samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:08 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] New: rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 Summary: rsync not backing up certain binaries Product: rsync Version: 2.5.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: enslaver at enslaver.com QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org I am rsyncing directories from one system to the other for nightly backups, I have noticed it refuses to copy some binaries even though they have different sizes, dates and checksum, i even tried with the -c option. The file "runcbl" is the one that is different. Here is what is happening: [root at inqdbvm RWzzz]# /usr/bin/rsync -aucvx --rsh="ssh" --delete aries3:/RWzzz /Backup/aries3 root at aries3's password: receiving file list ... done RWzzz/AP01/APFAUX01.DAT RWzzz/AP01/APNOTF01.DAT RWzzz/AP01/APRCUR01.DAT RWzzz/AP01/PCOFIL01.DAT RWzzz/AP01/VENFIL01.DAT RWzzz/RWWRK/ RWzzz/AR02/CUSFIL02.DAT RWzzz/AR02/CUSFIL02.vix wrote 56072 bytes read 218126 bytes 4853.06 bytes/sec total size is 2212191051 speedup is 8067.86 [root at inqdbvm RWzzz]# ls -la /Backup/aries3/RWzzz/runcbl -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1647880 Oct 15 2008 /Backup/aries3/RWzzz/runcbl [root at aries3 RWzzz]# ls -la /RWzzz/runcbl -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2205724 Jul 21 2008 /RWzzz/runcbl [root at inqdbvm RWzzz]# file runcbl runcbl: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:17 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 ------- Comment #1 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2010-04-21 12:17 CST ------- Rsync 2.5.7 is six years old; we won't support it. If you're using an "enterprise" OS distribution, you can ask the vendor. Otherwise, please upgrade rsync. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:27 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 ------- Comment #2 from enslaver at enslaver.com 2010-04-21 12:27 CST ------- Attempted in 3.0.7, same issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:34 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 matt at mattmccutchen.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #3 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2010-04-21 12:34 CST ------- Ah. You are using the -u option, which tells rsync not to replace the newer destination file with the older source file. If that's not what you want, remove the -u option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Apr-21 17:40 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7380] rsync not backing up certain binaries
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 ------- Comment #4 from enslaver at enslaver.com 2010-04-21 12:40 CST ------- Thanks, I saw that just now, I'm unsure how the backup file got modified to be newer than the one running but that solved it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
- Declaration of RuleThickness() in src/main/plotmath.c (PR#7380)
- acts_as_tree with acts_as_list
- I want a Fedora 20 system to be a member server and offer a share in a Windows 2008R2 Active Directory domain
- [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support