2002/03/05 14:15:31, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3ab
[2002/03/05 14:15:34, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3ac
[2002/03/05 14:15:34, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3ad
[2002/03/05 14:15:34, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3ae
[2002/03/05 14:15:34, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3af
[2002/03/05 14:15:34, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b0
[2002/03/05 14:15:34, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b1
[2002/03/05 14:15:45, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b2
[2002/03/05 14:15:45, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b3
[2002/03/05 14:15:45, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b4
[2002/03/05 14:15:45, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b5
[2002/03/05 14:15:45, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b6
[2002/03/05 14:15:45, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b7
[2002/03/05 14:17:05, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3ae
[2002/03/05 14:17:05, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3af
[2002/03/05 14:17:05, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b0
[2002/03/05 14:17:05, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b1
[2002/03/05 14:17:05, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b2
[2002/03/05 14:17:05, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 3b3
[2002/03/05 14:20:06, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 117
[2002/03/05 14:20:06, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 118
[2002/03/05 14:20:06, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 119
[2002/03/05 14:20:06, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11a
[2002/03/05 14:20:06, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11b
[2002/03/05 14:20:06, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11c
[2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11d
[2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11e
[2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11f
[2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 120
[2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 121
[2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
  api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 122

Any ideas?

Regards

Russell

-- 
Network and Systems Administrator           Flomerics Ltd
Email: russell.aspinwall at flomerics.co.uk 81 Bridge Road
Telephone: 020-8941-8810 x3116              Hampton Court
Facsimile: 020-8941-8730                    Surrey, KT8 9HH, UK

David Collier-Brown

2002-Mar-06 08:30 UTC

head link

[Samba] Help - Samba 2.2.3a + Solaris 8 7/01 - 64 bit binaries

Russell Aspinwall wrote:> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have compiled Samba 2.2.3a on Solaris 8 7/01 to produce 64 bit
> binaries and to use the 64 bit i/o functions.
> The compiled code has been installed on two identical Sun Servers, the
> key differences between the configurations is that one has the maximum
> number of file descriptors set to 65000 (Solaris configured for 65356)
> and has op locks disabled because it is being used with Clear Case.
> 
> Server One was added the NT Domain and is working normally.
> Server Two was added to the NT Domain (its initial max. file descriptors
> = 62000) and appeared to work normally. After upgrading to 65000 file
> descriptions and restarting samba, the server became accessible
> intermittently. When trying to access from a Windows NT 4.0 Workstation
> (SrvPk 6) via browsing the Network Neighbour it generated a
"<server>
> not accessible. RPC call failed to execute".
> 
> The smbd and nmbd logs are included below
 > [2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292)
>   api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 122
> 
> Any ideas?
	Hmmn, it's iterating through a list of possible
	FDs...
	try running pfiles and mail the list the
	result: that will tell us what files are in use
	which may give us a hint...

--dave
-- 
David Collier-Brown,           | Always do right. This will gratify 
Performance & Engineering      | some people and astonish the rest.
Americas Customer Engineering, |                      -- Mark Twain
(905) 415-2849                 | davecb@canada.sun.com

Seemingly Similar Threads

Search for more reasonably related threads

samba - Mar 2002 - Help - Samba 2.2.3a + Solaris 8 7/01 - 64 bit binaries

[Samba] Help - Samba 2.2.3a + Solaris 8 7/01 - 64 bit binaries

[Samba] Help - Samba 2.2.3a + Solaris 8 7/01 - 64 bit binaries

Seemingly Similar Threads