samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:08 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] New: rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380
Summary: rsync not backing up certain binaries
Product: rsync
Version: 2.5.7
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: enslaver at enslaver.com
QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org
I am rsyncing directories from one system to the other for nightly backups, I
have noticed it refuses to copy some binaries even though they have different
sizes, dates and checksum, i even tried with the -c option. The file
"runcbl"
is the one that is different.
Here is what is happening:
[root at inqdbvm RWzzz]# /usr/bin/rsync -aucvx --rsh="ssh" --delete
aries3:/RWzzz
/Backup/aries3
root at aries3's password:
receiving file list ... done
RWzzz/AP01/APFAUX01.DAT
RWzzz/AP01/APNOTF01.DAT
RWzzz/AP01/APRCUR01.DAT
RWzzz/AP01/PCOFIL01.DAT
RWzzz/AP01/VENFIL01.DAT
RWzzz/RWWRK/
RWzzz/AR02/CUSFIL02.DAT
RWzzz/AR02/CUSFIL02.vix
wrote 56072 bytes read 218126 bytes 4853.06 bytes/sec
total size is 2212191051 speedup is 8067.86
[root at inqdbvm RWzzz]# ls -la /Backup/aries3/RWzzz/runcbl
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1647880 Oct 15 2008
/Backup/aries3/RWzzz/runcbl
[root at aries3 RWzzz]# ls -la /RWzzz/runcbl
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2205724 Jul 21 2008 /RWzzz/runcbl
[root at inqdbvm RWzzz]# file runcbl
runcbl: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux
2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:17 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 ------- Comment #1 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2010-04-21 12:17 CST ------- Rsync 2.5.7 is six years old; we won't support it. If you're using an "enterprise" OS distribution, you can ask the vendor. Otherwise, please upgrade rsync. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:27 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 ------- Comment #2 from enslaver at enslaver.com 2010-04-21 12:27 CST ------- Attempted in 3.0.7, same issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:34 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380
matt at mattmccutchen.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Comment #3 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2010-04-21 12:34 CST -------
Ah. You are using the -u option, which tells rsync not to replace the newer
destination file with the older source file. If that's not what you want,
remove the -u option.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:40 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 ------- Comment #4 from enslaver at enslaver.com 2010-04-21 12:40 CST ------- Thanks, I saw that just now, I'm unsure how the backup file got modified to be newer than the one running but that solved it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
- Declaration of RuleThickness() in src/main/plotmath.c (PR#7380)
- acts_as_tree with acts_as_list
- I want a Fedora 20 system to be a member server and offer a share in a Windows 2008R2 Active Directory domain
- [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support