thr3ads.net - Rails - skinny Controllers, fat models with REST? [Jan 2010]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

LeonS

2010-Jan-25 13:39 UTC

skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Hi,

I''m really new to rails, so i programmed some stuff and today i read
some things about skinny Controllers, fat models.
My Controllers are really fat now. So i''m asking myself how can i
shrink my controllers and move the code to the models, especially in
fact of REST e.g. in focus on error codes?

code example:
  # POST /tasks
  # POST /tasks.xml
  def create
    @authorized = false
    @addsubtask=false
    @task = Task.new(params[:task])
    if(@task.parent_id != nil ) #wenn parent id nicht leer ist
ueberpruefe ob Rechte fuer Uebertask da sind
      #if ( current_user.is_owner_of? Task.find(@task.parent_id) ) ||
( current_user.is_moderator_of? Task.find(@task.parent_id) )
      if ( current_user.has_rights_for_task? Task.find
(@task.parent_id) , ["Owner","Moderator"])
        @authorized = true #Rechte da
        @addsubtask = true
      else
        @authorized = false #Rechte da
        @addsubtask = true
      end
    end
    if ( ( (@authorized == false ) && (@addsubtask == false) ) ||
( (@authorized == true ) && (@addsubtask == true) ) )
      respond_to do |format|
        if(@task.priority == nil)
          @task.priority = Priority.find(2)
        end
        @task.accepts_role ''Owner'', current_user
        if @task.save
          #Task an
          if @addsubtask
            @task.move_to_child_of(@task.parent_id)
          end
          @task.recalculate_progress_recursive
          flash[:notice] = ''Task was successfully created.''
          format.html { redirect_to(@task) }
          format.xml  { render :xml => @task, :status
=> :created, :location => @task }
        else
          format.html { render :action => "new" }
          format.xml  { render :xml => @task.errors, :status
=> :unprocessable_entity }
        end
      end
    else
      respond_to do |format| #BENUTZER HAT KEINE RECHTE subtask
anzulegen
        format.html { render :file => "#{Rails.public_path}/
401.html", :status => :unauthorized } #401 page laden
        format.xml  { render :xml => @task.errors, :status
=> :unauthorized } #statuscode bearbeiten
      end
    end
  end



greetings
LeonS

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Alpha Blue

2010-Jan-25 15:13 UTC

head link

Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

You probably should extend your code by creating a module that deals 
with many of the conditions you are trying to handle. Then all you have 
to do is include the module in the controllers that require the methods.

module Foo

  def self.method_one
  end

  def Foo.method_two
  end

  class << self
    def method_three
    end
  end

end

You can do it a number of ways as my example shows.  The module goes in 
your lib folder.  You include it by doing:

class YourController < ActionController::Base
  include Foo

  def create
    ..
  end

end




-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Kristian Hellquist

2010-Jan-25 15:35 UTC

head link

Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

I personally use ResourceController,
http://github.com/jamesgolick/resource_controller,  for controllers
using the REST-pattern, but
http://github.com/josevalim/inherited_resources seems very nice too.

/K

2010/1/25 Alpha Blue
<lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org>:> You probably should extend your code by creating a module that deals
> with many of the conditions you are trying to handle. Then all you have
> to do is include the module in the controllers that require the methods.
>
> module Foo
>
>  def self.method_one
>  end
>
>  def Foo.method_two
>  end
>
>  class << self
>    def method_three
>    end
>  end
>
> end
>
> You can do it a number of ways as my example shows.  The module goes in
> your lib folder.  You include it by doing:
>
> class YourController < ActionController::Base
>  include Foo
>
>  def create
>    ..
>  end
>
> end
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Marnen Laibow-Koser

2010-Jan-25 15:45 UTC

head link

Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Kristian Hellquist wrote:> I personally use ResourceController,
> http://github.com/jamesgolick/resource_controller,  for controllers
> using the REST-pattern, but
> http://github.com/josevalim/inherited_resources seems very nice too.
Yes.  I use make_resourceful, which is similar.  Note, however, that 
neither this or Alpha Blue''s suggestion really addresses the question
of
making controllers skinny.

The OP''s controller is beyond fat into morbidly obese. :)  To fix, read
some good stuff about refactoring.  The short version:

0. If you haven''t already got tests and Cucumber features, write them 
now so you can make sure you''re not breaking anything.  And then get 
into the habit of writing tests first. :)
1. Find a coherent block of code.
2. Extract that into a separate method.
3. Move that method into the model.
4. Lather, rinse, repeat.> 
> /K
> 
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Curtis Schofield

2010-Jan-25 15:54 UTC

head link

Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Hey Leon!

very fun!

Basically what you will be doing is ''extract method'' and
shifting the
reponsibility
away from the Controller. The post reponding to this method about creating
module with methods is valuable - but to really get skinny controller/fat
model one needs to put the calls
onto the model level.

The first step is to Think about you model having methods encapsulating your
if logic

authorized? and add_as_subtask? now one of these may be about a specific
task - then
it would be an instance method - one of these may be about a Tasks in
general - then that
is a good canidate for a class method.

One thing i like to do is to make a ''build'' (and build!) class
method that
encapsulates a bunch of creation logic in the model.
;
ie
class << self
def build(params)
end
end
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:39 AM, LeonS
<leonard.stellbrink-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I''m really new to rails, so i programmed some stuff and today i
read
> some things about skinny Controllers, fat models.
> My Controllers are really fat now. So i''m asking myself how can i
> shrink my controllers and move the code to the models, especially in
> fact of REST e.g. in focus on error codes?
>
> code example:
>  # POST /tasks
>  # POST /tasks.xml
>  def create
>    @authorized = false
>    @addsubtask=false
>    @task = Task.new(params[:task])
>    if(@task.parent_id != nil ) #wenn parent id nicht leer ist
> ueberpruefe ob Rechte fuer Uebertask da sind
>      #if ( current_user.is_owner_of? Task.find(@task.parent_id) ) ||
> ( current_user.is_moderator_of? Task.find(@task.parent_id) )
>      if ( current_user.has_rights_for_task? Task.find
> (@task.parent_id) , ["Owner","Moderator"])
>        @authorized = true #Rechte da
>        @addsubtask = true
>      else
>        @authorized = false #Rechte da
>        @addsubtask = true
>      end
>    end
>    if ( ( (@authorized == false ) && (@addsubtask == false) ) ||
> ( (@authorized == true ) && (@addsubtask == true) ) )
>      respond_to do |format|
>        if(@task.priority == nil)
>          @task.priority = Priority.find(2)
>        end
>        @task.accepts_role ''Owner'', current_user
>        if @task.save
>          #Task an
>          if @addsubtask
>            @task.move_to_child_of(@task.parent_id)
>          end
>          @task.recalculate_progress_recursive
>          flash[:notice] = ''Task was successfully
created.''
>          format.html { redirect_to(@task) }
>          format.xml  { render :xml => @task, :status
> => :created, :location => @task }
>        else
>          format.html { render :action => "new" }
>          format.xml  { render :xml => @task.errors, :status
> => :unprocessable_entity }
>        end
>      end
>    else
>      respond_to do |format| #BENUTZER HAT KEINE RECHTE subtask
> anzulegen
>        format.html { render :file => "#{Rails.public_path}/
> 401.html", :status => :unauthorized } #401 page laden
>        format.xml  { render :xml => @task.errors, :status
> => :unauthorized } #statuscode bearbeiten
>      end
>    end
>  end
>
>
>
> greetings
> LeonS
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org<rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Curtis Schofield

2010-Jan-25 15:55 UTC

head link

Re: Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

> 0. If you haven''t already got tests and Cucumber features, write
them
> now so you can make sure you''re not breaking anything.  And then
get
> into the habit of writing tests first. :)
> 1. Find a coherent block of code.
> 2. Extract that into a separate method.
> 3. Move that method into the model.
> 4. Lather, rinse, repeat.
>
This is a wonderful post.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

LeonS

2010-Jan-25 15:55 UTC

head link

Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Ok, i will consider that.
Another question: how should i capsulate the rendering of unauthorized
access?
I will present the unauthorized error in varoius formats like html,
xml and js, so whats the best way to do that?



On 25 Jan., 16:45, Marnen Laibow-Koser
<li...-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> Kristian Hellquist wrote:
> > I personally use ResourceController,
> >http://github.com/jamesgolick/resource_controller,  for controllers
> > using the REST-pattern, but
> >http://github.com/josevalim/inherited_resourcesseems very nice too.
>
> Yes.  I use make_resourceful, which is similar.  Note, however, that
> neither this or Alpha Blue''s suggestion really addresses the
question of
> making controllers skinny.
>
> The OP''s controller is beyond fat into morbidly obese. :)  To fix,
read
> some good stuff about refactoring.  The short version:
>
> 0. If you haven''t already got tests and Cucumber features, write
them
> now so you can make sure you''re not breaking anything.  And then
get
> into the habit of writing tests first. :)
> 1. Find a coherent block of code.
> 2. Extract that into a separate method.
> 3. Move that method into the model.
> 4. Lather, rinse, repeat.
>
>
>
> > /K
>
> Best,
> --
> Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org
> mar...-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Curtis Schofield

2010-Jan-25 16:01 UTC

head link

Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

:status => :unprocessable_entity


I use the above - I don''t explain why unless we are talking html and
it''s
for a users benifit. I don''t like to give potential crackers help.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:55 AM, LeonS
<leonard.stellbrink-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Ok, i will consider that.
> Another question: how should i capsulate the rendering of unauthorized
> access?
> I will present the unauthorized error in varoius formats like html,
> xml and js, so whats the best way to do that?
>
>
>
> On 25 Jan., 16:45, Marnen Laibow-Koser
<li...-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Kristian Hellquist wrote:
> > > I personally use ResourceController,
> > >http://github.com/jamesgolick/resource_controller,  for
controllers
> > > using the REST-pattern, but
> > >http://github.com/josevalim/inherited_resourcesseems very nice
too.
> >
> > Yes.  I use make_resourceful, which is similar.  Note, however, that
> > neither this or Alpha Blue''s suggestion really addresses the
question of
> > making controllers skinny.
> >
> > The OP''s controller is beyond fat into morbidly obese. :)  To
fix, read
> > some good stuff about refactoring.  The short version:
> >
> > 0. If you haven''t already got tests and Cucumber features,
write them
> > now so you can make sure you''re not breaking anything.  And
then get
> > into the habit of writing tests first. :)
> > 1. Find a coherent block of code.
> > 2. Extract that into a separate method.
> > 3. Move that method into the model.
> > 4. Lather, rinse, repeat.
> >
> >
> >
> > > /K
> >
> > Best,
> > --
> > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org
> > mar...-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
> > --
> > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org<rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

LeonS

2010-Jan-25 16:15 UTC

head link

Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

I think i found a very nice solution:
http://techblog.floorplanner.com/2008/03/11/putting-http-status-codes-to-use-with-rails/

so what do you think about that?

On 25 Jan., 17:01, Curtis Schofield
<curtis.schofi...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> :status => :unprocessable_entity
>
> I use the above - I don''t explain why unless we are talking html
and it''s
> for a users benifit. I don''t like to give potential crackers help.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:55 AM, LeonS
<leonard.stellbr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Ok, i will consider that.
> > Another question: how should i capsulate the rendering of unauthorized
> > access?
> > I will present the unauthorized error in varoius formats like html,
> > xml and js, so whats the best way to do that?
>
> > On 25 Jan., 16:45, Marnen Laibow-Koser
<li...-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > Kristian Hellquist wrote:
> > > > I personally use ResourceController,
> > > >http://github.com/jamesgolick/resource_controller,  for
controllers
> > > > using the REST-pattern, but
> > > >http://github.com/josevalim/inherited_resourcesseemsvery nice
too.
>
> > > Yes.  I use make_resourceful, which is similar.  Note, however,
that
> > > neither this or Alpha Blue''s suggestion really addresses
the question of
> > > making controllers skinny.
>
> > > The OP''s controller is beyond fat into morbidly obese.
:)  To fix, read
> > > some good stuff about refactoring.  The short version:
>
> > > 0. If you haven''t already got tests and Cucumber
features, write them
> > > now so you can make sure you''re not breaking anything.
 And then get
> > > into the habit of writing tests first. :)
> > > 1. Find a coherent block of code.
> > > 2. Extract that into a separate method.
> > > 3. Move that method into the model.
> > > 4. Lather, rinse, repeat.
>
> > > > /K
>
> > > Best,
> > > --
> > > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org
> > > mar...-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
> > > --
> > > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org<rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscrib
e@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Curtis Schofield

2010-Jan-25 16:28 UTC

head link

Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Elegant. Thank you!

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:15 AM, LeonS
<leonard.stellbrink-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I think i found a very nice solution:
>
>
http://techblog.floorplanner.com/2008/03/11/putting-http-status-codes-to-use-with-rails/
>
> so what do you think about that?
>
> On 25 Jan., 17:01, Curtis Schofield
<curtis.schofi...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > :status => :unprocessable_entity
> >
> > I use the above - I don''t explain why unless we are talking
html and it''s
> > for a users benifit. I don''t like to give potential crackers
help.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:55 AM, LeonS
<leonard.stellbr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > Ok, i will consider that.
> > > Another question: how should i capsulate the rendering of
unauthorized
> > > access?
> > > I will present the unauthorized error in varoius formats like
html,
> > > xml and js, so whats the best way to do that?
> >
> > > On 25 Jan., 16:45, Marnen Laibow-Koser
<li...-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > Kristian Hellquist wrote:
> > > > > I personally use ResourceController,
> > > > >http://github.com/jamesgolick/resource_controller,  for
controllers
> > > > > using the REST-pattern, but
> > > > >http://github.com/josevalim/inherited_resourcesseemsvery
nice too.
> >
> > > > Yes.  I use make_resourceful, which is similar.  Note,
however, that
> > > > neither this or Alpha Blue''s suggestion really
addresses the question
> of
> > > > making controllers skinny.
> >
> > > > The OP''s controller is beyond fat into morbidly
obese. :)  To fix,
> read
> > > > some good stuff about refactoring.  The short version:
> >
> > > > 0. If you haven''t already got tests and Cucumber
features, write them
> > > > now so you can make sure you''re not breaking
anything.  And then get
> > > > into the habit of writing tests first. :)
> > > > 1. Find a coherent block of code.
> > > > 2. Extract that into a separate method.
> > > > 3. Move that method into the model.
> > > > 4. Lather, rinse, repeat.
> >
> > > > > /K
> >
> > > > Best,
> > > > --
> > > > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org
> > > > mar...-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
> > > > --
> > > > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
> Groups
> > > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
> .
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org<rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org><rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscrib
> e@googlegroups.com>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org<rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reasonably Related Threads

Search for more reasonably related threads

Rails - Jan 2010 - skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Re: Re: skinny Controllers, fat models with REST?

Reasonably Related Threads