i have noted a problem in will_paginate : In a pagination, when go to pages geather than 1 value thath'' ok, but if you back to page 1 in the URL appear the parameter page=1 this is bad for seo optimization, because engine view same page with diffent URL. how can remove the param only for the first page? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
In your controller you can redirect to the same action without the ''page'' in the querystring if it is equal to 1. def index redirect_to :action => ''index'' if params[:page] && params [:page].to_i == 1 params[:page] ||= 1 .... # your normal code here end On Mar 29, 5:03 am, Aldo Italo <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> i have noted a problem in will_paginate : > > In a pagination, when go to pages geather than 1 value thath'' ok, but if > you back to page 1 in the URL appear the parameter page=1 > this is bad for seo optimization, because engine view same page with > diffent URL. > how can remove the param only for the first page? > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
thank you... but problem is resolved for users eyes, but not for the engine, it view always the params page on the link pagination. I need a solution for visualize the first page link without url params. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Aldo Italo wrote:> thank you... but problem is resolved for users eyes, but not for the > engine, > it view always the params page on the link pagination. > I need a solution for visualize the first page link without url params.You can configure robots.txt to tell google & friends to not index pages that have the &page=... parameter. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> You can configure robots.txt to tell google & friends to not index pages > that have the &page=... parameter.i want to indicize the &page=2, &page=3, ect... i think to indicate only the &page=1 in the robot.txt, but i search a solution most dinamic.. example if i change name resource. thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
i think you should add a record in you routes.rb file that includes the page, for example: map.connect ''archive/:id'', :controller => ''articles'', :action => ''list'', :page => 1 map.connect ''archive/:id/:page'', :controller => ''articles'', :action => ''list'' these rows do on more thing, they change the url to: "/archive/id", "/ results/id/2"... which is good because then you can use page cache for your pagination, if you would like to keep the &page=.. you can do that simply by changing the first parameter to fit your needs. in addition, believe that 301 redirect even though it''s a bad solution solve the problem for search engines as well, in that case it''s must be 301 and the reason i think it''s bad is because one request becomes two and it slows things down for the client and the server. On Mar 29, 6:03 am, Aldo Italo <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> i have noted a problem in will_paginate : > > In a pagination, when go to pages geather than 1 value thath'' ok, but if > you back to page 1 in the URL appear the parameter page=1 > this is bad for seo optimization, because engine view same page with > diffent URL. > how can remove the param only for the first page? > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Aldo Italo < rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > i have noted a problem in will_paginate : > > In a pagination, when go to pages geather than 1 value thath'' ok, but if > you back to page 1 in the URL appear the parameter page=1 > this is bad for seo optimization, because engine view same page with > diffent URL. > how can remove the param only for the first page?Aldo, you should be able to setup and sitemap.xml to tell the search engines which pages you would like indexed. Also, you should be able to automate this by regenerating it each time you perform create, edit, and update actions. -Conrad> > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
my routes.rb have prior this question the path configured with "/myaction/:page_id" but this don''t change logical point view of search engine: it view however a different url betwen ".../mypage" and ".../mypage/1" i think the logical used by will_paginate for redisplay first page is mistaken, because the same identical page must have a unique url. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
of course there shouldn''t be 2 identical pages with different url... do you have also: "/myaction", :page => 1 in my app i have both lines: "/myaction", :page => 1 "/myaction/:page_id" and wiil_paginate have no problem setting the right link for the first page. On Mar 30, 1:55 pm, Aldo Italo <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> my routes.rb have prior this question the path configured with > "/myaction/:page_id" > but this don''t change logical point view of search engine: > it view however a different url betwen ".../mypage" and ".../mypage/1" > > i think the logical used by will_paginate for redisplay first page is > mistaken, because the same identical page must have a unique url. > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Aldo Italo wrote:> i have noted a problem in will_paginate : > > In a pagination, when go to pages geather than 1 value thath'' ok, but if > you back to page 1 in the URL appear the parameter page=1 > this is bad for seo optimization, because engine view same page with > diffent URL. > how can remove the param only for the first page?I created a patch that removes the ?page=1 problem when you are on the second page and want to display a link to go to the first page. It breaks some tests because they expect to see ?page=1, which is indeed stupid. I didn''t feel like fixing the tests too, so here is the patch: --- a/lib/will_paginate/view_helpers.rb +++ b/lib/will_paginate/view_helpers.rb @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ module WillPaginate stringified_merge @url_params, page_param else - @url_params[param_name] = page_one ? 1 : 2 + page_one ? @url_params.delete(param_name) : @url_params[param_name] = 2 end url = @template.url_for(@url_params) -- It was quite hard to get my head around the code as it does some funky overly complicated stuff to generate the url. I guess refactoring could be a good thing. There might be some edge cases where all this code is required, but for what I use it for, it is never being invoked... Best regards, -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---