Dear all, What is the best architecture in terms of performance for Rails. Is lighttpd + mongrel the most recommended deployment architecture for Rails? Or is there any better architecture that outperform this architecture? Thank you very much in advance. -- If you can''t believe in God the chances are your God is too small. Read my blog: http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/ Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/jpartogi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
phusion passenger + apache? t Joshua Partogi wrote:> Dear all, > > What is the best architecture in terms of performance for Rails. Is > lighttpd + mongrel the most recommended deployment architecture for > Rails? Or is there any better architecture that outperform this > architecture? > > Thank you very much in advance. >-- ==============================================================================Tomas Meinlschmidt, MS {MCT, MCP+I, MCSE, AER}, NetApp Filer/NetCache www.meinlschmidt.com www.maxwellrender.cz www.lightgems.cz ============================================================================== --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Mar 18, 2:40 am, Joshua Partogi <joshua.j...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Dear all, > > What is the best architecture in terms of performance for Rails. Is > lighttpd + mongrel the most recommended deployment architecture for > Rails? Or is there any better architecture that outperform this > architecture? >As far as I can tell the big 2 these days are nginx + mongrel, apache + passenger and probably quite a few people using apache + mongrel. Fred> Thank you very much in advance. > > -- > If you can''t believe in God the chances are your God is too small. > > Read my blog:http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/ > Follow me on twitter:http://twitter.com/jpartogi--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Well, in my experience there are probably three ways to go: apache + passenger* apache + mongrel/thin nginx + mongrel/thin Personally, I run with just apache + passenger from this point forward. It has done everything I need, and has had zero downtime due to the configuration, and more due to my idiotic way of handling airflow inside the server case. On Mar 17, 9:40 pm, Joshua Partogi <joshua.j...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Dear all, > > What is the best architecture in terms of performance for Rails. Is > lighttpd + mongrel the most recommended deployment architecture for > Rails? Or is there any better architecture that outperform this > architecture? > > Thank you very much in advance. > > -- > If you can''t believe in God the chances are your God is too small. > > Read my blog:http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/ > Follow me on twitter:http://twitter.com/jpartogi--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Joshua Partogi wrote:> Dear all, > > What is the best architecture in terms of performance for Rails. Is > lighttpd + mongrel the most recommended deployment architecture for > Rails?[...] I think most people are either using Passenger (my current choice) or one of the Thin-based solutions. JRuby inside a Java servlet container might be worth looking at too; I''ve never gone that route, but JRuby is supposed to be very fast. OTOH, Java servlet containers can be a pain. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org http://www.marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---