Ever since upgrading an app to rails 3.0.5 the time breakdowns at the bottom of each action don''t come close to adding up. Further, the app feels significantly slower. Completed 200 OK in 1684ms (Views: 165.1ms | ActiveRecord: 6.6ms | Sphinx: 0.0ms) 165 + 6 + 0 isn''t anywhere close to 1684. All of my actions have this kind of discrepancy?? Where''s this lost time going? None of the SQL statements or individual renders have big numbers... Something is missing. Thoughts? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
On 16 April 2011 20:18, Josh <josh.m.sharpe-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Ever since upgrading an app to rails 3.0.5 the time breakdowns at the > bottom of each action don''t come close to adding up. Further, the app > feels significantly slower. > > Completed 200 OK in 1684ms (Views: 165.1ms | ActiveRecord: 6.6ms | > Sphinx: 0.0ms) > > 165 + 6 + 0 isn''t anywhere close to 1684. > > All of my actions have this kind of discrepancy?? Where''s this lost > time going? > > None of the SQL statements or individual renders have big numbers... > Something is missing. Thoughts?What did you upgrade from? Have you upgraded the ruby version also? Are you running in production mode? What OS are you running under? Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
> What did you upgrade from?2.3.11> > Have you upgraded the ruby version also?ree, latest> > Are you running in production mode?no - this is in development> > What OS are you running under?OSX for dev> > Colin-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
production isn''t bad at all: Completed 200 OK in 24ms (Views: 19.5ms | ActiveRecord: 2.2ms | Sphinx: 0.0ms) However, it''s highly annoying to wait for 1 second requests in development - rails 2.x wasn''t like this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
I also noticed that on my app, even in development: Completed 200 OK in 1390ms (Views: 294.7ms | ActiveRecord: 4.8ms) Josh wrote:> production isn''t bad at all: > > Completed 200 OK in 24ms (Views: 19.5ms | ActiveRecord: 2.2ms | > Sphinx: 0.0ms) > > However, it''s highly annoying to wait for 1 second requests in > development - rails 2.x wasn''t like this.-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.