Joshua Partogi
2010-Feb-11 23:29 UTC
What is the appserver for production that works best with Rails3?
Hi all, In development I used webrick, but I suppose I don''t want to use that in production. With rails2 I would use mongrel or thin. But as far as I know, mongrel is no longer developed? So are we left to thin these days? Does thin plays nicely with Rails3? What is your latest experience on this? Thank you very much for the insights. -- http://twitter.com/scrum8 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Rick DeNatale
2010-Feb-12 00:45 UTC
Re: What is the appserver for production that works best with Rails3?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Joshua Partogi <joshua.partogi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Hi all, > > In development I used webrick, but I suppose I don''t want to use that > in production. With rails2 I would use mongrel or thin. But as far as > I know, mongrel is no longer developed? So are we left to thin these > days? Does thin plays nicely with Rails3? What is your latest > experience on this? > > Thank you very much for the insights.For production I''d use Passenger (a.k.a. modrails) with Ruby 1.9. Should work fine with Rails3 since it drives the rack interface. -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Conrad Taylor
2010-Feb-12 00:48 UTC
Re: What is the appserver for production that works best with Rails3?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>wrote:> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Joshua Partogi > <joshua.partogi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In development I used webrick, but I suppose I don''t want to use that > > in production. With rails2 I would use mongrel or thin. But as far as > > I know, mongrel is no longer developed? So are we left to thin these > > days? Does thin plays nicely with Rails3? What is your latest > > experience on this? > > > > Thank you very much for the insights. > > For production I''d use Passenger (a.k.a. modrails) with Ruby 1.9. > Should work fine with Rails3 since it drives the rack interface. > >DHH recommends Passenger 2.2.9 if you decide to use it with Rails 3.0. -Conrad> -- > Rick DeNatale > > Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale > WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org<rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Joshua Partogi
2010-Feb-12 03:05 UTC
Re: What is the appserver for production that works best with Rails3?
Cool. Thanks for that. I''ve never heard of it before. I''ll try it this weekend. Regards, On Feb 12, 11:48 am, Conrad Taylor <conra...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denat...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Joshua Partogi > > <joshua.part...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > In development I used webrick, but I suppose I don''t want to use that > > > in production. With rails2 I would use mongrel or thin. But as far as > > > I know, mongrel is no longer developed? So are we left to thin these > > > days? Does thin plays nicely with Rails3? What is your latest > > > experience on this? > > > > Thank you very much for the insights. > > > For production I''d use Passenger (a.k.a. modrails) with Ruby 1.9. > > Should work fine with Rails3 since it drives the rack interface. > > DHH recommends Passenger 2.2.9 if you decide to use it with Rails > 3.0. > > -Conrad > > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.