search for: 800gb

I have a 1.5TB disk that has several partitions. One of them is 900GB. Now I can only see 300GB. Where is the rest? Is there a command I can do to reach the rest of the data? Will scrub help? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I need some suggestions. Here's my setup: 800GB of Data 14,000,000+ Files No changes just additions Files range in size from 30k - 190k The files are laid out in a tree fashion like: BASE \-Directory ( Numerical Directory name from 0 - 1023 ) \-Directory ( Numerical Directory name from 0 - 1023 ) \- Files ( Up to 10...

...and FastCopy(1) from the Samba share to a local disk. * Verify the sha-256 sum on the files. From what I can see there is data corruption on many of the files. Sha-256 does not match. I copied the same files many times and the data corruption occurs within minutes. The total data set is about 800GB. When I disable io_uring, no data corruptions occur. I verified this with multiple TBs of data transferred and no corruptions were detected. Samba log files contain no errors, nor does dmesg. The Windows client detect no error when copying the files. I'd really like to debug this problem a...

Hi, we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM and dual P4 Xeon 3,2GHz). Our current not-so-high availability setup is based on a similar server with the same setup and a e...

...devs, I''ve been using btrfs on my file server since 2.6.32 and after upgrading to .33 I noticed that rebalancing took way longer than before. I have a 5 disk array used for a btrfs md setup, different hard drive sizes, brands, and interfaces. The last time I rebalanced I was using about 800GB of space on the 4.6TB array, and I started before I went to sleep and it was done when I woke up. I''m in the middle of a rebalance right now, currently using 950GB, and it has been a full day and the rebalancing is not done yet. Is this an expected change? Is there any way to tell how mu...

...re are others out there that people have found useful. I am considering putting the indexes on memory disks but I haven't scoped out the requirements for the central system yet (i.e. it is unclear to me how large the index will be for approximately 13 million messages take take up roughly 800GB of disk space. Any pointers are greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ---Jack Stewart

...I was wondering if opening more than one instance is recommended or feasible? I know that for services like nfs for example I have had opening many instances improve performance. I have 4 cores available so if there are any other parallization modes I'd be glad to know since I need to backup ~800GB data every day. -- Rahul

...re to a >> local disk. * Verify the sha-256 sum on the files. From what I can >> see there is data corruption on many of the files. Sha-256 does not >> match. I copied the same files many times and the data corruption >> occurs within minutes. The total data set is about 800GB. > Can you do checksums on file fragments so we can discover at what > offset (if non-zero) the corruption occurs. Yes, I will check this. I saw a patch on the kernel mailing list about possible corruptions in during re-scheduling. I wonder if this is the problem I am hitting. I'll m...

This might be a stupid question, but here goes... Would adding, say, 4 4 or 8gb usb keys as a zil make enough of a difference for writes on an iscsi shared vol? I am finding reads are not too bad (40is mb/s over gige on 2 500gb drives stripped) but writes top out at about 10 and drop a lot lower... If I where to add a couple usb keys for zil, would it make a difference? Thanks. Sent from a

Hello everyone, I just wanted to see if anyone has experience running Xen on: Dell 2950 III 2 x Quad 2.0 Ghz 1333Mhz FSB 32 GB DDR2 (8x4GB) 2 Disk Perc RAID 1 (7200 RPM SAS) Broadcom Dual Gigabit Ethernet LOM & TOE The requirements of each VM are not that high (and are all identical). I just want to run remote desktop and 1 other application at any given time (either a web based IE

Hello, I was hoping that this would work: http://blogs.sun.com/zhangfan/entry/how_to_turn_a_mirror I have 4x(1TB) disks, one of which is filled with 800GB of data (that I cant delete/backup somewhere else) > root at FSK-Backup:~# zpool create -f ambry raidz1 c4t0d0 c5t0d0 c5t1d0 > /dev/lofi/1 > root at FSK-Backup:~# zpool list > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > ambry 592G 132K 592G 0% ONLINE - I get t...

...t; local disk. * Verify the sha-256 sum on the files. From what I can > > > see there is data corruption on many of the files. Sha-256 does not > > > match. I copied the same files many times and the data corruption > > > occurs within minutes. The total data set is about 800GB. > > Can you do checksums on file fragments so we can discover at what offset > > (if non-zero) the corruption occurs. > Yes, I will check this. > > I saw a patch on the kernel mailing list about possible corruptions in > during re-scheduling. I wonder if this is the proble...

...; > > > files. From what I can see there is data corruption on many > > > > > of the files. Sha-256 does not match. I copied the same > > > > > files many times and the data corruption occurs within > > > > > minutes. The total data set is about 800GB. > > > > Can you do checksums on file fragments so we can discover at > > > > what offset (if non-zero) the corruption occurs. > > > Yes, I will check this. I saw a patch on the kernel mailing list > > > about possible corruptions in during re-scheduling. I...

(It was suggested I send a copy of this to ext3-users, so here it is - note that I need this RAID going so I've rebuilt with reiser, but would still appreciate suggestions; the message was original sent to the lkml) Hi, I've just built an 800GB RAID5 array and built an ext3 file system on it; on trying to copy data off the 200GB RAID it is replacing I'm starting to see errors of the form: kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,2)): ext3_new_block: Allocating block in system zone - block = 140509185 and kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md(...

...ested in this because I rsync data to a raid set for off-site storage, but I'm running out of space. I have some data that I want to be sure is on the raid set, and other data that I care less about and could delete some of to make sure the important data is transferred. I do this weekly to a 800Gb raid set, so wiping all the low-priority data, transferring the high-priority data and then rsyncing as much of low-priority data as will fit is not an option -- it would take too long. Thanks! Bart --- Bart Brashers, Ph.D. MFG Inc. 19203 36th Ave W Ste 101 Lynnwood WA 98036 425.921.4000 voice 42...

I am using rsync to keep a mirror of my 800GB /home (server1). The backup machine is a separate server (servr2). Currently I am running rsync daemon on server2 and invoking rsync daily via cron on server2. Are there design / performance considerations that influence which machine is made the server and which the client? Also, Is the rsync da...

...99/80475) 0 0% 0.00kB/s 0:00:00 565947 51% 529.39kB/s 0:00:01 1109277 100% 803.62kB/s 0:00:01 (xfer#3, to-check=69898/80475) ? I?d really like to know the name of each file that is being transferred. However, this job covers apparently >80K files comprising 800GB worth of data, so I suspect it?s skipping the explicit filename line that I see in smaller jobs. This job runs daily, and there are usually fewer than 1000 files actually transferred in any one run. The command I use is: /usr/bin/rsync -rpti --progress --stats --timeout=20 --exclude='.*'...

Hi there, I am pricing out a dell 840 (low end file server) that will run latest centos. Can anyone recommend a good tape drive/card combo with centos? The drives (to be backed up) in it will be a raid 0 - 500gb. Thanks in advance! Dustin

Hi all, Wondered if there are others in the community using GlusterFS on Google Compute Engine and Kubernetes via Google Container Engine together. We're running glusterfs 3.7.6 on Ubuntu Xenial across 3 GCE nodes. We have a single replicated volume of ~800GB that our pods running in Kubernetes are mounting. We've observed a pattern of soft lockups on our Kubernetes nodes that mount our Gluster volume. These nodes seem to be those that have the highest rate of reads/writes to the Gluster volume. An example looks like: [495498.074071] Kernel panic...

On Sunday March 16, gilbertd@treblig.org wrote: > Hi, > I've just built an 800GB RAID5 array and built an ext3 file system > on it; on trying to copy data off the 200GB RAID it is replacing I'm > starting to see errors of the form: > > kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,2)): ext3_new_block: Allocating block in > system zone - block = 140509185 > > and...