EngineYard. However if you can''t afford that, RailsMachine is going
to be the next best but the support is nowhere near the same level.
On Nov 5, 4:49 pm, Knut Linke
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> Dear Receiver and Forummembers ;),
> I''m looking for a hoster in the US which provides the best
enviroment
> for a Ruby on Rails application. This should include Managed Server
> Support by the Linux Administration (I have no experiences with Linux so
> far), Backup and monitoring.
> The load on the server will be around 200 active customers per day (so
> really less, but the need to be served quick)
>
> Which hoster can you recommend? Which hoster do you use? Which hoster
> should not be used for such a project?
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---