Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam
2008-Dec-15 17:17 UTC
weird interaction between --delete-delay and --partial-dir when transfer is interrupted
Hi, I'm not sure if this is a bug, but after reading the manual, this does not seem like expected behavior. I'm using the following rsync command to approximate an atomic update (I can't use --link-dest as hard links in hfsplus filesystems are fubar under linux as of 2.6.27): rsync -a --delete-excluded --backup --backup-dir=../bar.archive --backup-suffix=.2008-12-15-0115 --delete-delay --delay-updates --partial-dir=.rsync-partial --verbose --human-readable --log-file=/bar.rsync-log host:/foo/ /bar If a transfer is interrupted, .rsync-partial/ directories are left over in the backup directory, as expected. The next rsync run exits with non-zero exit status even though all files are transferred (verified this using md5sum). A third rsync run transfers nothing (going by the log file) but exits with success. I'm guessing this is because: (1) --delete-excluded causes the .rsync-partial/ directories to be marked for deletion during file list generation time of the second rsync run (there are no .rsync-partial/ directories in host:/foo/), (2) successful transfer of all files during the second run results in rsync removing the .rsync-partial/ directories as they become empty, and (3) --delete-delay which I understand is necessary to allow rsync to use the files in .rsync-partial/ to speed up the second transfer, fails to find the .rsync-partial/ directories at the end of the transfer and complains. The third transfer sees no .rsync-partial/ directories in /bar and so returns success. I would like the second run to return success if all files are transferred. Is there some option I'm supposed to use (e.g. --filter) or is this a bug? Shiv
Michal Soltys
2008-Dec-21 01:25 UTC
weird interaction between --delete-delay and --partial-dir when transfer is interrupted
Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam wrote:> Hi, > > I'm not sure if this is a bug, but after reading the manual, this does > not seem like expected behavior. I'm using the following rsync command > to approximate an atomic update (I can't use --link-dest as hard links > in hfsplus filesystems are fubar under linux as of 2.6.27): > > rsync -a --delete-excluded --backup --backup-dir=../bar.archive > --backup-suffix=.2008-12-15-0115 --delete-delay --delay-updates > --partial-dir=.rsync-partial --verbose --human-readable > --log-file=/bar.rsync-log host:/foo/ /bar > > If a transfer is interrupted, .rsync-partial/ directories are left over > in the backup directory, as expected. The next rsync run exits with > non-zero exit status even though all files are transferred (verified > this using md5sum). A third rsync run transfers nothing (going by the > log file) but exits with success. I'm guessing this is because: (1) > --delete-excluded causes the .rsync-partial/ directories to be marked > for deletion during file list generation time of the second rsync run > (there are no .rsync-partial/ directories in host:/foo/), (2) successful > transfer of all files during the second run results in rsync removing > the .rsync-partial/ directories as they become empty, and (3) > --delete-delay which I understand is necessary to allow rsync to use the > files in .rsync-partial/ to speed up the second transfer, fails to find > the .rsync-partial/ directories at the end of the transfer and > complains. The third transfer sees no .rsync-partial/ directories in > /bar and so returns success. > > I would like the second run to return success if all files are > transferred. Is there some option I'm supposed to use (e.g. --filter) > or is this a bug? > > ShivWhat is the exact exit value after the 2nd run - 23 perhaps ? You can do a simple test: touch /test/src/a mkdir /test/dst/.rp rsync -a -vvvv --delete-excluded --delay-updates --delete-delay --partial-dir=.rp /test/src/ /test/dst/ | less In this case, rsync will exit with value 23. It looks like rsync is deleting .rp before any file transfer starts. If you put any bogus file in .rp before rsync call, it will exit with 0 though. Looks like it prevents it from a deletion. If you remove delete-excluded, it will work as expected with or w/o bogus file (with bogus file, .rp dir will not get deleted, otherwise it will), exit value is 0 in both cases. It does look like sort of a tiny bug. Or maybe there's something subtle we're missing. Either way - as a workaround, you could drop delete-excluded, and then just finalize the thing with something like: find /bar/ -depth -name ".rsync-partial" -exec rm -rf "{}" \; Rsync will usually clean up after itself - only bogus files (not being part of the transfer) would prevent it from doing so, as far as I can see.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5654] New: Combination of --remove-sent-files, --partial, --partial-dir, --tmp-dir and --delay-updates can cause data loss
- Problem/Bug when syncing subdirectory structures with delay-updates and partial-dir
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5977] New: --delay-updates --partial-dir
- Anyone know how to receive partial (interrupted) faxes with app_fax?
- --partial replaces destination file on interrupted transfer