Hi -
is "rsync --version" reporting the wrong version number, or am I to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did:
download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches
folder?)
in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install
There was no error message, and the old /usr/local/bin/rsync was
replaced.
When I now issue "rsync --version" I get:
rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29
Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
<http://rsync.samba.org/>
Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks,
batchfiles,
inplace, IPv6, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums
which is not what I expected.
Any suggestions what I do wrong?
Kurt
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote:> is "rsync --version" reporting the wrong version number, or am I to > stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac? > > Here is what I did: > download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches > folder?) > in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install > There was no error message, and the old /usr/local/bin/rsync was > replaced. > > When I now issue "rsync --version" I get: > rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 > Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. > <http://rsync.samba.org/> > Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, > batchfiles, > inplace, IPv6, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums > > which is not what I expected.Make sure your $PATH is set so that the rsync you installed will be found first. When you have this right, "which rsync" should print /usr/local/bin/rsync . -- Matt
There are rsync patches available for Mac OS X which offer various meta-data support. If you decide to use these patches, then rsync will offer you some additional options. Details on compiling rsync with these patches on Mac OS X is available from the following URL : http://connect.homeunix.com/lbackup/developer/rsync_hfs Hope this helps.> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote: > > is "rsync --version" reporting the wrong version number, or am I to > > stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac? > > > > Here is what I did: > > download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches > > folder?) > > in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install > > There was no error message, and the old /usr/local/bin/rsync was > > replaced. > > > > When I now issue "rsync --version" I get: > > rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 > > Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and > others. > > <http://rsync.samba.org/> > > Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, > > batchfiles, > > inplace, IPv6, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit internal > inums > > > > which is not what I expected. > > Make sure your $PATH is set so that the rsync you installed will be > found first. When you have this right, "which rsync" should > print /usr/local/bin/rsync . > > -- > Matt > > -- > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing > list. > To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You could folllow the detailed instructions from Mike Bombich at http://www.bombich.com/mactips/rsync.html I am a beginner and the instructions are so clear that I was able to get the job done.
The following note never went through yesterday for some reason:
You probably know all of this already, but for those not familiar with
the mysteries of the Unix side of the Mac OS X, allow me to comment
here:
Assuming /usr/local/bin is in your $PATH (otherwise you must add it
first), there are at least two solutions to the path problem, in
which
rsync 2.6.9 (in /usr/bin) is in front of rsync 3.0.5 (in /usr/
local/bin)
1: rename /usr/bin/rsync to /usr/bin/rsync269, so that if you should
ever want to downgrade, you just have to change the name back to /
usr/
bin/rsync and away you go.
2: change your $PATH, so that /usr/local/bin comes before /usr/bin.
Then whatever version of rsync, or anything else, you have in /usr/
local/bin will be the version of that application that your Mac
sees.
Personally, I feel more comfortable keeping /usr/bin first in the
path
and I just always rename the Mac default versions whenever they get
reinstalled by an OS update, but there is really nothing wrong with
this solution, and it certainly is more permanent.
Under Leopard (MacOS X 10.5.x) rsync version 2.6.9 is installed by
default in /usr/bin. Whenever Apple updates the system and does
anything that "updates" rsync it will check if rsync 2.6.9 is
present
as "/usr/bin/rsync". If it does not find it it will
"helpfully"
reinstall it for you. Thus, every time Apple "updates" anything
with
regard to rsync and reinstalls it you have to rename it again, if
you
use solution 1... which can be a pain in the neck.
--Rob>
>
>> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote:
>> > is "rsync --version" reporting the wrong version number,
or am I to
>> > stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
>> >
>> > Here is what I did:
>> > download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra
>> patches
>> > folder?)
>> > in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install
>> > There was no error message, and the old /usr/local/bin/rsync was
>> > replaced.
>> >
>> > When I now issue "rsync --version" I get:
>> > rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29
>> > Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and
>> others.
>> > <http://rsync.samba.org/>
>> > Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks,
>> > batchfiles,
>> > inplace, IPv6, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit
>> internal inums
>> >
>> > which is not what I expected.
>>
>> Make sure your $PATH is set so that the rsync you installed will be
>> found first. When you have this right, "which rsync" should
>> print /usr/local/bin/rsync .
>>
>> --
>> Matt
>>
>> --
>> Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing
>> list.
>> To unsubscribe or change options:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
>> Before posting, read:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
> --
> Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing
> list.
> To unsubscribe or change options:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
Alternatively, you can just install your freshly compiled version of rsync by issuing the following command : "sudo make install" Then when you want to use this version of rsync issue the following command : "/usr/local/bin/rsync" This way you will not have any issues with system updates. In addition, if any utilities expect the standard apple version to be installed in the default location they will continue to work as expected.> The following note never went through yesterday for some reason: > > > You probably know all of this already, but for those not familiar with > the mysteries of the Unix side of the Mac OS X, allow me to comment > here: > > > Assuming /usr/local/bin is in your $PATH (otherwise you must add it > first), there are at least two solutions to the path problem, in > which > rsync 2.6.9 (in /usr/bin) is in front of rsync 3.0.5 (in /usr/ > local/bin) > > 1: rename /usr/bin/rsync to /usr/bin/rsync269, so that if you should > ever want to downgrade, you just have to change the name back to / > usr/ > bin/rsync and away you go. > > 2: change your $PATH, so that /usr/local/bin comes before /usr/bin. > Then whatever version of rsync, or anything else, you have in /usr/ > local/bin will be the version of that application that your Mac > sees. > Personally, I feel more comfortable keeping /usr/bin first in the > path > and I just always rename the Mac default versions whenever they get > reinstalled by an OS update, but there is really nothing wrong with > this solution, and it certainly is more permanent. > > Under Leopard (MacOS X 10.5.x) rsync version 2.6.9 is installed by > default in /usr/bin. Whenever Apple updates the system and does > anything that "updates" rsync it will check if rsync 2.6.9 is > present > as "/usr/bin/rsync". If it does not find it it will "helpfully" > reinstall it for you. Thus, every time Apple "updates" anything with > regard to rsync and reinstalls it you have to rename it again, if > you > use solution 1... which can be a pain in the neck. > > > --Rob > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote: > > > > > is "rsync --version" reporting the wrong version number, or am I to > > > > > stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac? > > > > > > > > > > Here is what I did: > > > > > download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches > > > > > folder?) > > > > > in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install > > > > > There was no error message, and the old /usr/local/bin/rsync was > > > > > replaced. > > > > > > > > > > When I now issue "rsync --version" I get: > > > > > rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 > > > > > Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and > others. > > > > > <http://rsync.samba.org/> > > > > > Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, > > > > > batchfiles, > > > > > inplace, IPv6, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit internal > inums > > > > > > > > > > which is not what I expected. > > > > > > > > Make sure your $PATH is set so that the rsync you installed will be > > > > found first. When you have this right, "which rsync" should > > > > print /usr/local/bin/rsync . > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing > list. > > > > To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > > > > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > > -- > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing > list. > To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > > -- > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing > list. > To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Alternatively, you can just install your freshly compiled version of rsync by issuing the following command : "sudo make install" Then when you want to use this version of rsync issue the following command : "/usr/local/bin/rsync" This way you will not have any issues with system updates. In addition, if any utilities expect the standard apple version to be installed in the default location they will continue to work as expected.> The following note never went through yesterday for some reason: > > > You probably know all of this already, but for those not familiar with > the mysteries of the Unix side of the Mac OS X, allow me to comment > here: > > > Assuming /usr/local/bin is in your $PATH (otherwise you must add it > first), there are at least two solutions to the path problem, in > which > rsync 2.6.9 (in /usr/bin) is in front of rsync 3.0.5 (in /usr/ > local/bin) > > 1: rename /usr/bin/rsync to /usr/bin/rsync269, so that if you should > ever want to downgrade, you just have to change the name back to / > usr/ > bin/rsync and away you go. > > 2: change your $PATH, so that /usr/local/bin comes before /usr/bin. > Then whatever version of rsync, or anything else, you have in /usr/ > local/bin will be the version of that application that your Mac > sees. > Personally, I feel more comfortable keeping /usr/bin first in the > path > and I just always rename the Mac default versions whenever they get > reinstalled by an OS update, but there is really nothing wrong with > this solution, and it certainly is more permanent. > > Under Leopard (MacOS X 10.5.x) rsync version 2.6.9 is installed by > default in /usr/bin. Whenever Apple updates the system and does > anything that "updates" rsync it will check if rsync 2.6.9 is > present > as "/usr/bin/rsync". If it does not find it it will "helpfully" > reinstall it for you. Thus, every time Apple "updates" anything with > regard to rsync and reinstalls it you have to rename it again, if > you > use solution 1... which can be a pain in the neck. > > > --Rob > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote: > > > > > is "rsync --version" reporting the wrong version number, or am I to > > > > > stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac? > > > > > > > > > > Here is what I did: > > > > > download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches > > > > > folder?) > > > > > in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install > > > > > There was no error message, and the old /usr/local/bin/rsync was > > > > > replaced. > > > > > > > > > > When I now issue "rsync --version" I get: > > > > > rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 > > > > > Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and > others. > > > > > <http://rsync.samba.org/> > > > > > Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, > > > > > batchfiles, > > > > > inplace, IPv6, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit internal > inums > > > > > > > > > > which is not what I expected. > > > > > > > > Make sure your $PATH is set so that the rsync you installed will be > > > > found first. When you have this right, "which rsync" should > > > > print /usr/local/bin/rsync . > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing > list. > > > > To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > > > > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > > -- > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing > list. > To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > > -- > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing > list. > To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html