Rails - Nov 2010 - No route matches controller - scaffold generated code

I am new to RoR, but I have been struggling with a mysterious error
for days.  I am using a standard installation approach on a clean
ubuntu system

I created a very simple application, just reading from a mysql table
called dogs.  The application was totally generated with scaffold.

rails server -p 3001   #Starts server

When I run, I get the error "No route matches controller"
   http://localhost:3001/dogs

If I remove all the link_to cells, the application runs and returns
data.

If I put back just one line "    <td><%= link_to
''Show'', dog %></td>",

 I still get the error complaining about the 
":action=>"destroy"
route.


== scaffold =
rails g scaffold dog dog_id:integer color:string gender:string
dog_name:string --skip-migration


===========Generated Source Code============
<% @dogs.each do |dog| %>
  <tr>
    <td><%= dog.dog_id %></td>
    <td><%= dog.color %></td>
    <td><%= dog.gender %></td>
    <td><%= dog.dog_name %></td>
    <td><%= link_to ''Show'', dog %></td>
    <td><%= link_to ''Edit'', edit_dog_path(dog)
%></td>
    <td><%= link_to ''Destroy'', dog, :confirm =>
''Are you
sure?'', :method => :delete %></td>
  </tr>
<% end %>

========= ERROR ==========## No route matches controller ############
Showing /home/ruby/hub2/app/views/dogs/index.html.erb where line #20
raised:
No route matches {:controller=>"dogs",
:action=>"destroy", :id=>#<Dog
dog_id: 1, color: "Golden", gender: "Female", dog_name:
"Daisy">}

Extracted source (around line #20):

17:     <td><%= dog.color %></td>
18:     <td><%= dog.gender %></td>
19:     <td><%= dog.dog_name %></td>
20:     <td><%= link_to ''Show'', dog %></td>
21:     <td><%= link_to ''Edit'', edit_dog_path(dog)
%></td>
22:     <td><%= link_to ''Destroy'', dog, :confirm
=> ''Are you
sure?'', :method => :delete %></td>
23:   </tr>

========== routes.rb   =============Hub2::Application.routes.draw do
  resources :dogs
end


========= rake routes ===========root@ubu-bob:/home/ruby/hub2# rake routes
(in /home/ruby/hub2)
    dogs GET    /dogs(.:format)
{:controller=>"dogs", :action=>"index"}
    dogs POST   /dogs(.:format)
{:controller=>"dogs", :action=>"create"}
 new_dog GET    /dogs/new(.:format)
{:controller=>"dogs", :action=>"new"}
edit_dog GET    /dogs/:id/edit(.:format)
{:controller=>"dogs", :action=>"edit"}
     dog GET    /dogs/:id(.:format)
{:controller=>"dogs", :action=>"show"}
     dog PUT    /dogs/:id(.:format)
{:controller=>"dogs", :action=>"update"}
     dog DELETE /dogs/:id(.:format)
{:controller=>"dogs", :action=>"destroy"}


=== Installation == I followed these instructions on a brand new and fully
updated
version of ubuntu 10.04

 http://castilho.biz/blog/2010/05/08/how-to-install-ruby-on-rails-on-ubuntu-10-04-lucid-lynx/
 How to install Ruby on Rails on Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx
    Follow these steps to have a fresh installation of Ruby on Rails
in Ubuntu 10.04:

  sudo su
  apt-get -y install build-essential
  apt-get -y install ruby rdoc libopenssl-ruby
  wget http://production.cf.rubygems.org/rubygems/rubygems-1.3.7.tgz
  tar zxvf rubygems-1.3.7.tgz
  cd rubygems-1.3.7
  ruby setup.rb
  ln -s /usr/bin/gem1.8 /usr/local/bin/gem
  gem install rails  ;# (takes awhile with no output.. )

#Installing MySQL gem:

  apt-get -y install ruby-dev libmysql-ruby libmysqlclient-dev
  gem install mysql

=====
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

On Nov 14, 6:38 pm, bobtr
<bobt...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> rails g scaffold dog dog_id:integer color:string gender:string
> dog_name:string --skip-migration
Since you put --skip-migration, could you post table structure?  Maybe
missing an ID or some other field?  Reserved word bug?  Sometimes I''ve
had to restart ruby server when working with routes.rb, but shouldn''t
be necessary with a fresh scaffold.  Problem does seem related to
routes.rb, I bet using:action controller and id in link_to() would work

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

chris wrote in post #961631:
> On Nov 14, 6:38pm, bobtr
<bobt...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> rails g scaffold dog dog_id:integer color:string gender:string
>> dog_name:string --skip-migration
>
> Since you put --skip-migration, could you post table structure?
[...]

More to the point, why did you skip the migration?

Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Here is the table definition from the generated schema.rb

  create_table "dogs", :primary_key => "dog_id", :force
=> true do |t|
    t.string "color",    :limit => 20
    t.string "gender",   :limit => 20
    t.string "dog_name", :limit => 20
  end


I used skip-migration because the table already exists in mysql.
When I move from learning mode to development mode, I will need to write 
code against existing databases, so I can''t maintain the database
source
code in ruby.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

chris wrote in post #961631:
> routes.rb, I bet using:action controller and id in link_to() would work
If you would kindly give me an exact syntax, I''d be like to try it.

I would, however, like to understand why the generated code does not 
work.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Bob T. wrote in post #961643:
> Here is the table definition from the generated schema.rb
>
>   create_table "dogs", :primary_key => "dog_id",
:force => true do |t|
>     t.string "color",    :limit => 20
>     t.string "gender",   :limit => 20
>     t.string "dog_name", :limit => 20
>   end
>
>
> I used skip-migration because the table already exists in mysql.
> When I move from learning mode to development mode, I will need to write
> code against existing databases, so I can''t maintain the database
source
> code in ruby.
That''s not quite true.  You need to learn about rake db:schema:dump.

Anyway, you should be using migrations wherever possible, especially as 
you learn.

Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #961663:
>>
>> I used skip-migration because the table already exists in mysql.
>> When I move from learning mode to development mode, I will need to
write
>> code against existing databases, so I can''t maintain the
database source
>> code in ruby.
>
> That''s not quite true.  You need to learn about rake
db:schema:dump.
Let me rephrase ..  I don''t want to depend on ruby for schema 
definition, even if it can do it.

Anyway, I did the migrate separately, like this:
  rake db:migrate

It brought all the table definitions over from my mysql database.

>
> Anyway, you should be using migrations wherever possible, especially as
> you learn.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

That''s the problem:

On Nov 15, 2:20 pm, "Bob T."
<li...-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
>   create_table "dogs", :primary_key => "dog_id",
:force => true do |t|
I got a similar error under 2.3.8 with your schema.  AR expects ID to
be called ''id'', you can override it in the model or this would
work:

  create_table :dogs'' do |t|
    t.string "color",    :limit => 20
    t.string "gender",   :limit => 20
    t.string "dog_name", :limit => 20
  end

I would also recommend using migrations.  Sometimes it feels like
adding a layer of abstraction for it''s own sake, but in the long run
it is a great idea.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

On 15 November 2010 19:20, Bob T.
<lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> Here is the table definition from the generated schema.rb
>
>  create_table "dogs", :primary_key => "dog_id",
:force => true do |t|
>    t.string "color",    :limit => 20
>    t.string "gender",   :limit => 20
>    t.string "dog_name", :limit => 20
>  end
>
>
> I used skip-migration because the table already exists in mysql.
> When I move from learning mode to development mode, I will need to write
> code against existing databases, so I can''t maintain the database
source
> code in ruby.
Did you put
set_primary_key "dog_id"
in the the dog model?

Colin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Bob T. wrote in post #961668:
> Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #961663:
>>>
>>> I used skip-migration because the table already exists in mysql.
>>> When I move from learning mode to development mode, I will need to
write
>>> code against existing databases, so I can''t maintain the
database source
>>> code in ruby.
>>
>> That''s not quite true.  You need to learn about rake
db:schema:dump.
>
> Let me rephrase ..  I don''t want to depend on ruby for schema
> definition, even if it can do it.
Why not?  IMHO you are making a huge mistake.  The advantages of having 
Rails manage your DB schema are many -- the app knows what it wants in 
the DB; you can have your DB schema in version control with your source 
code; changes to the schema are no longer difficult.
>
> Anyway, I did the migrate separately, like this:
>   rake db:migrate
>
> It brought all the table definitions over from my mysql database.
How could it do that?  rake db:migrate only executes your migration 
files.

Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

# Here is the solution....

class Dog < ActiveRecord::Base
set_primary_key "dog_id"
end

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Someone else found this before I saw yours, but that is the problem.
I assumed that scaffold would know what the primary key is , because it 
was identified in the migrated schema:

schema.rb

  create_table "dogs", :primary_key => "dog_id", :force
=> true do |t|
    t.string "color",    :limit => 20
    t.string "gender",   :limit => 20
    t.string "dog_name", :limit => 20
  end


Thanks for your help!

Colin Law wrote in post #961671:
> On 15 November 2010 19:20, Bob T.
<lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> When I move from learning mode to development mode, I will need to
write
>> code against existing databases, so I can''t maintain the
database source
>> code in ruby.
>
> Did you put
> set_primary_key "dog_id"
> in the the dog model?
>
> Colin
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Regarding migrations -

We use Oracle, MySql , PHP and are just considering using RoR.

If we choose to develop some things in RoR, it will have to learn to get 
along with the code and the database tables we already have.

If you use only one technology, I understand why you would recommend 
using that technology exclusively.   Personally, I don''t believe in 
getting locked into a particular technology.   Thats my choice.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Bob T. wrote in post #961705:
> Regarding migrations -
Please quote when replying.
>
> We use Oracle, MySql , PHP, Perl/DBI and are just considering using RoR.
>
> If we choose to develop some things in RoR, it will have to learn to get
> along with the code and the database tables we already have.
And so it can.  But you should dump the schema into the schema file as I 
already suggested.
>
> If you use only one technology, I understand why you would recommend
> using that technology exclusively.   Personally, I don''t believe
in
> getting locked into a particular technology.   Thats my choice.
I don''t either. But while you''re developing in Rails, you
should use
Rails migrations.

It''s not great practice to have multiple applications touching the same
DB anyway.

Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Dear all,
This is a repost of my question, because the first post is considered as thread 
hijack.
I have changed the title, hopefully this time it''s not hijacking any
threads :D

I have a silly problem in setting up a relationship between 4 models. 

I set these 4 models, ComUser, DefJabatan, DefUserRole, DefKelamin. In each 
model with name started with ''Def'', i put a has_one:ComUser
relationship.
So naturally i have 3 belongs_to relationship in ComUser.
I do a simple query in the controller: @users = ComUser.find(:first)
and in the view, i simply put a object debug: <%=debug(@users)%>

and I get this:

--- !ruby/object:ComUser 
attributes: 
  def_jabatan_id: "1"
  created_at: 2010-11-16 04:31:35
  def_user_role_id: "1"
  gsm: "-"
  updated_at: 2010-11-16 04:31:35
  alamat: "-"
  username: admin
  id: "1"
  def_kelamin_id: "1"
  password: admin
  online_status: "2"
attributes_cache: {}

I''m getting a feeling that I didn''t set the relationship
right, because i don''t
see any attributes addition in the ComUser from the model started with 
Def-something that i create above..

Am I missing something here, like violating a naming convention or something? 

I even tries to alter the table by implicitly put a foreign key in the table for
ComUser model using sql statements, and the debug result is still the same.
How can i make this relationship work?

Thanks 

PS. I put the code snippet that i use for migrating the database and defining 
the relationship below.

Regards,
Arga


ComUser < ActiveRecord::Base
   belongs_to :DefKelamin
   belongs_to :DefUserRole
   belongs_to :DefJabatan
Migration:
    create_table :com_users do |t|
    t.timestamps
    t.references :def_jabatan, :null => false
    t.integer :def_kelamin_id, :null => false
    t.references :def_user_role, :null => false
    t.column :username,''varchar(20)'', :null => false
    t.column :password,''varchar(20)'', :null => false
    end

DefJabatan < ActiveRecord::Base
   has_one:ComUser
Migration:
    create_table :def_jabatans do |t|
    t.timestamps
    t.column :jabatan,''varchar(20)'', :null => false
    end

DefUserRole < ActiveRecord::Base
   has_one:ComUser
Migration:
    create_table :def_user_roles do |t|
    t.timestamps
    t.column :role,''varchar(20)'', :null => false
    t.string :description, :null => false
    t.string :icon
    end

DefKelamin < ActiveRecord::Base
    has_one :ComUser
Migration:
    create_table :def_kelamins do |t|
    t.timestamps
    t.column :kelamin,''varchar(10)'', :null => false
    end


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

arga aridarma wrote in post #961713:
> Dear all,
> This is a repost of my question, because the first post is considered as
> thread
> hijack.
> I have changed the title, hopefully this time it''s not hijacking
any
> threads :D
Still hijacking.  Please start a new thread.

Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
<lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> arga aridarma wrote in post #961713:
>> Dear all,
>> This is a repost of my question, because the first post is considered
as
>> thread
>> hijack.
>> I have changed the title, hopefully this time it''s not
hijacking any
>> threads :D
>
> Still hijacking.  Please start a new thread.
What are you talking about? I''m reading this via the mailing list; on
this end of things _both_ of arga''s mails are hijacking nothing.
> Best,
> --
> Marnen Laibow-Koser
> http://www.marnen.org
> marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Brian Troutwine
<brian-MmYI4SXeg2M3tL2svhKZZQ@public.gmane.org>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
> <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > arga aridarma wrote in post #961713:
> >> Dear all,
> >> This is a repost of my question, because the first post is
considered as
> >> thread
> >> hijack.
> >> I have changed the title, hopefully this time it''s not
hijacking any
> >> threads :D
> >
> > Still hijacking.  Please start a new thread.
>
> What are you talking about? I''m reading this via the mailing list;
on
> this end of things _both_ of arga''s mails are hijacking nothing.

If you check via Google Groups, it did.

-- 
Erol M. Fornoles
http://github.com/Erol
http://twitter.com/erolfornoles
http://ph.linkedin.com/in/erolfornoles

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Erol Fornoles
<erol.fornoles-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Brian Troutwine
<brian-MmYI4SXeg2M3tL2svhKZZQ@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
>> <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > arga aridarma wrote in post #961713:
>> >> Dear all,
>> >> This is a repost of my question, because the first post is
considered
>> >> as
>> >> thread
>> >> hijack.
>> >> I have changed the title, hopefully this time it''s
not hijacking any
>> >> threads :D
>> >
>> > Still hijacking.  Please start a new thread.
>>
>> What are you talking about? I''m reading this via the mailing
list; on
>> this end of things _both_ of arga''s mails are hijacking
nothing.
>
> If you check via Google Groups, it did.
Huh.
> --
> Erol M. Fornoles
> http://github.com/Erol
> http://twitter.com/erolfornoles
> http://ph.linkedin.com/in/erolfornoles
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Brian Troutwine
<brian-MmYI4SXeg2M3tL2svhKZZQ@public.gmane.org>wrote:
> > If you check via Google Groups, it did.
>
> Huh.
>
Link to the original thread, which was originally titled "No route matches
controller - scaffold generated code"

http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread/thread/ff7ff1c1dd447e90


-- 
Erol M. Fornoles
http://github.com/Erol
http://twitter.com/erolfornoles
http://ph.linkedin.com/in/erolfornoles

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Erol Fornoles
<erol.fornoles-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Brian Troutwine
<brian-MmYI4SXeg2M3tL2svhKZZQ@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> > If you check via Google Groups, it did.
>>
>> Huh.
>
> Link to the original thread, which was originally titled "No route
matches
> controller - scaffold generated code"
>
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread/thread/ff7ff1c1dd447e90
Clearly Google Groups does more leg-work compared to Gmail in keeping
threads together. I was rather as confused as arga. Sorry, all.
> --
> Erol M. Fornoles
> http://github.com/Erol
> http://twitter.com/erolfornoles
> http://ph.linkedin.com/in/erolfornoles
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.