Rahul Nabar
2009-Jun-20 22:58 UTC
which server to make client and which the server for rsync.
I am using rsync to keep a mirror of my 800GB /home (server1). The backup machine is a separate server (servr2). Currently I am running rsync daemon on server2 and invoking rsync daily via cron on server2. Are there design / performance considerations that influence which machine is made the server and which the client? Also, Is the rsync daemon the preferred way to o this backup? I can also cross mount via nfs. Would that help or worsen my performance? -- Rahul
Hendrik Visage
2009-Jun-21 00:40 UTC
which server to make client and which the server for rsync.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Rahul Nabar <rpnabar@gmail.com> wrote:> > Are there design / performance considerations that influence which > machine is made the server and which the client? >benchmark it ;)> Also, Is the rsync daemon the preferred way to o this backup? I can > also cross mount via nfs. Would that help or worsen my performance?The NFS mechanism I've found to be slower than the rsyncd method. Another to consider might be the ssh/rsh, but then the ssh might impact the transfer speeds. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
Michael Chletsos
2009-Jun-21 17:46 UTC
which server to make client and which the server for rsync.
>> Are there design / performance considerations that influence which >> machine is made the server and which the client?My rsync processes typically are wrapped in a script that performs other tasks on the backup server, so I like to pull my data down to the backup server. Basically if you need to do any processes after or before the rsync, it is nice to have the script run on the backup server.> benchmark it ;)always.