I have a Store model that has_many Products. I need to allow the users to filter on certain conditions in the products. For example, products at the store that cost more than $50. I am planning on getting the parameter in the controller and modifying the product collection. I have experimented with a few things, but I think there is probably an elegant solution out there. I want to be able to filter and then call the collection using: store.products, since this is in a shared view. I have tried replacing the products with a new collection, but rails automatically modifies the database (store.products filtered_products). I dont want it to save as this is just going to be a read. Is there an easy way that I can pass conditions in store model to get the products I want in the controller and then call the collection using store.products in the view? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Do you mean there are products of different types ( models ) quite confused ?? On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Yanni Mac <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>wrote:> > I have a Store model that has_many Products. I need to allow the users > to filter on certain conditions in the products. For example, products > at the store that cost more than $50. I am planning on getting the > parameter in the controller and modifying the product collection. I > have experimented with a few things, but I think there is probably an > elegant solution out there. I want to be able to filter and then call > the collection using: store.products, since this is in a shared view. I > have tried replacing the products with a new collection, but rails > automatically modifies the database (store.products > filtered_products). I dont want it to save as this is just going to be > a read. Is there an easy way that I can pass conditions in store model > to get the products I want in the controller and then call the > collection using store.products in the view? > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > >-- Ruby on Rails Developer http://sandip.sosblog.com http://funonrails.wordpress.com www.joshsoftware.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
There are not different models for products. Product is one model and it has fields for price, etc.. I want to filter out products based on price: :conditions=>"price>50" Sandip Ransing wrote:> Do you mean there are products of different types ( models ) > quite confused ?? > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Yanni Mac > <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>wrote: > >> filtered_products). I dont want it to save as this is just going to be >> a read. Is there an easy way that I can pass conditions in store model >> to get the products I want in the controller and then call the >> collection using store.products in the view? >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> >> > >> > > > -- > Ruby on Rails Developer > http://sandip.sosblog.com > http://funonrails.wordpress.com > www.joshsoftware.com-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
You''re probably looking for named scopes. They can be used to add
conditions to an association, like store.products, on the fly.
For instance, if you have these named scopes on your Product model:
named_scope :price_less_than, lambda { |p| { :conditions => [''price
<= ?'', p] } }
named_scope :price_more_than, lambda { |p| { :conditions =>
[''price>= ?'', p] } }
... and a seach form with two fields, :price_max and :price_min, then
this code will let you filter your results:
proxy = store.products
proxy = proxy.price_less_than(params[:price_max]) unless params
[:price_max].blank?
proxy = proxy.price_more_than(params[:price_min]) unless params
[:price_min].blank?
...then you can use proxy anywhere you would have used store.products
(feed it to will_paginate, etc). If you have very specific conditions
that would clutter up the model, you can also use .scoped to create an
anonymous scope.
The benefit here is that the actual records aren''t retrieved until you
try to actually access elements of proxy, for instance by iterating
over it.
--Matt Jones
On Jun 5, 12:03 pm, Yanni Mac
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> I have a Store model that has_many Products. I need to allow the users
> to filter on certain conditions in the products. For example, products
> at the store that cost more than $50. I am planning on getting the
> parameter in the controller and modifying the product collection. I
> have experimented with a few things, but I think there is probably an
> elegant solution out there. I want to be able to filter and then call
> the collection using: store.products, since this is in a shared view. I
> have tried replacing the products with a new collection, but rails
> automatically modifies the database (store.products >
filtered_products). I dont want it to save as this is just going to be
> a read. Is there an easy way that I can pass conditions in store model
> to get the products I want in the controller and then call the
> collection using store.products in the view?
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.