search for: bundl

I asked this question earlier and did recieve an answer but I am not sure Ifully understood the answer as I am getting all sorts of errors when trying to implement. Basically I want to add a layer to the path for my files. I have the following set up in my model class: file_column :image, :store_dir => :dynamic_dir def dynamic_dir

Hi, I can''t get breakpointer to work on locomotive. Pretty sure it used to work... Any ideas?? Jeroen jeroen$ ruby script/breakpointer /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-max.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/drb/drb.rb:828:in `getaddrinfo'': getaddrinfo: No address associated with nodename (SocketError) from /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-max.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/drb/drb.rb:828:in `...

...; 2: <li> 3: <% if defined? repeat %> 4: <a href="javascript:void(0);" Trace of template inclusion: /personal_pages/your_locker_door.html.erb RAILS_ROOT: /Users/philsmy/development/BSG Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace /Applications/Locomotive2/Bundles/rmagickRailsMar2007_i386.locobundle/framework/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/RubyInline-3.6.7/lib/inline.rb:78:in `mkdir'' /Applications/Locomotive2/Bundles/rmagickRailsMar2007_i386.locobundle/framework/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/RubyInline-3.6.7/lib/inline.rb:78:in `rootdir'' /Applications...

Here''s my case: Using a link_to popup window to show a related help file of an element on a page. The problem: Window pops up perfectly, but refuses to carryover @instance variables in the controller that I referenced in the link_to command. The tests: - I have the right controller/class, because it renders a specific template, which is what it does. - I have the right template/view,

Whatever I do to try to connect including trying different ISPs, I get the same errors, here they are: Errno::ECONNREFUSED in Events#send_my_email Connection refused - connect(2) Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-0.14.1-min.bundle/Contents/ Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:83:in `initialize'' /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-0.14.1-min.bundle/Contents/ Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:83:in `new'' /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-0.14.1-min.bundl...

Machine Instruction Bundle in LLVM Hi all, There have been quite a bit of discussions about adding machine instruction bundle to support VLIW targets. I have been pondering what the right representation should be and what kind of impact it might have on the LLVM code generator. I believe I have a fairly good plan now and...

I am using machine instruction bundles [1] before register allocation. This appears not to be too common today and I'd really like some input on the intentions and plans of the current system. And would like some input on clean up proposals. [1] I am currently experimenting to use machine instruction bundles to reliably form macr...

...g.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating lib/dummy config.status: creating zlib/dummy config.status: creating popt/dummy config.status: creating shconfig config.status: creating config.h config.status: config.h is unchanged rsync 3.0.1 configuration successful # make (Bundled) cc: warning 422: Unknown option "-Wno-unused-parameter" ignored. (Bundled) cc: "lib/pool_alloc.h", line 10: error 1000: Unexpected symbol: "size". (Bundled) cc: "lib/pool_alloc.h", line 10: warning 5: "const" will become a keyword. (Bundled) cc:...

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: > > == BUNDLE instruction / operands == > For many backend passes a bundle can appear as a single unit. However one important tool > here is having an iterator over all operands of this unit. > > The original RFC indicates that to achieve this without changing a big number > of passes an additio...

...veloper to add some optimization passes after the packetizer. Instead, I would add the packetizer as a separate pass. It is true that the packetizer must deal in that case with PHI and COPY nodes that are eliminated by the RA. The packetizer can simple group all PHI and COPY instruction into single bundles consisting of only one instruction. >From my experience a simple packetizer that groups instruction into bundles (like the old IA-64 back-end did) without changing the order of the instructions produces bad code. Instead, a VLIW scheduler that directly outputs bundles produces better code. Th...

Hi, We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles *before* RA to model certain constraints, e.g. the exposed one by Tzu-Chien a while ago in his thread http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html In order to build bundles, we have added a new bottom-up MIScheduler, right after...

...t is a bit trickier.. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 2:40 PM To: LLVM Dev Subject: [LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle Machine Instruction Bundle in LLVM Hi all, There have been quite a bit of discussions about adding machine instruction bundle to support VLIW targets. I have been pondering what the right representation should be and what kind of impact it might have on the LLVM code generator. I belie...

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: >> >> == BUNDLE instruction / operands == >> For many backend passes a bundle can appear as a single unit. However one important tool >> here is having an iterator over all operands of this unit. >> >> The original RFC indicates that to achieve this without changing a big number >>...

...-- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 2:40 PM > To: LLVM Dev > Subject: [LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle > > Machine Instruction Bundle in LLVM > > Hi all, > > There have been quite a bit of discussions about adding machine instruction bundle to support VLIW targets. I have been pondering what the right representation should be and what kind of impact it might have on the LLVM...

Evan, I will need to comprehend it better, but one small comment right away. Did we not discuss one more option for bundle implementation - global cycle ID. We would add an unsigned int field to MI definition representing "global scheduling cycle". All MIs with the same global cycle value belong to one group/packet. Zero means unscheduled MI. That is light weight, position independent (means if instru...

...toklund at 2pi.dk <mailto:stoklund at 2pi.dk>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com <mailto:ivanllopard at gmail.com>> wrote: > We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on > instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles *before* RA to > model certain constraints, e.g. the exposed one by Tzu-Chien a while ago > in his thread > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html The bundle support in the tree should handle co...

Jakob, > The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from > the old style a little too quickly. I wanted to avoid bugs from a > global s/setIsInsideBundle/bundleWithPred/g search and replace. This is a good intent. Maybe a bit temporal but sound nevertheless. > finalizeBundle is calling 'MIBundleBuilder Bundle(MBB, FirstMI, > LastMI)' which ought to work with pre-bundled instructions. Not exactly. Let me illustrate couple cases h...

...ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ''WHERE id = 1'' at line 1: UPDATE products SET WHERE id = 1 from /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-min.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.13.2/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:88:in `log'' from /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-min.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activere...

On Jun 6, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: > We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on > instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles *before* RA to > model certain constraints, e.g. the exposed one by Tzu-Chien a while ago > in his thread > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html The bundle support in the tree should handle constraints like that....

Hi Quentin and llvm-dev, I've got a regalloc-related question that you might have an opinion or answer about. In our out-of-tree target we've been doing some bundling before register allocation for quite some time now, and last night a new problem popped up. What the fix should be depends on if this bundle is legal or not: BUNDLE %vreg39<imp-def,dead> * %vreg39:hiAcc<def> = mv_ar16_ar16_lo16In32 %vreg37 [...] %vreg39 isn'...