Rails - Jan 2010 - restful_authentication - some default tests failing

Hey all

I just installed restful_authentication in a new project and have run
it''s specs.  I''m getting a few failures.  Just looking at the
first, i
can''t understand why it''s failing - can anyone see?

#failing line from test
 route_for(:controller => ''users'', :action =>
''update'', :id =>
''1'').should == "/users/1"

#reported reason for failure
The recognized options <{"action"=>"show",
"id"=>"1",
"controller"=>"users"}> did not match
<{"action"=>"update",
"id"=>"1",
"controller"=>"users"}>, difference:
<{"action"=>"update"}>
If you''re expecting this failure, we suggest
{:get=>"/users/1"}.should_not be_routable

So, it looks like "/users/1" with a put isn''t pointing to
update.  But,
when i do rake routes i see

  user GET    /users/:id(.:format)  {:controller=>"users",
:action=>"show"}
       PUT    /users/:id(.:format)  {:controller=>"users",
:action=>"update"}
       DELETE /users/:id(.:format)  {:controller=>"users",
:action=>"destroy"}

It looks like the route should work.  And, in the console i can do this:
>> include Spec::Rails::Example::RoutingHelpers
=> Object
>> params_from(:put, ''/users/1'')
=> {:action=>"update", :controller=>"users",
:id=>"1"}

So, i don;t understand why the test is failing.  Any ideas?

thanks - max
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Max Williams wrote:
> Hey all
> 
> I just installed restful_authentication in a new project
Do yourself a favor and take it right back out again.  Restful_auth is 
based on unmaintainable, untestable generated crap code; it has no place 
in today''s Rails ecosystem.  Use Authlogic instead, which is actually 
designed properly.

Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Thanks Marnen, AuthLogic does look good actually.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.