Rails - Jul 2012 - can I keep the records order using a scope : where(:id => geo_ids)

I am using this scope , in which geo_ids is a sorted array of
Ids ...

 scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |geo_ids|
    where(:id => geo_ids)
  }

is the resulting output always sorted according to this order ? or
should I modify it ?

thanks for your feedback

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

On 25 July 2012 13:35, Erwin <yves_dufour-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
>  I am using this scope , in which geo_ids is a sorted array of
> Ids ...
>
>  scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |geo_ids|
>     where(:id => geo_ids)
>   }
>
> is the resulting output always sorted according to this order ? or
> should I modify it ?
Since you have not specified any sort specification the order is not
defined.  If you want a particular order you must specify it.

Colin
>
> thanks for your feedback
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Thanks Colin for your answer

let me draw the big picture :
in my iatme controller ,before the display ( scope and pagination) , I
searched for geolocalized data of item ( with distance from the
search), and I get a sorted array of Item Ids, (already sorted on the
distance :  item_ids = [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...] )


then I display the items using Kaminari pagination  ( Kaminary doesn''t
paginate an array )

@items = Item.geo_filtered_with(geo_ids).page params[:page]

and my model scope is :

  scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |item_ids|
    where(:id => item_ids)
  }

so I wonder if the result of the scope will keep the same order as the
item_ids
which means :
items.id IN [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...]  will always get items records  5, 2,
1, 10 .... in this order

that''s why I did not specified a sort order with the scope, is it
clear ?



On 25 juil, 14:38, Colin Law
<clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 13:35, Erwin
<yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> >  I am using this scope , in which geo_ids is a sorted array of
> > Ids ...
>
> >  scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |geo_ids|
> >     where(:id => geo_ids)
> >   }
>
> > is the resulting output always sorted according to this order ? or
> > should I modify it ?
>
> Since you have not specified any sort specification the order is not
> defined.  If you want a particular order you must specify it.
>
> Colin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > thanks for your feedback
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

It will not be sorted. You just pass an array basically to that named
scope. And you will get results that satisfy the array so to speak, but it
can come in any order. Just add .order(''id DESC'')  (or ASC)
clause
explicitly.

2012/7/25 Erwin <yves_dufour-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org>
> Thanks Colin for your answer
>
> let me draw the big picture :
> in my iatme controller ,before the display ( scope and pagination) , I
> searched for geolocalized data of item ( with distance from the
> search), and I get a sorted array of Item Ids, (already sorted on the
> distance :  item_ids = [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...] )
>
>
> then I display the items using Kaminari pagination  ( Kaminary
doesn''t
> paginate an array )
>
> @items = Item.geo_filtered_with(geo_ids).page params[:page]
>
> and my model scope is :
>
>   scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |item_ids|
>     where(:id => item_ids)
>   }
>
> so I wonder if the result of the scope will keep the same order as the
> item_ids
> which means :
> items.id IN [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...]  will always get items records  5, 2,
> 1, 10 .... in this order
>
> that''s why I did not specified a sort order with the scope, is it
> clear ?
>
>
>
> On 25 juil, 14:38, Colin Law
<clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On 25 July 2012 13:35, Erwin
<yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > >  I am using this scope , in which geo_ids is a sorted array of
> > > Ids ...
> >
> > >  scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |geo_ids|
> > >     where(:id => geo_ids)
> > >   }
> >
> > > is the resulting output always sorted according to this order ?
or
> > > should I modify it ?
> >
> > Since you have not specified any sort specification the order is not
> > defined.  If you want a particular order you must specify it.
> >
> > Colin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > thanks for your feedback
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
> Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
> .
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Pagarbiai,
Gintautas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

As far as your clarification goes, well it depends on whether or not you
can sort with SQL. If you cannot, then you are left with sorting results
with your custom Ruby code.

BTW Kaminari can paginate an arbitrary array, so you might work with that
(by defining a sorting method or something more/less complicated).


2012/7/25 Gintautas Šimkus
<dihitales-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> It will not be sorted. You just pass an array basically to that named
> scope. And you will get results that satisfy the array so to speak, but it
> can come in any order. Just add .order(''id DESC'')  (or
ASC) clause
> explicitly.
>
>
> 2012/7/25 Erwin <yves_dufour-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org>
>
>> Thanks Colin for your answer
>>
>> let me draw the big picture :
>> in my iatme controller ,before the display ( scope and pagination) , I
>> searched for geolocalized data of item ( with distance from the
>> search), and I get a sorted array of Item Ids, (already sorted on the
>> distance :  item_ids = [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...] )
>>
>>
>> then I display the items using Kaminari pagination  ( Kaminary
doesn''t
>> paginate an array )
>>
>> @items = Item.geo_filtered_with(geo_ids).page params[:page]
>>
>> and my model scope is :
>>
>>   scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |item_ids|
>>     where(:id => item_ids)
>>   }
>>
>> so I wonder if the result of the scope will keep the same order as the
>> item_ids
>> which means :
>> items.id IN [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...]  will always get items records  5, 2,
>> 1, 10 .... in this order
>>
>> that''s why I did not specified a sort order with the scope, is
it
>> clear ?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25 juil, 14:38, Colin Law
<clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > On 25 July 2012 13:35, Erwin
<yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > >  I am using this scope , in which geo_ids is a sorted array
of
>> > > Ids ...
>> >
>> > >  scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |geo_ids|
>> > >     where(:id => geo_ids)
>> > >   }
>> >
>> > > is the resulting output always sorted according to this order
? or
>> > > should I modify it ?
>> >
>> > Since you have not specified any sort specification the order is
not
>> > defined.  If you want a particular order you must specify it.
>> >
>> > Colin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > thanks for your feedback
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
>> Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> > > To post to this group, send email to
>> rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> > > For more options,
visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pagarbiai,
> Gintautas
>


-- 
Pagarbiai,
Gintautas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

thanks , I uses I was not clear enough...
 if I do:  where(:id => item_ids).order(''id DESC'')  then
the output
will not be what I want
in this case,
items.id IN [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...] will give  => [1, 2, 5, 10, ..]

this is exactly what I don''t want .. I want to keep:  where(:id =>
item_ids) with  order the same as the array




On 25 juil, 16:11, Gintautas Šimkus
<dihita...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> It will not be sorted. You just pass an array basically to that named
> scope. And you will get results that satisfy the array so to speak, but it
> can come in any order. Just add .order(''id DESC'')  (or
ASC) clause
> explicitly.
>
> 2012/7/25 Erwin <yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks Colin for your answer
>
> > let me draw the big picture :
> > in my iatme controller ,before the display ( scope and pagination) , I
> > searched for geolocalized data of item ( with distance from the
> > search), and I get a sorted array of Item Ids, (already sorted on the
> > distance :  item_ids = [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...] )
>
> > then I display the items using Kaminari pagination  ( Kaminary
doesn''t
> > paginate an array )
>
> > @items = Item.geo_filtered_with(geo_ids).page params[:page]
>
> > and my model scope is :
>
> >   scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |item_ids|
> >     where(:id => item_ids)
> >   }
>
> > so I wonder if the result of the scope will keep the same order as the
> > item_ids
> > which means :
> > items.id IN [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...]  will always get items records  5, 2,
> > 1, 10 .... in this order
>
> > that''s why I did not specified a sort order with the scope,
is it
> > clear ?
>
> > On 25 juil, 14:38, Colin Law
<clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > On 25 July 2012 13:35, Erwin
<yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > >  I am using this scope , in which geo_ids is a sorted array
of
> > > > Ids ...
>
> > > >  scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |geo_ids|
> > > >     where(:id => geo_ids)
> > > >   }
>
> > > > is the resulting output always sorted according to this
order ? or
> > > > should I modify it ?
>
> > > Since you have not specified any sort specification the order is
not
> > > defined.  If you want a particular order you must specify it.
>
> > > Colin
>
> > > > thanks for your feedback
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
> > Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > > > For more options,
visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> Pagarbiai,
> Gintautas
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

OK, and thanks a lot
using Kaminari.paginate_array(@geo_items)  solved my issue ...
I can get an array of items in which I can insert the distance from
the search point and sort the array on this distance..
I could not save this info into the item instance as it depends upon
each user''s search ...

thanks a lot again !!

On 25 juil, 16:18, Gintautas Šimkus
<dihita...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> As far as your clarification goes, well it depends on whether or not you
> can sort with SQL. If you cannot, then you are left with sorting results
> with your custom Ruby code.
>
> BTW Kaminari can paginate an arbitrary array, so you might work with that
> (by defining a sorting method or something more/less complicated).
>
> 2012/7/25 Gintautas Šimkus
<dihita...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > It will not be sorted. You just pass an array basically to that named
> > scope. And you will get results that satisfy the array so to speak,
but it
> > can come in any order. Just add .order(''id DESC'')
 (or ASC) clause
> > explicitly.
>
> > 2012/7/25 Erwin <yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org>
>
> >> Thanks Colin for your answer
>
> >> let me draw the big picture :
> >> in my iatme controller ,before the display ( scope and pagination)
, I
> >> searched for geolocalized data of item ( with distance from the
> >> search), and I get a sorted array of Item Ids, (already sorted on
the
> >> distance :  item_ids = [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...] )
>
> >> then I display the items using Kaminari pagination  ( Kaminary
doesn''t
> >> paginate an array )
>
> >> @items = Item.geo_filtered_with(geo_ids).page params[:page]
>
> >> and my model scope is :
>
> >>   scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |item_ids|
> >>     where(:id => item_ids)
> >>   }
>
> >> so I wonder if the result of the scope will keep the same order as
the
> >> item_ids
> >> which means :
> >> items.id IN [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...]  will always get items records  5,
2,
> >> 1, 10 .... in this order
>
> >> that''s why I did not specified a sort order with the
scope, is it
> >> clear ?
>
> >> On 25 juil, 14:38, Colin Law
<clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> > On 25 July 2012 13:35, Erwin
<yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> >> > >  I am using this scope , in which geo_ids is a sorted
array of
> >> > > Ids ...
>
> >> > >  scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |geo_ids|
> >> > >     where(:id => geo_ids)
> >> > >   }
>
> >> > > is the resulting output always sorted according to this
order ? or
> >> > > should I modify it ?
>
> >> > Since you have not specified any sort specification the order
is not
> >> > defined.  If you want a particular order you must specify it.
>
> >> > Colin
>
> >> > > thanks for your feedback
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to
the Google
> >> Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> >> rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> >> > > For more options,
visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
> >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> >> For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > --
> > Pagarbiai,
> > Gintautas
>
> --
> Pagarbiai,
> Gintautas
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Sure, glad it helped, it''s not a trivial problem you''ve just
taken care of!
:)

I mean that''s the process basically (until you deploy to prod at
least):
fix thing A, then fix things B and C that depended on previous A''s
implementation and so on. Try to get into RSpec so that a solved problem
stays that way.

2012/7/25 Erwin <yves_dufour-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org>
> OK, and thanks a lot
> using Kaminari.paginate_array(@geo_items)  solved my issue ...
> I can get an array of items in which I can insert the distance from
> the search point and sort the array on this distance..
> I could not save this info into the item instance as it depends upon
> each user''s search ...
>
> thanks a lot again !!
>
> On 25 juil, 16:18, Gintautas Šimkus
<dihita...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > As far as your clarification goes, well it depends on whether or not
you
> > can sort with SQL. If you cannot, then you are left with sorting
results
> > with your custom Ruby code.
> >
> > BTW Kaminari can paginate an arbitrary array, so you might work with
that
> > (by defining a sorting method or something more/less complicated).
> >
> > 2012/7/25 Gintautas Šimkus
<dihita...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > It will not be sorted. You just pass an array basically to that
named
> > > scope. And you will get results that satisfy the array so to
speak,
> but it
> > > can come in any order. Just add .order(''id
DESC'')  (or ASC) clause
> > > explicitly.
> >
> > > 2012/7/25 Erwin <yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > >> Thanks Colin for your answer
> >
> > >> let me draw the big picture :
> > >> in my iatme controller ,before the display ( scope and
pagination) , I
> > >> searched for geolocalized data of item ( with distance from
the
> > >> search), and I get a sorted array of Item Ids, (already
sorted on the
> > >> distance :  item_ids = [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...] )
> >
> > >> then I display the items using Kaminari pagination  (
Kaminary doesn''t
> > >> paginate an array )
> >
> > >> @items = Item.geo_filtered_with(geo_ids).page params[:page]
> >
> > >> and my model scope is :
> >
> > >>   scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |item_ids|
> > >>     where(:id => item_ids)
> > >>   }
> >
> > >> so I wonder if the result of the scope will keep the same
order as the
> > >> item_ids
> > >> which means :
> > >> items.id IN [ 5, 2, 1, 10, ...]  will always get items
records  5, 2,
> > >> 1, 10 .... in this order
> >
> > >> that''s why I did not specified a sort order with the
scope, is it
> > >> clear ?
> >
> > >> On 25 juil, 14:38, Colin Law
<clan...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > On 25 July 2012 13:35, Erwin
<yves_duf...-ee4meeAH724@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > >> > >  I am using this scope , in which geo_ids is a
sorted array of
> > >> > > Ids ...
> >
> > >> > >  scope :geo_filtered_with, lambda { |geo_ids|
> > >> > >     where(:id => geo_ids)
> > >> > >   }
> >
> > >> > > is the resulting output always sorted according to
this order ? or
> > >> > > should I modify it ?
> >
> > >> > Since you have not specified any sort specification the
order is not
> > >> > defined.  If you want a particular order you must
specify it.
> >
> > >> > Colin
> >
> > >> > > thanks for your feedback
> >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > You received this message because you are
subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > >>
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > For more options,
visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
> Groups
> > >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > >> For more options,
visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >
> > > --
> > > Pagarbiai,
> > > Gintautas
> >
> > --
> > Pagarbiai,
> > Gintautas
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Pagarbiai,
Gintautas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.