Hi Recently I sent a modified version of the GetBundle bundle to textmate-dev. It was failing because the RSpec bundle was from another repo (ie RubyForge). One of the replies said that the RSpec bundle was now in the MacroMates repo, which it is. Is that an officially handled thing? If so, what version of the RSpec bundle is being maintained there - CURRENT? It''s confusing having it available in two locations. Ashley -- blog @ http://aviewfromafar.net/ linked-in @ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran currently @ home
On 10/20/07, Ashley Moran <work at ashleymoran.me.uk> wrote:> Hi > > Recently I sent a modified version of the GetBundle bundle to > textmate-dev. It was failing because the RSpec bundle was from > another repo (ie RubyForge). One of the replies said that the RSpec > bundle was now in the MacroMates repo, which it is. Is that an > officially handled thing? If so, what version of the RSpec bundle is > being maintained there - CURRENT? It''s confusing having it available > in two locations.Apologies for the confusion. This is a recent development (well, a couple of months ago now) and I haven''t made any formal announcement about it. The plan is to keep the TextMate repo''s version aligned with the latest release. So part of our release process will be to update that version. If you''re using RSpec''s trunk, you should use the the version in trunk. This sound reasonable?
On Oct 20, 2007, at 5:29 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:> Apologies for the confusion. This is a recent development (well, a > couple of months ago now) and I haven''t made any formal announcement > about it. > > The plan is to keep the TextMate repo''s version aligned with the > latest release. So part of our release process will be to update that > version. If you''re using RSpec''s trunk, you should use the the version > in trunk. > > This sound reasonable?Yes that seems like the best solution. I was just puzzled by the lack of an announcement - I wondered if one of the textmate devs spontaneously copied the RSpec bundle across. Ashley -- blog @ http://aviewfromafar.net/ linked-in @ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran currently @ home
On 10/20/07, Ashley Moran <mail at ashleymoran.me.uk> wrote:> > On Oct 20, 2007, at 5:29 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > Apologies for the confusion. This is a recent development (well, a > > couple of months ago now) and I haven''t made any formal announcement > > about it. > > > > The plan is to keep the TextMate repo''s version aligned with the > > latest release. So part of our release process will be to update that > > version. If you''re using RSpec''s trunk, you should use the the version > > in trunk. > > > > This sound reasonable? > > Yes that seems like the best solution. I was just puzzled by the > lack of an announcement - I wondered if one of the textmate devs > spontaneously copied the RSpec bundle across.No. This happened quite spontaneously at the Lone Star Ruby Conference as a result of conversations between me and James Edward Gray II, who is a TM committer.